We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

Ethical and Legal Issues Revolving Essay Sample

The whole doc is available only for registered users OPEN DOC

A limited time offer!

Get a custom sample essay written according to your requirements urgent 3h delivery guaranteed

Order Now

Ethical and Legal Issues Revolving Essay Sample

A civil action film is a based on true life experiences that revolve around the good scenarios and issues that are bound to be tried by legal bodies. It is based on the true stories that were taking part in the year 1980s when the environmental pollution took place and better parts of Woburn. There was the ethical issue revolving around the film as there was a corporate body that was using the trichloroethylene product which is the industrial solvent and uses it to contaminate the aquifer of the area that the plaintiff was residing.

Therefore the film is based on the two larger firms that are damaging the environment through pollution in M.A. The ethical issue that the plaintiff presents in the court is the value that the dollar holds in comparison to the well-being of the human life (Crane & Matten, 2016). The two larger firms that are being questioned in the legal bodies are accused of polluting the water bodies that are found in Woburn, the plaintiffs who are Beatrice and Grace says that the firm is responsible for the death of 12 children who dies as a result of the pollution arising from such firms.

The act of the business producing pollutants without considering the consequences of such pollutants is completely unethical at all costs. In the film, it is depicted that the businesses are only looking for the ways that they can maximize their profit without considering the impact of their activities on the environment and those who are residing near that environment. The two companies that are unethical in their acts, the W.R Grace and also J Riley Leather are throwing some of the bad product down the rivers.

The products or the wastes that they are throwing are completely not bio-degradable, and hence it may take decades or centuries for such products to completely decompose and their threats to end at all; note that most of those solvent materials are labeled as being carcinogenic, yet the firms are throwing them anyhow. The act is unethical, and therefore the firm is seen as careless and that they are not taking into consideration their acts and the effect that they will be having on the individuals who are around them (Banks, 2016).

It is also unethical that the firm is trying to act innocent on such allegations through trying hard that the court should find them as being culpable as possible. Therefore the firm to accomplish the mission thy goes a step further to pay the amount of the money that Jan and also his other partners are requiring so that they can make the firms to look more culpable. The firms are both attentive in their deeds, and also the byproducts that they are producing for their firms are very poisonous and carcinogen to the greater extent. The act of the firm trying to conceal some of their deeds from polluting already usable water is very unethical, and the firm is doing nothing but trying to hide the act.

The firm is very unethical as despite proving that the contaminated water is affecting the health of those using the water, they are trying and keeps on denying the allegations that the chemicals that they are producing are being alerted to the city’s drinking waters. The firms are trying to conceal their deeds despite the fact that there are some of the evidence that is presented in the court; for example, the death of 8 girls in the city as a result of drinking the water that is already contaminated with the chemical wastes from the firms. It is unethical if the firm would have tried to change the situation through the act of creating other channels to distribute their water channels or trying to tidy up the already interfered with water channels. However, the firms being very unethical in their practices the chose none of the proper ways to address the situations which is very unethical around the business environment.

Despite the fact that trying to solve the problem of environmental would be a cheaper one, the firm tries to pay Jan $69.4 million as the case cleanup. The firms are in a position to know that they will be a position to act within the request of the Jan and they are ready and more than willing to act on the suggestions that are raised. Despite the agreement, the firm takes another route as they are considering the image of the firm and hence they refuse to pay for the agreement in considerations to the image that the firm will be unveiling to the members of the public.

The firms would have followed what ethical relativism or the act of utilitarianism as the results would favor both of them; firm and also the members of the public is. Many unethical activities arise from the operations of the company in reality. Most of the firm is always looking on the profit side of the operations leaving the environmental side to continue dying and eroding continuously. The firms, therefore, are seen as unethical and hence deserve the trial by the legal bodies.

The movie is imperative as it tries to unveil to us the sense of the justice in another sense. The basic thing that runs in our mind is that the evil side of the plan should be overcome by the good deeds. The parents who are agitated by the firms that are powerful damaging the aquifers of the Woburn city-states and hence in turns costing the lives of 8 girls. The firm is taken to court on the account that most of their deeds are unethical and needs a court intervention because they are dumping some of the materials that are toxic into the water sources of the city hence endangering the lives of the individuals residing in the town.

The movie shows the other side of the court and the legal system that is darker in comparison to our expectations. Jan at first refuses the case seeing that the case will have no larger layoff, it shows that most of the individuals in the firm laws are not interested in passing the judgment or justice but tries to see that they are fully benefiting on the same. However, when Jan realizes that the extent to which the firms have damaged the environment.

There could be more income on it, and therefore the case ends up being costly, and thus Jan’s Small law firm’s ends up accruing a lot of debt. Despite the fact that the case ends up with the compensation o about 8 million dollars, those that have presented the evidence such as Anne Anderson did not feel any form of being content with the judgments as those who caused the mayhem in the city were not brought forward to apologize to the city residents. Jan while trying to make the legal system works; he almost lost all the personal property that he owns (Harr, 2011).

On the second trial, it’s when Jan finds some of the evidence that may try to see that the firm comes to sense and ensure that the right judgment is passed on them. He is, therefore, able to uncover an additional piece of information about the two firms; J.R. Riley and Beatrice Foods. He, therefore, forwards the two of the files from the older as and the newer findings to the Environmental Protection Agency that will soon sue the two firms.

The EPA was trying to try the case at the court; the case was business related one. The case was worn by the EPA, and the two firm J.R. Riley and Beatrice Foods ends up paying a lump sum amount of money that will ensure that the city of Woburn is cleaned (Harr, 2011).
The movie is quite an informative one to relate the ethical issues that are revolving around us in reality. The movie is covering most of the moral issues that are occurring around ethical issues and the legal system of the courts. It is through the film that I learn that the legal procedure is quite expensive, to acquire a lawyer. Firms, therefore, should look at environmental impact while they are doing their daily operations.

Banks, T. L. (2016). Civil Trials: A Film Illusion. Fordham L. Rev., 85, 1969. Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2016). Business ethics: Managing corporate citizenship and sustainability in the age of globalization. Oxford University Press. Harr, J. (2011). A civil action. New York: Vintage eBooks.

We can write a custom essay

According to Your Specific Requirements

Order an essay
Get Access To The Full Essay
Materials Daily
100,000+ Subjects
2000+ Topics
Free Plagiarism
All Materials
are Cataloged Well

Sorry, but copying text is forbidden on this website. If you need this or any other sample, we can send it to you via email.

By clicking "SEND", you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy. We'll occasionally send you account related and promo emails.
Sorry, but only registered users have full access

How about getting this access

Become a member

Your Answer Is Very Helpful For Us
Thank You A Lot!


Emma Taylor


Hi there!
Would you like to get such a paper?
How about getting a customized one?

Can't find What you were Looking for?

Get access to our huge, continuously updated knowledge base

The next update will be in:
14 : 59 : 59
Become a Member