We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

Can Moral Absolutism Be Justified? Essay Sample

essay
  • Pages: 4
  • Word count: 1,036
  • Rewriting Possibility: 99% (excellent)
  • Category: morality

Get Full Essay

Get access to this section to get all help you need with your essay and educational issues.

Get Access

Introduction of TOPIC

There are arguments to suggest that moral absolutism cannot be justified as it is not a reasonable solution to any ethical situation.

The theory of moral relativism upholds that there are no universally valid moral principles, opposing the theory of moral absolutism. Relative morals can change according to the situation, where as absolutism leaves no flexibility for certain situations. Some would put forward the view that examining an ethical situation from a teleological point of view is a greater means of deciding how to act than absolutism. Teleological ethics explain that actions are right or wrong depending on the outcome; the outcome of an action is not taken into account in the principles of moral absolutism therefore this could be seen as a weakness. Problems in disregarding the consequences of a moral action could arise in certain situations, such as the absolutist decision that the intentional taking of a human life is always wrong, even in situations where the taking of one human life is required to save others.

For example, a moral absolutist could argue against the termination of a pregnancy, even if it is necessary to save the mother’s life, where as a teleological position on this situation is likely to accept the value of the mother’s life over that of the unborn child. Furthermore, some believe the principles of utilitarianism should be applied when making a moral decision, as this takes into account the consequences of an action in order to achieve the greatest amount of happiness possible for all people involved. Achieving happiness could be seen as the ultimate purpose in life therefore by taking a moral absolutist view this purpose is often unable be achieved.

The practise of situation ethics also takes into account the outcome of an action and opposes that of moral absolutism, as making moral conclusions according to situation ethics relies only on the principle of love or agape. To do what is most loving in a situation may be seen as of higher importance that doing something just because it is believed to be intrinsically right. This is prominent in the teachings of Jesus Christ.

Another weakness in the appliance of moral absolutism is the disagreement it could cause amongst different cultures. What is

seen as morally acceptable in one culture may be frowned upon in another, for example it is the norm

Sorry, but full essay samples are available only for registered users

Choose a Membership Plan
in some cultures for a man to take more than one wife, where as in most western cultures this is seen as immoral. Cultural relativism maintains that truth itself is relativist and all beliefs are equally valid. The cultural diversity of our world makes it difficult to establish universal morals which every culture should follow, and if the people of a particular culture are content then we should not impose our own morals on them, as we are each a product of our own culture, narrowing our views of what is right or wrong. The fact that the world is constantly changing also means that morals could be seen as relative according to their historical context, and because of this absolute morals are not likely to survive.

Additionally, the controversy in meta-ethics makes moral absolutism unfeasible, as there is no universally accepted definition of right and wrong. What one person describes as right is always subject to disagreement amongst others, therefore it is impossible to agree on absolute moral principles which everyone should uphold. Although most religions have basic guidelines as to what is right or wrong, it is impossible to know the will of God or the gods in every situation.

Alternatively, there are reasons to dispute that moral absolutism cannot be justified, some believe that having absolute standards sufficient way to judge moral questions. This argument has its strengths, one being that it gives a fixed ethical code to measure actions by, so that it is possible to know what is the right thing to do in most situations. In some circumstances it may be difficult to judge what the consequences of a certain actions will be, so by having moral guidelines it makes it feasible to decide on a morally good action.

Furthermore, some actions are almost unanimously agreed to be right or wrong. An example of this would be rape as most would agree that rape is morally unjustifiable in any situation and therefore wrong. In this case absolutism makes the judgment easier and does not allow for any individual to try and justify the act. It could therefore be suggested that it is in our innate knowledge that rape is wrong, so by using our inherent knowledge and reasoning it is possible to decide whether all actions are right or wrong. This worldwide awareness of right and wrong is exemplified in the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights, in which a set of rules for multiple nations to live by is established.

In response to the idea of cultural relativism one could argue that moral absolutism enables us to effectively judge the actions of another culture, and if all cultures followed this absolute reasoning everyone would have a greater standard of moral living. Cultural relativism could be used as an excuse to act immorally and by having a set of moral absolutes this is made unjustifiable.

Moreover, in many religions a set of moral absolutes is provided by the deity, therefore by obeying these fundamental principles of right or wrong a person is seen as living a morally good life in the eyes of God, and to go against them because of circumstances or consequences is sinful. As God issued the rules by which mankind should follow, they must be perfect since God is perfect.

In conclusion, I agree with the statement that moral absolutism cannot be justified, as moral absolutism is too inflexible in it’s principles to allow exceptions in extreme situations, such as where the life of a human being is concerned.

We can write a custom essay on

Can Moral Absolutism Be Justified? Essay Sample ...
According to Your Specific Requirements.

Order an essay

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

Three Views on Morality

Mrs Birling is a confident and prideful women with some public influence. She sits in charity organisations and is described as a “a rather cold woman,” and her husband’s “social superior.” Mrs Birling is the only one in the play who does not seem to realise her responsibilities. She thinks that different classes behave a certain way and lacks of empathy-how people live. This is shown in the quote “a girl of that class.”The word ‘that class’ conveys how she looks down upon lower classes treating them less than human. It also shows she is judgmental and thinks that she is more socially and morally superior. She makes the audience see how the class division was in the 1912 and how awful life was for the lower classes. Mrs Birling does not feel any sympathy towards Eva as she does not accept any responsibility. This is shown in the quote....

The Trouble with the Birlings and Gerald...

The Birlings are an upper class family living in pre-war England; they think very highly of themselves and are quite shallow minded. They concentrate centrally on material possessions. The Birlings live in a well-established and comfortable home, which is richly furnished, yet does not have a hint of homeliness or a sign of family life in it. Throughout the play there are symbols used to create the air of wealth, such as the Port they drink, and the careless way they talk about golf. It is obvious that they are rich and used to being that way. You could never call the Birlings anything but respectable; they consider social status as an extremely serious matter. However they seem to confuse respectability with morality; no matter what they do it is only their own benefit or enjoyment. Even Mrs Birling's charitable works do not seem genuinely to be because she cares...

Animal Experimentation

Examine and consider religious and ethical responses to animal experimentation One philosopher that strongly is against animal testing is Peter Singer; he became involved after studying the work of Jeremy Bentham. He is most famously known for his book named animal liberation which states that The Institute of national health spent over $11 million on experiments that involved direct manipulation of the brain, over $5 million on experiments that studied the effects drugs have on behaviour, almost $3 million on learning and memory experiments, and over $2 million on experiments involving sleep deprivation, stress, fear, and anxiety. This government agency spent more than $30 million dollars on animal experiments in one year. This surely arises the question of how can these things happen? How can people who are not sadists spend their working days driving monkeys into lifelong depression, heating dogs to death, or turning cats into drug addicts? How...

Popular Essays

logo

Emma Taylor

online

Hi there!
Would you like to get such a paper?
How about getting a customized one?