We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

Comparative Legal History Essay Sample

essay
  • Pages: 5
  • Word count: 1,102
  • Rewriting Possibility: 99% (excellent)
  • Category: history law

Get Full Essay

Get access to this section to get all help you need with your essay and educational issues.

Get Access

Introduction of TOPIC

Question One:

The main issue in this scenario is whether Jacob has a remedy for the damage done to his land caused by the rainwater runoff from the neighbouring restaurant’s sculpture.

Roman Law:

In Roman law, there is the actio aquae pluviae arcendae, which imposed liability for damage produced by rainwater.[1] The defendant had to have built a structure that caused the rainwater to damage the plaintiff’s land. The remedy was for the defendant to remove the structure causing harm and pay damages to the plaintiff. In Jacob’s situation this action would apply because damages resulted from rainwater runoff from the sculpture. Hence Jacob would receive damages from his neighbours as well as ensure the sculpture’s removal.

English Law:

In English Law, there is private nuisance, which is “the unreasonable and unjustified intervention by the defendant in the use of his land with the plaintiff’s right to enjoy his property.”[2] The ways judges decide whether an act constitutes a nuisance are by looking at the duration, extent and type of disturbance, the type of neighbourhood, the motivation and offensiveness. The remedy for an action of nuisance is either an injunction or a payment of damages.[3] In this case the type and the extent of disturbance must be viewed. Flooding a neighbours land constitutes a nuisance according to Sedleigh-Denfield v O’Callaghan.[4] Since Jacob’s land was damaged by the rainwater runoff that caused erosion, making it difficult to plant his vineyard, he would use the remedy of claiming for damages from the restaurant.

Question Two:

Here, there are two issues requiring remedies: the disturbances from the neon sign, movement of club patrons and the noise and the unsavoury people that the club attracts because of the nature of the business.

Roman Law:

Roman Law has no remedies for the issues Michaela is facing due to Rebels Inc. Roman society was different from South Africa’s; therefore it is apparent that it did not have laws that would apply to every part of our society and all the modern issues that it faces. It provided actions for specific issues leaving gaps where other issues were not dealt with. It usually provided remedies for issues causing physical damage but not antisocial behaviour. Thus, issues like Michaela’s that are mainly to do with antisocial behaviour were not provided for in Roman Law.

English Law: English Law has much more to say about Michaela’s

Sorry, but full essay samples are available only for registered users

Choose a Membership Plan
situation. In establishing whether the first issue of disturbances is a nuisance the reasoning of judges in similar case must be viewed. In St. Helen’s Smelting Co. v Tipping,[5] Lord Westbury reasons that the determining factor of whether personal inconvenience is grounds for nuisance depends upon the neighbourhood in which the act occurs. He says that certain inconveniences are expected in particular areas. Since Michaela is living in a run down area in the city centre , these sorts of disturbances are expected in the area and would appear not to be a nuisance.

There are grounds for nuisance for the issue regarding the people the club attracts after hours. In Laws v Florinplace Ltd.,[6] the sex centre attracted “unbalanced and perverted” people causing an affront to the area resulting in nuisance. Since these people do not attend the club it would appear that the club holds no responsibility but, according to Sedleigh-Denfield[7], if a nuisance is continued by someone who ought to have been aware of it then he is liable. The club owners ought to have been aware and are liable in nuisance. The remedy for this would be an injunction.

Question Three:

There are two issues in this scenario. The first is whether Lee-Ann can get a remedy for the abstraction of water of the underground stream that feeds her lake. The second is whether she has remedy against the potential collapse of her wall as a result of the borehole.

Roman Law:

In Roman law there is no specific action for the abstraction of underground water as a result of digging a borehole on one’s own land. This was because it was seen as normal use of one’s land. Therefore, Lee-Ann would have no remedy for her lake drying up as a result of Mohamed’s borehole.

