We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

Explain Plato’s Use of the Metaphor of the Shadows in his Allegory of the Cave Essay Sample

  • Pages: 3
  • Word count: 738
  • Rewriting Possibility: 99% (excellent)
  • Category: plato

Get Full Essay

Get access to this section to get all help you need with your essay and educational issues.

Get Access

Introduction of TOPIC

Plato was a Philosopher who used a story based on people imprisoned in a cave to explain the way in which he thought humans formed ideas based on their senses.

The story is known as ‘the Allegory of the Cave’ and is one of Plato’s most famous passages. The allegory has different meanings at different levels; therefore there is not just a single moral in this story.

Plato believed that there were two worlds, the world of appearance, the world we are in, and another world known as reality – a world we were all in before we entered the world of appearance, however we can’t remember it. Plato suggests that the body is a kind of prison in which the soul is trapped.

The allegory begins with several prisoners tied up and trapped in a cave with little light. Plato uses this to show how he feels the soul is trapped in the body, as if it were imprisoned. The only light comes from a small fire, which is also used as a projector to show images of puppets on a wall in front of where the prisoners are positioned. The prisoners are only aware of one thing in the cave, the shadows created by the puppets. They believe that the shadows are a form of real life; to them they are real images but according to Plato they are very mistaken. The prisoners have lived in the cave all their lives and know no different.

Plato uses this to show how we buil

d up knowledge based on what we see. As the prisoners have never know any other form of life or even

another world they are forced into thinking that there experience is normal, because that is all that their senses have ever experienced. Furthermore, Plato claims that the prisoners would assume that the echoes made by the people came from the shadows of the puppets, and that these echoes would also be taken as reality.

As is now evident, the shadows are highly (and deliberately) analogous to everyday beliefs held to be true by the majority of people, which in reality are no more than mere illusions. Plato is here demonstrating, by use of the shadows, what he believes to be the lower level of intellect, i.e. belief, as opposed to the higher level of intellect, i.e. knowledge {or dialect}.

Question 2: On what grounds might Plato’s understanding of human knowledge be criticised?

Plato’s understanding of human knowledge may be criticised on a number of grounds, the first and most fundamental of which in my opinion, would be the abstractness of his theory of knowledge, specifically, the theory of the forms. Many may argue that the idea of having a non-temporal, non-spatial, universally perfect form for every object in the phenomenal world is, quite plainly, ridiculous, on the grounds that ‘perfect form’ is only relative to the person or standard judging that form. Take for example, Plato’s perfect form of beauty. We see numerous examples in everyday life of people’s perceptions, and differences of opinion in matters of beauty; in relation to art, sexual partners, cars, in fact almost anything. The idea that the amount of beauty in the above things can be agreed upon by every single person seems absurd enough, never mind the absurdity of a ‘universal’ form of beauty being agreed upon.

The elitism of Plato’s understanding may also be criticised, as it may seem immoral to some because of the arrogance portrayed by him. What Plato is actually claiming is that only a tiny minority of people like himself have true understanding, and that the rest are ignorant and wrong. Plato’s attitude is summed up by his quotation of Homer, to illustrate his point, effectively saying how he would rather be a ‘surf in the house of some landless man than live and think as they do’. A further criticism would be that Plato’s understanding of knowledge has no practical relevance, as it gives no indication or guide as to how to achieve the higher levels of intellect or, more importantly, how to apply his theory to the moral field of making everyday decisions.

Sorry, but full essay samples are available only for registered users

Choose a Membership Plan

We can write a custom essay on

Explain Plato’s Use of the Metaphor of the S ...

According to Your Specific Requirements.

Order an essay

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

A Life Sketch of Plato and His...

If Thales was the first of all the great Greek philosophers, Plato must remain the best known of all the Greeks. The original name of this Athenian aristocrat was Aristiclis, but in his school days he received the nickname "Platon" (meaning "broad") because of his broad shoulders. Plato was born in Athens, Greece to one of the oldest and most distinguished families in the city. He lived with his mother, Perictione, and his father, Ariston (Until Ariston died. ) Born in an aristocratic and rich family, Plato's childhood was indulged within luxury. But his life changed when he came across Socrates. Socrates, a Greek philosopher who lived from 470-399 BC. He devoted all his time with young citizens discussing philosophy and questioning their confidence in the truth of popular opinions. As a young man, Plato grew up wanting to be a politician. However, after Socrates' execution in 399 BC had...

A Review of Plato’s Meno

Plato presents in his dialogue, titled Meno, the distinction between genuine knowledge and true opinion. In the text, he refers to knowledge as the form and definition of something that is changeless, where as true opinion can be altered and is not restricted in the way knowledge is by having standards of a form. Plato includes the characters of Socrates and Meno, a pupil of Gorgias, to discuss the nature of virtue and knowledge. The dialogue is provoked by Meno posing the question: How will you look for [virtue], Socrates, when you do not know at all what it is? How will you aim to search for something you do not know at all? If you should meet with it, how ill you know that this is the thing that you did not know?  (Meno 80d). Socrates begins his discussion with Meno by comparing himself to a torpedo fish, which...

Plato and Aristotle: An Introduction to Greek...

Since Socrates, what is the political significance of "reason" for the meaning of virtue for Plato and Aristotle? In other words, what role does reason and virtue play in politics, citizenship, and the formation of a good or just society? And, how does Aristotle's view differ from Plato's? In an effective political system, reason and virtue are very important. For the formation of a good society, one must incorporate justice and equality into it and this cannot be done without reason and virtue. The people of a certain society or political system must have the quality of honesty in them and they should also have a sound reasoning for a better understanding and analysis of what is happening around them. Plato and Aristotle are the most eminent Greek philosophers who have studied and worked on ethics, politics, science etc. Plato, being the student of Socrates and Aristotle, being the student...

Popular Essays


Emma Taylor


Hi there!
Would you like to get such a paper?
How about getting a customized one?