We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

Brechtian Performance – Evaluation Essay Sample

essay
  • Pages: 3
  • Word count: 719
  • Rewriting Possibility: 99% (excellent)
  • Category: play

Get Full Essay

Get access to this section to get all help you need with your essay and educational issues.

Get Access

Introduction of TOPIC

1. What Brechtian techniques did you use in your group

In our play, which was a rendition of the popular children’s tale ‘The Three Muskateers’, we decided our social improvement topic was going to be homosexuality and homosexual marriage, and on that note we decided to cleverly rename it ‘The Three MuskaQueers’. Humour was the main theme of the play, and we furthered this by using obvious tehcniques, such as cross dressing and “cocks in frocks”. Georgia, Charlotte and I played the main roles of the gay characters, whereas James played the extremely feminine character, Rhonda, who was the epitome of a girly girl.We also applied our knowledge of montage, and used different types of scenes, ranging from naturalistic, to a slow motion scene. We also introduced a god, who was ‘God of the Gays’.

2. How well did you think you used them (Popular audince reaction/engagement/understanding. Critical; opinions of other practitioners & Self; personal targets you may have set yourself)

Our group used these techniques to our greatest ability. With montage, we had a slow motion scence in which we were chasing the robber, but we broke it to re-introduce the obvious humour, and used that as a transistion back into naturalistic. Hamzah, who played the God of the Gays, made sure that the god was as far from gay as possible, which made the contrast quite funny, because had he overreacted and exaggerated the character as we had done, the play would’ve been too overdramatic, so his presence took it down a notch, whi

ch was neccessary.We tried to break the fourth wall in the last scene, when Hamzah was communicating

Sorry, but full essay samples are available only for registered users

Choose a Membership Plan
with the audience, telling them about gay marriages and rights.

3. How well did you ‘synthesis’ your content (what you were saying) with the form (how you were saying it) What did you think was effective and why

In all honesty, I don’t believe we managed to communicate our message effectively, as we did not really have a clear understanding of how to interpret it into our play. I do believe, however, we were able to deliver the general message of homosexuality in our piece, and we conveyed our thoughts about gay marriage. We proved this effective by using an array of eclectic costumes, used convincing accents and used popular social aspects such as the song YMCA, using the phrase “in the village” as taken from Little Britain, and also furthered the gay lifestyle by acting out yoga stretches that posed as possible sexual innuendo. People understood where we were coming from, as we were obviously exaggerating everything, therefore it made it that much more comical.

4. If you were not happy with aspects of your work then what alternative approaches might you have pursued Mention at least 2 aspects of your peers work that you thought was effective and why, as you consider alternatives.We could’ve used techniques such as using stage directions, as Rebekka did in her piece about Adam & Eve. While she said her lines, she also injected lines such as “and now I will exit stage left” etc. As well as that, she introduced the play not actually telling the story, but saying what she would’ve said had she been telling the story, which made it more interesting. Later on the play, Stephanie and Ryan acted out a sex scene in a way which was comical and very unsexy, which added to the humour. They went behind the curtains and began throwing loads and loads of clothes out, suggesting they were taking them off, but it got a point, where there were far too many clothes to have been possible, which made the whole scene ridiculous and brilliant.Another effective technique was the cross cutting that was used in Chloe and Tanisha’s scene. While Chloe was explaining the danger sof obeasity, and how all the patients were striving to become fit and healthy, you could obviously see Tanisha in the background, as the obease character, gorging on a bag of Doritos. This tehcnique was cleverly done, and I would deifinitely like to incorporate it into any future plays.

We can write a custom essay on

Brechtian Performance – Evaluation Essay Sam ...
According to Your Specific Requirements.

Order an essay

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

A Raisin In The Sun

In the play, A Raisin in the Sun, written by Lorraine Hansberry, influence and interference plays a role in everyday life. The Younger family occupies a small living space in a boarding house, they are always together. Mama is an influence yet interference to the family. The characters that feel this way is Walter, Beaneatha, and Ruth. Without Mama the Younger family would get nowhere in life. Although Mama did not tell Walter to buy the liquor store, she was an influence by giving him money to spend on what he wants. Mama stated, "Monday morning I want you to take this money and take three thousand dollars and put it in a savings account for Beneatha's schooling. The rest you put in a checking account - with your name on it. And from now on any penny that come out of it is for you to look after" (106)....

"A Jury of Her Peers" Case

Adapted from Susan Glaspell's popular one-act play, Trifles (1920), "A Jury of Her Peers" is about sisterhood. Women's roles as wives, mothers, and homemakers do not make them totally passive, unintelligent, or subordinate to men. Mrs. Peters, for example, being small, thin, and soft-spoken, did not strike Martha Hale as a sheriff's wife when they first met; however, Mrs. Peters reveals her inner strength in defying her husband by suppressing evidence that would surely convict Minnie Wright of murder. Because they understand how John's killing the canary must have been the last straw in killing his wife's love of life, Martha and Mrs. Peters "knot" the criminal investigation. They shift their loyalty from their husbands, and the male-dominated legal system, to a woman who mirrors their own lives. As Martha wistfully says of her regret in abandoning her neighbor Minnie, "We live close together, and we live far apart. We...

Shakespeare’s Moral Play

Morality is a precise system of values regarding the distribution between right and wrong or good or bad behavior. Macbeth morality of an action is committing the evil deed, he deliberately thinks the treacherous nature. In Shakespeare’s Macbeth, the moral of a play is identified through personal ambition and its disastrous results. Macbeth ends up killing his loyal King believing the witches prophecy. He kills his only best friend, assuming that his best friend might have been suspicious of King Murder. First, Macbeth moral of action in the play is shown through the death of King of Scotland. The significance of the quote shows that he knows that he is wrong and not moral. He is repenting to be forgiven once more. Then he had to choose a side is right or wrong but instead, he chooses wrong by killing his loyal King of Scotland. Macbeth is a dissent man;...

Popular Essays

logo

Emma Taylor

online

Hi there!
Would you like to get such a paper?
How about getting a customized one?