There is the damnum infectum remedy that provides for potential losses that may occur by restricting otherwise legitimate activities on a neighbour’s land.[8] A person would get a promise from his neighbour giving him indemnity if loss occurred as a result of construction. Therefore, Lee-Ann would be able to use the damnum infectum remedy if Mohamed’s borehole caused the collapse of her wall.

English Law:

In English Law, acts are determined to be nuisance according to case law and judicial discretion. Lee-Ann’s lake dries up as a result of Mohamed abstracting the water caused by the borehole. In deciding whether this constitutes nuisance cases must be examined. Chasemore v Richards[9] deals with a similar factual scenario where the judge held that this sort of act is not a nuisance reasoning that the borehole was dug on the defendant’s own land and it was his right to do what he pleased with it. Lord Halsbury ruled similarly in Bradford Corporation v Pickles,[10] deciding in favour of the defendant. In this situation, Lee-Ann would have no remedy from Mohamed because his act did not constitute a nuisance.

English Law, however, does not provide for the second situation of the potential of the wall collapsing due to the digging of the borehole. This is because English Law does not have a remedy for a potential damage. The damage would have to occur already for there to be a claim in nuisance or negligence.

———————–
[1] David Johnston Roman Law in Context (1999) 72.
[2] Sedleigh-Denfield v O’Callaghan [140] AC 880.
[3] Miller v Jackson [1977] QB 966.
[4] Supra note 2.
[5] (1865) 11 H.L. Cas. 642 (H.L.).
[6] [1981] 1 All E.R. 659 (Ch.).
[7] Supra note 2.
[8] Supra note 1 at 73.
[9] (1859) 7 HL Cas 349.
[10] [1895-1899] All ER Rep 984.

We can write a custom essay on

Comparative Legal History Essay Sample ...
According to Your Specific Requirements.

Order an essay

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

A Brief Look At The History Of...

Throughout the history of civilization man has often made monuments in many varied forms symbolic of the cultures they live in. These monuments are usually represented through arts of architecture, landscaping, painting, and sculpture. These diverse forms of art have their own unique qualities, all of which can be accented with sculpture in some way. As sculpture usually relates closely to the other arts in expression and style, it still relies on all of the social aspects of the society in which it resides for its meaning and purpose. The three-dimensional and long-lasting qualities contribute to the wide use of sculpture as a cultural expression of the beliefs and ideals of man. Mostly these beliefs are displayed in varied forms such as designs or decorative additions like religious symbols of idols or gods, civic leaders, beings of myth or legend and other figures historically or socially significant to the society...

13th And 14th Century Motets

The motet is hardly a term that can be defined in brief. It is a word that requires a descriptive analysis for each time period. Throughout its history, the motet has taken on several different forms and ideas. A significant difference in the definition of the motet can be seen between the 13th and 14th centuries. It is appropriate to begin in the 13th century, when the motet was originated. Originally, the motet was seen as a decoration of chant, for it was based on the sacred Latin texts of the Gregorian chant. In the early motet the tenor, or bottom voice, sang original Gregorian chant. In terms of form, it originated as a troped clausula. This changed in the 14th century when the idea of the motet was more secular, the tenor did not sing chant. The text was usually French and portrayed ideas of courtly love and satire....

A Troubled Paradise

Sovereignty is a sway favor of the omnipotent Almighty Allah to humankind; freedom, by all means, refers to human beings and to other creatures and does hold its magnitude in all aspects. It has widely been manifested by the human history that human beings have ever been striving for freedom, thus, the impression bands no dilemma in it as liberty stands to be the at heart right to all. It has been 70 years since the first shots were fired in the conflicted territory, Kashmir over its status which still remains undecided. Kashmir is a small region in the north of India; a part of the Jammu and Kashmir state which is the northernmost state in India, nestled in the foothills of the Himalayas, the Kashmir region is of great strategic importance and beauty which makes it a very prized possession. The conflict between India and Pakistan, two lands united...

Popular Essays

logo

Emma Taylor

online

Hi there!
Would you like to get such a paper?
How about getting a customized one?