We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

Compare the Natural Law Theory with Kant’s approach in relation to killing in war Essay Sample

  • Pages: 4
  • Word count: 1,087
  • Rewriting Possibility: 99% (excellent)
  • Category: ethics

Get Full Essay

Get access to this section to get all help you need with your essay and educational issues.

Get Access

Introduction of TOPIC

It is important to acknowledge that the theory of Natural Law is defined as absolute (whereby an action is regarded as right or wrong irrespective of differing circumstances or conditions) and deontological (which means that the moral value of an action is judged according to the intention and not the consequences), and is most closely associated with St. Thomas Aquinas, who developed the principles and advances of Aristotle, to produce a moral code (existing within the purpose of nature) which human beings are naturally inclined towards.

In addition, Aquinas maintained that the ‘moral life’ is lived according to reason, which is achieved by following the primary precepts which promote the principles of ‘self-preservation and the preservation of the innocent’, the ‘continuation of the species through reproduction’, the ‘education of children’, to ‘live in society’ and to ‘worship God’. Aquinas also acknowledged four ‘secondary precepts’ (do not murder, do not abort unborn, defend the defenceless and do not commit suicide) which are further rulings that human beings should avoid, as they do not uphold the primary precepts.

In view of this, it is possible to argue that in relation to killing during war, the theory of Natural Law would support military action if it upheld the principle of ‘self-preservation and the preservation of the innocent’, such as countering a real threat by another state or liberating a country where mass atrocities are being committed: the declaration of war against Germany in 1939; the Nazi extermination of the Jews; and the treatment of civilians under the rule of Idi Amin in Rwanda.

However, this raises a further issue, as it is therefore necessary to identify exactly who should be classified as a direct opponent – civilians of the aggressive state, workers in the ammunition factories and power stations – as Natural Law would regard the killing of innocent civilians (and prisoners of war) as unjust and a contradiction of the precepts.

As a result, it is evident that that there are various advantages to applying this theory to practical situations including the fact that it provides justification and support for complex issues such as human rights and equality (whilst condemning actions such as torture, irrespective of the consequences) and appeals to many people’s conviction that right and wrong depend on more than just personal opinion and social convention. However, one may also argue that this ethical theory do

es not take into account the direct consequences of such action and is also guilty of committing the

Sorry, but full essay samples are available only for registered users

Choose a Membership Plan
naturalistic fallacy.

In contrast, it is also significant to make reference to the absolute and deontological ethical theory advocated by Immanuel Kant, who argued (in The Metaphysics of Morals, 1797) that we are able to calculate the moral worth of an action in accordance to the Categorical Imperative – an unconditional command comprising of three principles informing human beings of their duty by directing them to actions which are good in themselves: The Universal Law (for an action to be morally valid, the agent must not carry it out unless he or she believes that, in the same situation, all people should act in the same way); Treat humans as end in themselves (never treat humans as a means to an end); and Act as if you live in a kingdom of ends (act as if you were a law-making member of a kingdom of ends).

Kant also considered that to act morally is to do one’s duty, which involved obeying the moral law, and maintained that human beings seek an ultimate end called the supreme good (the summun bonum) – a state in which human virtue and happiness are united. In the ‘Groundwork for the Metaphysic of Morals, 1785, Kant also declared that the highest form of good is good will, which involved following one’s duty to perform actions that are morally required, without a desire to promote self interest: “..the essence of morality is to be found in the motive from which the act is done alone…A good will is not good because of what it effects or accomplishes…it is good through its willing alone – that is, good in itself.”

From the above information, it is evident that Kant’s theory would condemn any form of killing during war, because it directly undermines the maxim of the categorical imperative, which states that people should never be treated as a ‘means to an end’ – an accepted principle during military conflict: for example, at present, Tony Blair risks the lives of the British armed forces in Iraq in order to overthrow the regime of Saddam Hussein. However, I would question whether Kant’s theory could be applied to such situations (as it appears to contradict itself), as he would also argue that we should always tell the truth (in order to maintain a civilised society) even if that consequently resulted in informing a murderer of the location of his next victim.

It is clear that there are many strengths associated with Kant’s theory, including the fact that it commands respect for human life, provides a set of powerful absolute principles (universal code) that prohibit acts that would be commonly considered wrong (such as murder/killing) and therefore corrects the atrocities that could be justified under a utilitarian approach – the moral value of an action comes from the intrinsic rightness in itself. However, Kant’s theory refuses to allow exceptions to different situations, and it could also be argued that a weakness with the concept of universalisability is the problem of different but similar dilemmas – are two moral dilemmas always the same?

In conclusion, although there are undoubtedly many intricate issues with regard to the subject of war, it is vital to consider the various arguments provided (including those above) such as the view that the ultimate principle should be to preserve life (W.D.Ross) and the conditions set out in the ‘just war’ theory. However, my personal view is that although I can acknowledge the arguments provided by idealist and realist thinkers, I believe that in order to justifiably conduct military action, it is necessary to establish an independent system where universal jurisdiction can be enforced, and which will provide an impartial hearing and sentence those accordingly – such as the United Nations.

We can write a custom essay on

Compare the Natural Law Theory with Kant’s a ...
According to Your Specific Requirements.

Order an essay

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

Business Ethics - International Trade Administration

As experts in business ethics, your expertise can be used to help breakdown a situation good or bad. In situations we can come in and erase the bad and replace with good or simple reinforce the good that is being done. In this case, we will be doing a lot of erasing for many reasons. This branch of the bank was not doing what it was supposed to in regards to protecting itself and following the country’s banking laws. “The actions cited included failing to put in effect measures to prevent money laundering, overcharging customers for financial derivative products and making loans that helped clients carry out a variety of improper deals, regulators said.” Acts like this are major unethical decisions that should never be made by employees of a bank. Such movements open up themselves as employees and the company to major back lash and trouble. All of that...

Ethical Issues in Business

Ethics is an area of study that deals with ideas about what is better and worse behavior. McDonald’s business is being governed by a clear code of ethics. Their staffs are committed and follow on its implementation. It is a promise to abide by the standards of business conduct. They promise to uphold integrity. Ethics is about our actions and decisions, Right vs. Wrong. The code of ethics of McDonald’s also pledges to resolve any private or public issues related to that of economic, political, social, financial and environmental problems (McDonald’s Corporation, 2006) Public ethics are what a person or a company claims or express publicly to others about its underlying values, intentions and motivations in a particular situation. Private ethics are the values, intentions and motivations of a person. Public and Private ethics may be the same, or they may be different. On the economic gains, McDonald’s has the...

Euthanasia: Ethics of euthanasia

The Ethics of Euthanasia Morality refers to the determination of right or wrong as upheld by a particular society or group of individuals. The contemporary moral issues related to the current problems that are of controversial nature and in which the community is evenly divided on the opinion they hold of right or wrong. Utilitarianism is one such concept in the field of normative ethics for the purposes of quantifying or justifying the moral standing of an issue within a community. Utilitarianism is a principle proposed by Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill in the 18th century leading to an early 19th century (Hinman 34). The law implies that an action is right if a majority of the people affected by it derive benefits from the work while an action is wrong if it will hurt more people. The pillars of measuring utilitarianism are intensity, duration, certainty or uncertainty, propinquity,...

Popular Essays


Emma Taylor


Hi there!
Would you like to get such a paper?
How about getting a customized one?