The speech was delivered by Dr. Fred Travis who presented his research advances of brain’s ability to change and adapt as a result of experience. The speech is informative because Dr. Fred Travis uses descriptions, demonstrations, and vivid detail to explain the subject which the audience wants to understand and remember.
Critique the speech as follows:
* Identify if the speaker’s objective is to inform, or to persuade. The speaker’s objective is to inform the audience, help them to understand the subject better, and to remember what they learned.
* How has the speaker drawn the audience in, what ‘hook’ is used? Dr. Fred Travis has drawn the audience in. He was able to keep everyone interested and engaged by telling stories to illustrate important points, used clear and vivid language such as short sentences, familiar words, and illustrated ideas with visuals and on-site experiment. * Has the speaker established credibility for the subject? Dr. Fred Travis has established credibility for the subject. He is a leading brain scientist. He spoke confidently and assertively inspiring the audience with his energy and words. He demonstrated with on-site experiment that supports what he’s saying to gain audience’s trust. * Did the speaker clearly identify the purpose of the speech? Dr. Fred Travis clearly identified the purpose of the speech by scientific research advances of brain’s ability to change as a result of experience. He used demonstrations and vivid detail to explain the subject. * Did the speaker give a preview of the speech?
Dr. Fred Travis gave a preview of the speech. He briefly introduced the main themes of the speech which is brain’s ability to change as a result of experience. * Body
* Were the transitions between sections/points in the speech clear? The transitions between sections/points in the speech were clear. The speaker often summarized what he had just presented and what he will address next. He also used specific conjunctive words or phrases when a sentence describes what he just said. * Was the speech focused?
The speech was focused through explaining how brain plasticity works and demonstrating that the brain continues to create new neural pathways and alter existing ones in order to adapt to new experiences. * Were the arguments supported?
The arguments were supported by research advances and on-site experiment. • Was the speech well organized?
The speech was well organized with a clear introduction, body, and close. The speaker made use of concepts and themes which run through the body of the speech providing structure and tying thoughts together in unified manner. * Conclusion
* Did the speaker signal the end of the speech?
The speaker signal the end of the speech by a brief statement “you want a brain” that sum up the main idea he want the audience to remember.
* Was the conclusion concise?
The conclusion was concise because the final statement was brief in form but comprehensive in scope.
* Did the conclusion reinforce the purpose of the speech? The conclusion reinforced the purpose of the speech to inform the audience of brain’s ability to change as a result of experience.
* If appropriate was there a call for a decision/action? There was a call for a decision/action which is “Don’t be content with a piece of paper with your college degree.”
* Delivery/Overall impression
* The speaker maintained eye contact with audience.
* The speaker was prepared.
* There was effective use of visual aids.
* The speaker used distractive phrases or mannerisms.
* The speaker used voice effectively (appropriate volume, rate, emphasis).
* The speaker used body language effectively.