A Multitude of Truths Essay Sample
- Pages: 5
- Word count: 1,131
- Rewriting Possibility: 99% (excellent)
- Category: truth
Get Full Essay
Get access to this section to get all help you need with your essay and educational issues.Get Access
Introduction of TOPIC
Could you ever imagine living in a world where one plus one could not equal two? Living in a time where fact had little to no power over a higher authority. In this time there was a man named Galileo who had to put his very life on the line to fight for what he believed in. He was a man of science who was also very spiritual. He simply believed that there was “a multitude of truths” (Galileo, 87) and that some passages in the Bible needed to be reinterpreted to learn new lessons and account for new truths. Galileo was very spiritual and never intended to go against the church in any way.
He merely wanted his discoveries to try to be tied into the Holy Scripture so that they can uncover a deeper meaning to discover new truths and lessons. The actions of Galileo to some might be that of a heretic. The Catholic Church, which was very powerful and influential in Galileo’s day, strongly supported the idea of a geocentric universe. When Galileo began publishing papers against the suggestions and beliefs of the Catholic Inquisition he was regarded as being a heretic, a person who opposed the Church’s teachings.
Heresy in this time was a crime in which people were sentenced to death. Galileo escaped the charges of heresy once, but continued to publish his thoughts that were not accurate with the Bible. This time the Inquisition found him guilty of heresy. Galileo was a man who did go against the church, but he never intended to be a heretic. He only wanted his knowledge to be used to advance a previous theory and be used to reinterpret the Holy Scripture. He says this when he states:
“For my purpose is nothing but the following: if these reflections, which are from my own profession, should contain (besides errors) anything that may lead someone to advance a useful caution for the Holy Church in her deliberations about the Copernican system, then let it be accepted with whatever profit superiors will deem appropriate; if not, let my essay be torn up and burned, for I do not intend or pretend to gain from it any advantage that is not pious or Catholic. ” (Galileo, 91-92) Galileo is plainly asking for someone that is more competent in the areas of the Holy Scripture to help him in his quest to reinterpret the Bible.
He is in a sense begging for someone to prove him wrong using factual evidence. He is showing his sometimes over the top confidence that can make him appear as a heretic. But this is
not what should only be looked at. Later he says that he doesn’t want to upset the church with
Galileo is not saying that he should have the power to decide what is true or not, he is purely saying give me a chance to prove myself. He says this when he states: “I propose not that this book should not be condemned, but that it should not be condemned without understanding, examining, or even seeing it, as they would like. ” (Galileo, 90) Galileo has a voice that he wants to be heard. He knows that his ideas have the power to change minds, and he knows that the Church knows this too. Galileo is fighting for the facts that he discovered to be true to be held in the same value of truth as the Holy Scripture.
He is convinced that there is “a multitude of truths” (Galileo, 87) in the Bible. Since two truths can never contradict, the truths in science should always correspond with the truth of the Holy Scripture. Galileo feels that his discoveries in astronomy are no less false than the Holly Scripture itself. He says this when he states: “physical conclusions which have been truly demonstrated should not be given a lower place than scriptural passages, but rather one should clarify how such passages do not contradict those conclusions”.
(Galileo, 102) Galileo knows that he has made world changing discoveries and that you can never stop the truth. Galileo’s writings and discoveries have the power to change minds and in order for the Church to put an end to them they would have to put a stop learning all together. He knows this and says it when he states: “For in order to accomplish that objective, it would be necessary not only to prohibit Copernicus’s book and the writings of the other authors who follow the same doctrine, but also to ban all astronomical science completely. ” (Galileo, 102) No one, not even the church, has the power to put an end to learning.
If God did not want us to learn and discover he would not have given us the power to learn. Galileo believed that God created the universe and the earth to be discovered and that you cannot deny a sense that was given to you by the highest power of all. Galileo said that everyday “one is discovering Copernicus’s position is truer and truer” (Galileo, 103) So that if it were to be prohibited now after people have been reading and learning about it for so many years it would be an infringement on the truth, and to disallow it now would make it seem to be more correct.
Galileo then goes on to say that the prohibition of a science would not even be an option when he declares: “To prohibit the entire science would be no different than to reject hundreds of statements from the Holy Writ” (Galileo, 103) There will always be a need for the truth and science and neither of them will ever be replaced or banned. The need for science, the need for religion, and the quest for knowledge will never disappear. Galileo was one of many examples of someone fighting for what they believed in and knew what was right.
Galileo did go against the church, but he did not try to disprove anything in the Holy Scripture. He was a holy and spiritual man that knew that the truth could not be stopped. He accepted that there can be more than one truth and that some passages in the Bible could be reinterpreted using new knowledge and discoveries in science to learn new lessons. Galileo was forced to deal with people that were closed minded to his ideas and were unwilling to accept them for what they were, and that was great.