We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

The Main Function Of Education Is To Maintain A Value Consensus In Society

essay
The whole doc is available only for registered users

A limited time offer! Get a custom sample essay written according to your requirements urgent 3h delivery guaranteed

Order Now

The main function of education is to maintain a value consensus in society, this is the main idea of Durkheim. He also believed that a major function of education was to prepare children for the world of work. He outlined this with three broad functions role allocation, skill provision and socialisation. The problem with Durkheim’s theory is he didn’t actually carry out empirical research, he was expressing his opinion based on his functionalist views. Functionalists also believe education is a form of secondary socialization and social solidarity. This would support the claim that the main function of education is to maintain a value consensus in society. This is because they are being taught the accepted cultural beliefs and behaviour in society at an early age, while also being taught to work as a community (working inside of your school class with some people you may not like) even though it can be hard. Parson views education as being part of meritocracy. He saw it as a secondary agent of socialisation. A bridge between the family and society, getting children ready for their adult roles.

School prepares the children for the change in their standards and ascribed status to the standards of society and their achieved status. This is more evidence of education preparing children to allow for a value consensus in society. The problem with this theory is not all children have equal chances, meritocracy is undermined by statistics which show that not all children have equal chances. However Marxists ignore meritocracy as they believe in a capitalist society where money grants you power, success and status based on social class. Bowles and Gintis believed in the correspondence theory, which suggests what happens in school corresponds directly to what happens in the work place. For example the teacher is the boss and the students are the employees. They see it as education preparing students to be obedient good workers that can adapt to the needs of the system which will benefit the bourgeoisie. This is proof of education not creating a value consensus and in fact aiding the bourgeoisie.

Related Topics

We can write a custom essay

According to Your Specific Requirements

Order an essay
icon
300+
Materials Daily
icon
100,000+ Subjects
2000+ Topics
icon
Free Plagiarism
Checker
icon
All Materials
are Cataloged Well

Sorry, but copying text is forbidden on this website. If you need this or any other sample, we can send it to you via email.

By clicking "SEND", you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy. We'll occasionally send you account related and promo emails.
Sorry, but only registered users have full access

How about getting this access
immediately?

Your Answer Is Very Helpful For Us
Thank You A Lot!

logo

Emma Taylor

online

Hi there!
Would you like to get such a paper?
How about getting a customized one?

Can't find What you were Looking for?

Get access to our huge, continuously updated knowledge base

The next update will be in:
14 : 59 : 59