We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

Decision Making for a Successful Organization Essay Sample

essay
The whole doc is available only for registered users OPEN DOC

Get Full Essay

Get access to this section to get all help you need with your essay and educational issues.

Get Access

Decision Making for a Successful Organization Essay Sample

What type of decision making process did your group use to arrive at a consensus decision?

After much deliberation among the members, they finally settled on a consensus through the help of Nominal Group Technique, a face-to-face group process technique for achieving consensus. The group decided to make use of the NGT for organizational planning in allocating resources and funds. Moreover, the members thought NGT was a good idea because it does not permit a sole person to dominate the discussion. It was the choice for members who have repressed ideas (Sample, 1984).

In NGT, which can be an alternative for brainstorming, the group meets and discusses and shares all issues before the evaluation, where each member has an equal participation ( Mind Tools). Its advantage is that a single person does not dominate the discussion. Each member can participate in problem solving or other activities.

First, the group was divided and grouped into four or five members. A member or a group as a whole can state questions that require the members to think critically. Each person spent a few moments thinking of ideas and writing them down. Each group then collected the ideas by asking each person to respond. All of the members are allowed to clarify some questions but criticisms were not allowed. Each person also evaluated the ideas and anonymously voted for the idea that seemed best.

Sharing and tabulating of votes was done next. The group then prepared a report summarizing all the best ideas presented and each small group was allotted a few minutes to present the report.

  1. In what ways is the group decision making process different from the individual decision making process?

            There have been debates whether group decision making process is more appropriate than on the individual level. Many say that decision making in groups is slower and often results in less good decisions.

However, the group agreed that group decision making process is more advantageous than the individual decision making process. As the popular saying goes, two heads are better than one. Or, in the case of a group, more heads are better because more ideas are collected to choose from. More people can also think of better ways to solve a problem or offer possible alternatives.

Grigoriou comments that most organizations rely on groups to come up with good decisions. Vroom (1969) says that “groups are expected to produce decisions of higher quality with greater acceptance by their members” while looking for solutions to settle the differences among members.

Moreover, many probably believe in ‘collective wisdom’ which is the reason why many projects are handed over to groups (Blinder and Morgan).

  1. Did your group avoid or reduce group biases or errors? If yes, how? If no, why not or what happened?

            Although it is very easy to ignore the group biases or errors, the group chose to reduce them by not making any more errors the next time. The group also discussed during every meeting about these problems and brainstormed for the possible solutions to them. And in this area, group decision was utilized. Each member suggested or proposed, anonymously, and the best choice was chosen for further consideration.

            Through the Nominal Group Technique, the members became more active in every area where decision is needed. They became much bolder since NGT allows them to have anonymity during the meetings. The members also became much aware of the need to create solutions for problems that directly or even indirectly involve them. During one of the meetings, it was extensively discussed on how to reduce group biases or errors. They became more resolved to keep themselves from falling victims to group biases.

  1. What are the implications of social influence for individuals and organizations?

            An article that discusses social influence theories discussed the implications of social influence as having an important role in making people behave unselfishly, which means they consider the welfare of other people around them.

            Darley, et. al.(2001), say that social influence involves the principle of autonomy or freedom since it affects an influence relationship. When a person influences another, he wants to change the other’s attitudes and behavior or way of thinking.

            A good leader, for an instance, will influence his members to act accordingly and to change their perceptions for the better of all. When we talk about the implication of social influence on organizations, we talk about collective influence. As Darley says, it involves the principle of autonomy or freedom. When this is exercised within an organization, the members are freer to participate and to voice out for the betterment of the organization.

            Daley et. al added that “scholars have long been concerned about the ethical implication of the use of social influence by leaders of groups, organizations and nations.” This concern focused mainly on the influence of leaders on their followers.

            Several researches were also done and showed that directive leadership was the cause of poor decisions made, poor information processing and defective group interactions. Darley, et.al, also propose that the results of directive leadership were more of process defectiveness and not outcome defectiveness.

            They further suggest that leaders should exercise strong ethical influence on their members through the decision making process they use.

REFERENCES

Blinder, Alan S. and John Morgan. Are Two Heads Better Than One?:

An Experimental Analysis of Group vs. Individual Decisionmaking.

Darley, John, et.al. 2001. Social Influences On Ethical Behavior in Organizations. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Vroom, V. H. 1969. Industrial Social Psychology. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.)

Handbook of Social Psychology (2nd ed. Vol. 5).

Sample, John. 1984.Nominal Group Technique: An Alternative to Brainstorming. Tallahassee, Florida.

We can write a custom essay

According to Your Specific Requirements

Order an essay

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

Risk Analysis and Decision Making

Q1: Part A Risk administration is the method of recognising and proactively answering to project risks. Generally (but not always) you will gaze for modes to eradicate dangers or to minimize the influence of a risk if it occurs. A risk contingency budget can be established to arrange in accelerate for the likelihood that some dangers will not be organised successfully. The risk contingency budget...

Deriving Consensus Rankings Via Multicriteria Decision Making...

Purpose – This paper takes a cautionary stance to the impact of marketing mix on customer satisfaction, via a case study deriving consensus rankings for benchmarking on selected retail stores in Malaysia. Design/methodology/approach – ELECTRE I model is used in deriving consensus rankings via multicriteria decision making method for benchmarking base on the marketing mix model 4Ps. Descriptive analysis is used to analyze the best...

The Application of Decision Making Theory

Learning objectives 1. Understand basic control processes in decision-making, and develop appropriate control systems to support specific strategies 2. Identify and evaluate appropriate performance measures to properly assess performance 3. Recognise the importance and the impact of effective information systems in supporting decisions concerning evaluation and control 4. Describe the determinants of decision success and understand the decision making matrix 2 Introduction Text based sources...

The Importance of Data for Operations Management...

In order to be able to make well guided decisions, one needs well based facts and therefore one is in continuous need of quality data. The same goes for operations management; data of substance is a must to run a company in its optimal levels of efficiency, effectiveness and capacity. The five levels of Data Quality Maturity according to Gartner are Aware, Reactive, Proactive, Managed...

Explain the Approach of Situation Ethics to...

Situation ethics is a teleological approach to ethics based on the teachings of American Theologian Joseph Fletcher who thought it was unwise to follow fixed rules as it does not take the whole situation into account. It contrasts to the Roman Catholic Churches teaching of Natural Law where rules about right and wrong are deducted from the perceived divine purpose for individual acts and objects....

Get Access To The Full Essay
icon
300+
Materials Daily
icon
100,000+ Subjects
2000+ Topics
icon
Free Plagiarism
Checker
icon
All Materials
are Cataloged Well

Sorry, but copying text is forbidden on this website. If you need this or any other sample, we can send it to you via email.

By clicking "SEND", you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy. We'll occasionally send you account related and promo emails.

Your Answer Is Very Helpful For Us
Thank You A Lot!

logo

Emma Taylor

online

Hi there!
Would you like to get such a paper?
How about getting a customized one?