Drug Abuse in Society Essay Sample
- Word count: 1089
- Category: drugs
Get Full Essay
Get access to this section to get all help you need with your essay and educational issues.Get Access
Drug Abuse in Society Essay Sample
The amount of violence within society today is astounding and medical studies have proven to show acts of violence with relation to drug abuse. Drug abuse is regarded to as a personal and antisocial dependence which usually leads to a punishable offense by authorities. Social conflict theory and drug abuse would be considered a problem of inequality and class conflict. While drug abuse is a problem throughout society, a conflict theory would argue that minorities or lower class groups are more likely to suffer, because of the negative consequences from drug abuse. Sociologists can analyze with three main theoretical perspectives of functionalism, conflict, and interactionism with drug abuse and acts of violence. These sociological theories will help to understand substance abuse as a societal phenomenon, having cultural, social, and economic origins. These theories will not only explore the individual, but the social world that exists around them. Drug abuse through the view of a functionalist may view it as dysfunctional; a significant process within society when on disrupts the social system or disturbs its solidity.
The view of society is a complex system whose parts all work together to promote solidarity and stability. Drug abuse can be viewed as functional, because the drug abuse maintains the billion dollar industry along with employment of pharmaceutical companies, psychiatrists, and physicians who write and prescribe the medications and maintain rehabilitation centers. The focus is on society as a whole that can grow, create unity, cohesiveness, stability, and create fundamental necessities for social existence. Chaos, instability, and alienation will disrupt the society. Schaefer (2010) explained, “Talcott Parsons (1902–1979), a Harvard University sociologist, was a key figure in the development of functionalist theory.
Parsons was greatly influenced by the work of Émile Durkheim, Max Weber, and other European sociologists. Parsons saw any society as a vast network of connected parts, each of which helps to maintain the system as a whole. His functionalist approach holds that if an aspect of social life does not contribute to a society’s stability or survival—if it does not serve some identifiably useful function or promote value.” Along with the other theorists, Emile Durkheim was especially interested in how social order is possible or how society remains relatively stable. Once a society displays instability, the functioning of that society will become disrupted and will become viewed as unfavorable and not the norm. When drug related violence is exposed throughout a society, it will then become disrupted and unstable. Once a society has been disrupted and is unstable, it cannot function effectively and properly.
Sociologists view social conflict theories are within a broad area of inequality and conflict. The conflict theory arises over disparities, such as poverty, power, and group identity. Conflict theorists see society and its structure controlled by those who are educated, wealthier or with higher power that possess a greater economical class. These theorists are more macro oriented, and for society’s structure it is controlled by those with the greatest economic, social, and cultural assets. Because of Karl Marx’s work, sociologists and other social scientists have come to see conflict not as a class phenomenon, but as a part of everyday life in all societies. Schaefer (2010) explained, “Marx emphasized the group identifications and associations that influence an individual’s place in society.
Marx viewed relationships in systematic terms; that is, he believed that a system of economic, social, and political relationships maintained the power and dominance of the owners over the workers.” Conflict theory suggests a model of society existing into different groups with independent interests, and these groups compete for resources and power, while dominating and suppressing minority groups. This allows individuals to rise to positions of power publicly and privately, where they create structures that perpetuate their power as well as interests. Deviance and violence related to drug abuse is a response of alienating the inequality of certain groups of ethnicities and racial minorities. While substance abuse is generally omnipresent throughout society, social conflict would argue that minorities, the lower class, and other marginalized groups are more likely to suffer negative consequences as a result of drug abuse. Not all may experience inequality and resort to deviance, but those that do are either trying to change systems of inequality, or adopting alternative lifestyles and identities.
The Interactionist and its view on drug abuse is related to reducing the severity by advocacy with a restorative justice approach. This perspective takes on a more micro-level view of violence with drugs, and a more personal focus on social interaction in situations. Individuals involved have created their own social system. Interactionists would view drug use as an individual action. Schaefer (2010) explained, “Theorists who take the interactionist perspective generalize about everyday forms of social interaction in order to explain society as a whole.” A sociologist with this perspective would believe people act towards drugs and violence based on the meaning those things have for them; and these meanings are derived from social interaction and modified through interpretation.
Society is created and socially structured by the individuals. The results to this violence of drug abuse are with a theory of positive results and goals to restore health of the individual and community and its negative events, repair any injury, and to decriminalize a victim’s drug offenses with resolving and removing a criminal label altogether. The goal of interactionism is to reduce formal labeling and penalization of substance abusers with specifications to the factors that lead to drug abuse. This can greatly increase prevention rates and strategies that seek to eliminate drug abuse. An interactionist would view violence related to drug abuse is what it is labeled to be, or what people say it is. All in all, society and reality are what people make them.
Overall, it is crucial to spread awareness among others and the after effects of drugs throughout every society. Not only should societies be aware of the negative effects drug abuse can have, but the violence that can created along with it. This issue is imperative whether you are analyzing the situation through the functionalist theory, conflict theory, or interactionist theory. Through the eyes of a functionalist, interactionist, conflict theory, we can either work together, exist into different groups, or reduce formal labeling and penalization. No matter if the issue is being viewed by the individual’s actions, a product of inequality, or a necessary part of society serving some purpose, drug abuse and violence is a very serious issue that needs to be resolved within every society.