We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

Analysing Squealer’s Speech

essay
The whole doc is available only for registered users
  • Pages: 2
  • Word count: 437
  • Category: Animals

A limited time offer! Get a custom sample essay written according to your requirements urgent 3h delivery guaranteed

Order Now

Squealer’s constant use of the word ‘comrades’ is used to gain the trust of the rest of the animals and direct the attention to them, so they believe that what he is about to say is entitled to all of them. This one word convinces them that they are all a team, and what the pigs are planning is for the best of everyone. He also tried to convince the animals that Napoleon was a good, responsible leader and positively talked about him and the ‘sacrifices’ that he had made for Animal Farm. It was told that Napoleon was a zealous and committed member of the community who ‘took extra labour upon himself’ (page 37) when, in reality, he was corrupt, deceptive and did not do as much hard work as some of the other animals (like Boxer); therefore using distortion to win the appraisal of the animals. Also, Squealer’s constant use of rhetorical questions (i.e. ‘Surely, comrades, you do not want Jones back?’) shows that he knew exactly what the animals wanted/thought, and because of their great fear of Jones’s return, they would listen to anyone or do anything to keep him away. Squealer and Napoleon are using this to their advantage by manipulating them into thinking that if they did not obey their orders, the rebellion would fail. His repetition of this question initiates fear in the animals. He also used propaganda to mislead the animals into thinking that the pigs were ‘always right’ and any opposing actions would not succeed.

What Squealer meant by the word ‘tactics’ was more deceitful than it seemed. He was using his superiority of knowledge and authority to show the others that he was clearly more intelligent, and understood the ways of corruption much better than they did. It seemed much easier to accuse Snowball of all Napoleon’s wrongdoings because it would get him out of the way, and the animals would abide by his rules. What the animals thought of the word ‘tactics’ was that Napoleon had cunningly disapproved of Snowball’s windmill plans, when he was actually trying to get rid of him, because of his deceptive ways. In reality, the pigs were trying to bring power into Napoleon’s hands by framing Snowball for being the ‘villain’, and denouncing him so that all animals turned against him and didn’t listen to him, probably because they saw him as a major threat.

The main point of this speech was to evangelise the malfeasance of Snowball, and to persuade the audience that Napoleon was the proper leader who would lead them to victory, with the rebellion.

Related Topics

We can write a custom essay

According to Your Specific Requirements

Order an essay
icon
300+
Materials Daily
icon
100,000+ Subjects
2000+ Topics
icon
Free Plagiarism
Checker
icon
All Materials
are Cataloged Well

Sorry, but copying text is forbidden on this website. If you need this or any other sample, we can send it to you via email.

By clicking "SEND", you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy. We'll occasionally send you account related and promo emails.
Sorry, but only registered users have full access

How about getting this access
immediately?

Your Answer Is Very Helpful For Us
Thank You A Lot!

logo

Emma Taylor

online

Hi there!
Would you like to get such a paper?
How about getting a customized one?

Can't find What you were Looking for?

Get access to our huge, continuously updated knowledge base

The next update will be in:
14 : 59 : 59