Accounting and Organizational Behaviour Essay Sample
A limited time offer!
Get a custom sample essay written according to your requirements urgent 3h delivery guaranteedOrder Now
Accounting and Organizational Behaviour Essay Sample
Those falling under total cost represent the total of total variable cost and total fixed cost. Not all variable costs have their variable cost per mile since variability need not vary with the miles travelled but on other factors. Not all cost therefore will have their total cost per mile since not all cost could be related on a per mile basis
Comment briefly on the statement “The more miles you travel, the cheaper it becomes”
This statement is generally true if the share of fixed cost to total cost is high. However, if variable cost is high; the statement is false because variable costs increase as number of miles travelled is increased.
Since there was projected reduction in the tour price while every cost item is projected to increase in 2008, there resulting projected 2008 net profit as reflected in 2008 budget is lower compared with the 2007.
The budget allowance for 70,000 level of output would appear as shown between 50% and 80% below:
Exercising tight control over how branches operate in the manner done by the Finance Director may fail to accomplish its intended objectives because it is not in accordance with principles of good budgeting management principles and organizational behaviour. Since fixed budgets are set at very demanding levels with targets being increased each year, it is expected that managers would have to be answerable for things that they could have not control whatsoever. Good budgeting theory requires goal congruence with what is expected from managers and what things could actually be made their responsibilities.
Case facts further provides that although the Finance Directors does privately does believe that many managers will not meet the tight budget, the same director will send a stern letter to any manager failing to meet monthly target, with a copy to the manager’s superior where the failing manager is made to explain. This practice of the company is obviously outside the good practice of the use of budgeting. This is an inhuman treatment to managers that could cause a high turnover on the employment of these managers. High employment turnover is not good for business since it is costly.
To make the budgetary control system effective (Johnson and Scholes, 1993; Weston and Brigham, 1993; Meigs and Meigs, 1995) is to have the managers take part in the preparation in the preparation of the budget. Each manager must be made part and must agree on their cost responsibilities where they could have control so that they could be held responsible. In the case the department is a revenue centre, like a marketing department, the manager must also take part in estimating the expected number of units to be sold or services to be rendered under a competitive so that manager could be expected to produce outputs based on what could be attainable. Cost should be broken into variable or controllable from fixed or uncontrollable for purpose of assigning responsibilities to managers (Balakrishnan, et. al, 2004: Paulsen and John, 2002; St. John, et. al, 2005; Cebenoyan, et. al, 1998; Chrisman, et. al, 2004)
How Benchmarking and Balance Scoreboard could be of use to Beam Ltd.?
Benchmarking is used to evaluate how the company is performing in relation to other companies in the industry where comparison could have some basis (Berry, et al., 1995; Drury, 2001a ; Drury, 2001b, Emmanuel, et al., 1990). Normally what are used as benchmarks should be those companies that are doing well industry and whose time is more or less similar or at least closely resembling that of the company’s size and condition. To illustrate, assuming Beam Ltd has similar amount or level of assets with that of the competitors, the revenues and profits (Bernstein, 1993; Brigham and Houston, 2002; Byars, L.,1991; Droms, 1990; Helfert, 1994) of the two companies could be compared. If the competitor would be having more revenues and higher profits than the company an understanding of the underlying reason must be investigated so that company could find what are its untapped strengths and opportunities. If on the other hand the Beam is performing better, the company should be able to sustain such status as it is possible that company is having a competitive advantage that must be protected for long term profitability.
Balance Scoreboard is used to put measures on important organizational activities as a way of controlling and influencing performance in the organization (Emmanuel, et al., 1996; Hislop, 2005; Horngren, et al, 2005). It is said that what is measured can be managed. By the same principle, it would mean that management must know how it is doing in terms of the overall and departmental objectives so that it could make adjustments or corrections if there is need to do so. Balance scoreboard is in effect linking performance of managers to corporate objectives and the same could be a way to motivate these employees in the attainment of corporate objective. The concept is also closely related to benchmarking since performance is a requirement from both concepts. Management could therefore combine the two concepts in designing programs for the company.
As a management accountant, I can help the company to achieve competitive advantage ( Lenway and Murtha,2004; Sisaye, 2005; Annerstedt, 2003; Fahy,1996; Mcwilliams, et. al, 2001) by providing the accurate and relevant accounting information to help management to effectively implement benchmarking and balance scoreboard concepts for Beam Ltd.
Annerstedt (2003) From Silicon Valley to Singapore: Location and Competitive Advantage in the Hard Disk Drive Industry; Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 34
Balakrishnan, et. al (2004) A Resource Granularity Framework for Estimating Opportunity Costs; Accounting Horizons, Vol. 18, 2004
Bernstein (1993) Financial Statement Analysis, IRWIN, Sydney, Australia
Berry, et al. (1995), Management Control: Theories , Issues and Practices, Macmillan
Brigham and Houston (2002) Fundamentals of Financial Management, Thomson South-Western, London, UK
Byars, L. (1991) Strategic Management, Formulation and Implementation – Concepts and Cases, New York: HarperCollins
Cebenoyan, et. al (1998), Cost Inefficiency and the Holding of Non-Traditional Assets by Solvent Stock Thrifts; Real Estate Economics, Vol. 26
Chrisman, et. al (2004) Comparing the Agency Costs of Family and Non-Family Firms: Conceptual Issues and Exploratory Evidence; Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, Vol. 28
Droms (1990) Finance and Accounting for Non Financial Managers, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, England
Drury (2001b), Management Accounting for Business Decision, 2nd Edition, Thomson
Drury, C. (2001a) Management Accounting for Business Decisions. 2nd Ed. Thomson
Emmanuel, et al. (1990), Accounting for Management Control, Chapman and Hall, London
Emmanuel, et al. (1996) Readings in Accounting for Management and Control, Thomson Publishing and, London
Fahy (1996) Competitive Advantage in International Services: A Resource-Based View; International Studies of Management & Organization, Vol. 26
Helfert, Erich (1994), Techniques for Financial Analysis, IRWIN, Syndey, Australia
Hislop (2005) Knowledge Manage in Organization, Oxford
Horngren, et al (2005) Management and Cost Accounting, 3rd edition, F.T. Prentice Hall
Johnson, G. and Scholes, K. (1993) Exploring Corporate Strategy – Text and Cases, Hemel Hempstead: Prentice-Hall.
Lenway and Murtha (2004) Knowledge and Competitive Advantage, the Coevolution of Firms, Technology and National Institutions; Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 35
Mcwilliams, et. al (2001) Strategic Management of Human Resources for Global Competitive Advantage; Journal of Business Strategies, Vol. 18
Meigs and Meigs, 1995, Financial Accounting, McGraw-Hill, Inc, London, UK
Paulsen and John (2002) Social Class and College Costs: Examining the Financial Nexus between College Choice and Persistence; Journal of Higher Education, Vol. 73
Sisaye (2005) Business Process Outsourcing: The Competitive Advantage; Issues in Accounting Education, Vol. 20
St. John, et. al (2005) Carter Diversity, College Costs, and Postsecondary Opportunity: An Examination of the Financial Nexus between College Choice and Persistence for African Americans and Whites; Journal of Higher Education, Vol. 76
Weston and Brigham, 1993, Essentials of Managerial Finance, Dryden Press, London, UK