We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

Bush’s 9/11 Address Compares to Reagan’s Challenger Tragedy Essay Sample

  • Pages: 3
  • Word count: 551
  • Rewriting Possibility: 99% (excellent)
  • Category: bush

Get Full Essay

Get access to this section to get all help you need with your essay and educational issues.

Get Access

Introduction of TOPIC

The speech that George W. Bush gave after the attacks on September 11th, 2001 was not only comforting, like the speech given by Ronald Reagan after the Challenger Tragedy, or the impromptu speech given by Robert Kennedy after the assassination of Martin Luther King, Jr., but also blazing with the clear message that America is strong, and that no matter what, we would overcome. While Ronald Reagan made clear the specific audiences he was addressing, George Bush made a bigger point of addressing the entire American nation, from the children of the victims, to the adults whose faith in this country had been so badly shaken. He wanted Americans to keep strong faith in our country, and not to worry about what was going to happen next. Reagan made many points in his speech about the bravery of the fallen astronauts, as well as the importance of the quest into unknown frontiers. Bush and Reagan both really tried to stress the importance of American people standing strong together, believing in our country, and not recoiling in the face of adversity.

Both presidents not only had very strongly worded speeches, but well delivered performances of them as well,

(especially Reagan, whose background as an actor always helped his charisma in front of the camera.)

Sorry, but full essay samples are available only for registered users

Choose a Membership Plan
Robert Kennedy’s speech in Indianapolis calmed down a potentially vicious racial situation, and helped people to stick together despite a great tragedy. President Bush went in sort of a different direction: The American people would stay strong together, and bring down any enemy that threatened our freedom or safety. Robert Kennedy was addressing tension between black people and white people living in the same country, while President Bush was addressing the American citizens in the face of an overwhelming attack from a foreign country. Kennedy’s message was one centering on love, compassion and understanding, while Bush was stressing the importance of freedom, American pride, and most importantly, justice. George Bush really shows that he understands his audience.

He really sparked a flame in the American public that made everyone feel extremely patriotic and protective of his or her country. His words were strong, and his inflection was perfectly appropriate. The repeated use of words like ‘justice’ and ‘freedom’ really installed a sense of pride in the audience he was addressing. Those words really needed to be heard in such a fragile time. Like Martin Luther King, Jr., he used very descriptive language and painted a hopeful picture when he said, “Terrorist attacks can shake the foundations of our biggest buildings, but they cannot touch the foundation of America. These acts shatter steel, but they cannot dent the steel of American resolve.” The attacks on 9/11 were the first time America had been targeted on our own native soil since the devastating Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor in the 1940’s. George Bush recognized what a delicate situation it was, and delivered a speech with wonderfully appropriate messages of not only patriotic nationalism, but with a clearly threatening message to any force that dare oppose America. This delicate balance of assuring safety and threatening enemies is what truly makes President George Bush’s 9/11 Address to the Nation one of the greatest speeches of all time.

We can write a custom essay on

Bush’s 9/11 Address Compares to Reagan’ ...
According to Your Specific Requirements.

Order an essay

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

President Bush' Second Inaugural Address

On a warmer-than-average day in early 2005, President George W. Bush gave his second inaugural address in front of the US Capitol and witnessed by thousands in person and perhaps millions around the world.  During this speech, President Bush discussed both his ideals as Chief Executive as well as his aims for his second term in office.  In reviews written days and weeks after the Inauguration, journalists wrote reviews that painted President Bush as both hero and villain.  In particular, Peggy Noonan of the Wall Street Journal and Tristram Hunt of Britain’s Guardian newspaper wrote reviews of this momentous speech that were critical of President Bush, but in differing ways.  Both editorialists speak to historical examples in their review of President Bush, but it is the difference in those examples that sets the reviews apart. Using evident sarcasm, Tristram Hunt began his review of President Bush’ second inaugural address by...

Bushes War On Terrorism

        The War on Terrorism, initiated by the United States Government’s Bush Administration in a direct response to the terrorist attacks that took place September 11, 2001,  has made consistent progress in its fight against terrorism, as this lengthy struggle has led to the major improvements with homeland security, provided the opportunity to improve technology geared towards preventing further attacks and calculated military actions that led to the capture or killing of violent radical terrorists waging war on our country.      September 11, 2001 marked the worst attack on American soil in United States’ history, as approximately 3,000 US citizens were killed during a series of terrorist suicide attacks.  Terrorist hijackers took control of four commercial airline flights filled with passengers from the United States and other countries only to lead these individuals to their untimely death.  Two of the planes were flown into the World Trade Center, one plane...

George W. Bush’s Iraqi Policy

Introduction It is true that there are many reasons that were advanced by George W. Bush and his administration to make the War in Iraq legit. It was for instance, explained by Bush and Chiney that Iraq under the tutelage of Saddam Hussein, was a repository of dangerous artilleries and Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMDs). The same Bush Administration advanced that Saddam Hussein’s rule was full of a catalogue of vices akin to human rights abuse and contravention. The most paramount reason that was put forward by this Bush Administration was that Saddam Hussein was guilty of being a bedfellow with Islamic terrorist groups such as the Hezbollah, Hamas and above all, the Al Qaeda. These reasons were the same reasons that were advanced in the UN Assembly. Although the UN Assembly advised against the Second Gulf War, the US, UK and Spain went on ahead to stage the war...

Popular Essays


Emma Taylor


Hi there!
Would you like to get such a paper?
How about getting a customized one?