We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

“An Inspector Calls” by J. B. Priestley Essay Sample

essay
  • Pages: 4
  • Word count: 875
  • Rewriting Possibility: 99% (excellent)
  • Category: play

Get Full Essay

Get access to this section to get all help you need with your essay and educational issues.

Get Access

Introduction of TOPIC

This is a play set in 1912 as it was written in this year. It was not until 33 years later in 1945 when it was first preformed. The genre of this play is fiction as it is based on a murder mystery. It is set in one evening in spring.

In this play it consisted of seven characters. All these characters were main, as they all had big and equally important parts.

The characters:

Arthur Birling – Father

Sybil Birling – Mother

Shelia Birling – Daughter

Eric Birling – Son

Edna – Maid

Gerald Croft – Son-in-law to be

Inspector Goole- Police Inspector

The play is mainly based on an inspector trying to teach a family a lesson. As he believes the way this family live there lives and treat other people in a horrible manner. As the play goes on the more information some which was hidden at the begging comes visible/known to the audience. The lesson the inspector wants to teach them is that what they are doing is wrong. They cannot treat people the way they want just because there status is high in the community. Plus at least one example for each character doing this becomes known. The inspector starts off suttle and then his approach to the situation becomes harsher and harsher.

The inspector starts off talking to Mr Birling and works his way through the rest of the family. He tells them in an underhand way no matter what the class of people you must not use your class in your advantage. This way the lesson is for them to reconsider there actions.

Priestley’s main concern were the way rich people used there power to commit evil. This play was an e

xample of reality, it showed the kind of things that used to happen so Priestly wanted to show it to

other people. That it was wrong and that is used to happen. This was his way to make known to people that situations like these are taking place. Also this helped show people this was wrong it was more like an eye opener.

There is a lot of irony of this play such as;

They are talking about the war ad how it will not happen and how the Titanic will not sink. Which happened after the play was written, Mr Birling also talks about how the Titanic will not sink. Then later on we discover the Titanic does actually sink. These are good ways to show it was written before the war. It also gives us an insight to the mentally of thinking behind people in those days. The thinking behind people in 1912 was that they can use there powder in which ever way the like, whether it affects other people or not. They believed they were in the right every time.

The lighting changed throughout the whole play mainly when in the presence of the Inspector. Before the Inspector arrives the mood is calm so the light was a cosy pink. It was brighter and became harsher on the arrival of the inspector. The sharp light was outside the “pink zone” and entered the outside world. It was also when the spotlight came on it was as if they were on the spot during the time they were being interrogated by the inspector.

In this way there were not many sound effects. Including the door bell, I believe that was the only sound effect. The reason they added this sound effect is to break the family dinner and enter the outside world it’s as if they “pink zone” has been broken. It was like someone entering the family zone and turning it into reality whilst bringing in the outside world.

When introducing a character there was normally a drastic change in the mood and light. So it shows a character is either entering or leaving. They needed to make this clear as when the inspector started gathering information. The family’s pink zone was breaking up more and more. It’s almost as if they are being brought back to reality from there safe family zone.

At the end of most acts it was left as cliff hanger this is to make you want to read more and think to yourself what could possible happen next. For example at the end of act 1 is when Shelia is asking Gerrald what his connection was with this Eva Smith. So it stops when she is asking him questions so this cliff hanger is whether he tells Shelia the truth or whether he lies. These cliff hangers were purposely put there by Priestly so you want to read more. He leaves you intrigued of what will happen.

Sorry, but full essay samples are available only for registered users

Choose a Membership Plan

We can write a custom essay on

“An Inspector Calls” by J. B. Priestle ...

According to Your Specific Requirements.

Order an essay

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

A Raisin In The Sun

In the play, A Raisin in the Sun, written by Lorraine Hansberry, influence and interference plays a role in everyday life. The Younger family occupies a small living space in a boarding house, they are always together. Mama is an influence yet interference to the family. The characters that feel this way is Walter, Beaneatha, and Ruth. Without Mama the Younger family would get nowhere in life. Although Mama did not tell Walter to buy the liquor store, she was an influence by giving him money to spend on what he wants. Mama stated, "Monday morning I want you to take this money and take three thousand dollars and put it in a savings account for Beneatha's schooling. The rest you put in a checking account - with your name on it. And from now on any penny that come out of it is for you to look after" (106)....

"A Jury of Her Peers" Case

Adapted from Susan Glaspell's popular one-act play, Trifles (1920), "A Jury of Her Peers" is about sisterhood. Women's roles as wives, mothers, and homemakers do not make them totally passive, unintelligent, or subordinate to men. Mrs. Peters, for example, being small, thin, and soft-spoken, did not strike Martha Hale as a sheriff's wife when they first met; however, Mrs. Peters reveals her inner strength in defying her husband by suppressing evidence that would surely convict Minnie Wright of murder. Because they understand how John's killing the canary must have been the last straw in killing his wife's love of life, Martha and Mrs. Peters "knot" the criminal investigation. They shift their loyalty from their husbands, and the male-dominated legal system, to a woman who mirrors their own lives. As Martha wistfully says of her regret in abandoning her neighbor Minnie, "We live close together, and we live far apart. We...

Shakespeare’s Moral Play

Morality is a precise system of values regarding the distribution between right and wrong or good or bad behavior. Macbeth morality of an action is committing the evil deed, he deliberately thinks the treacherous nature. In Shakespeare’s Macbeth, the moral of a play is identified through personal ambition and its disastrous results. Macbeth ends up killing his loyal King believing the witches prophecy. He kills his only best friend, assuming that his best friend might have been suspicious of King Murder. First, Macbeth moral of action in the play is shown through the death of King of Scotland. The significance of the quote shows that he knows that he is wrong and not moral. He is repenting to be forgiven once more. Then he had to choose a side is right or wrong but instead, he chooses wrong by killing his loyal King of Scotland. Macbeth is a dissent man;...

Popular Essays

logo

Emma Taylor

online

Hi there!
Would you like to get such a paper?
How about getting a customized one?