When you are writing collaboratively, how does one determine whether an argument represents one’s own position? Sticking to your position while writing collaboratively can be tricky, often times it can be downright impossible. To ensure that one maintains its own position it is important to know well and to constantly stick to your position. You can pretty well guarantee that your portion of the paper is a reflection of yourself and your views by sticking by them and being sure to give support for those ideas. On the other hand what is it that causes or allows a team member to support an argument that he or she does not find credible? Does this lack of individual support weaken the final paper? Why or why not? You may not find the issue a credible one, but that does not mean that you should be unable to admit when a solid point is made. The difference being that if you do not find a point credible maybe you go on the attack and decide to tear the opposing team apart. Or , and this being the most likely, some people find it hard to disagree with a person based mainly on the respect they have for their team that they simply state that. Though it is a lacking point, it is of sound judgment and solid character.
Also individuals often have a strong emotional connection to the positions they argue in essays. Do teams have a similarly intense connection? If not, what fills this role for teams? In team writing it’s not just about the solo person, it is about the group as a whole. It is much harder to write an eight hundred word essay when you have to do them alone. On the flipside of the coin you do much more work on the paper and the structure of the essay itself when your with a partner because after you pitch an idea one person in the group may take it for a ride and pass it on the next student they give their two cents and before you know it the essay is done. Every team wants to do well and to connect on one level for another so too do they design winning plans or make the sacrifices to their respect team member. So yea I do believe that team writings share the same intensity. A topic some find hard is what are the correct methods of peer review to do the best job of evaluating the quality of a paper’s argument?
I feel that the professional peer review will do the best job at evaluating the quality of a paper’s argument. Professional peer review focuses on the performance of professionals, with a view to improving quality, upholding standards, or providing certification(“Peer Review”, 2012). This is because a professional peer review goes over every inch of that paper and does not skip a beat. If any method of peer review should be able to break down the quality of a paper it would be this one. The attention to detail is what sold me on this decision, paying much close attention ensures that an argument is heard not just passed along the line of other mindless zombies of our day.Whenever you are writing collaboratively, what is the best processes for making sure sections of a project written by different team members are logically consistent? When writing collaboratively it is always good to split up the tasks within a team. The team should state what they will be doing as a person and what task are they each in charge of. This should include what the final assignment should be and how it will all come together.
It is always good to let the team know about the deadline of the assignment and how often should they post their work and how it is coming along.Now how does the process of evaluating a team paper for plagiarism differ from the process of evaluating one’s own work? The process of evaluating a team paper for plagiarism differs from checking your own work because you have to research another person’s sources in the paper. This is so you can know that their sources are reliable and the information they used was accurate. If they just copied all of what was in the source, then they have committed plagiarism and this will have to be corrected. Unlike grading your own paper, you have to take the time to review someone else’s work and check it carefully. When you look at your own work, you already know the information included in it and the elements you used to write your paper. Next, what team writing processes produce the strongest arguments? The team writing processes that produce the strongest arguments are when the team revises and drafts.
This makes the paper turn out stronger because revising helps a paper to be checked for grammatical issues, punctuation, if the paper’s claims and evidence are clear and informative, and if the paper flows right throughout the whole writing. This makes the paper have finishing touches to make it well written. How do the topics selected for individual argument papers differ from those chosen for team papers? Do those differences imply a qualitative difference between the two types of writing? As you analyze the relationship between collaboration and argument, you must support your claims through research. (If you choose, you may include examples from personal experience.)
Topics selected for individual argument papers differ from those chosen for the team papers because they are specifically assigned for the whole group to be able to put all their input on it. When a person writes a paper for themselves, they are just writing for their side on the topic and what the topic is about. A group, when writing a paper, has to evaluate the source as a team and make it be written with the ideas of the group as a whole. These differences in the end, make a paper be written differently since the paper can have more different views from a group than if it was written for one person.