We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

Explain the Approach of Situation Ethics to Moral Decision Making Essay Sample


Get Full Essay

Get access to this section to get all help you need with your essay and educational issues.

Get Access

Introduction of TOPIC

Situation ethics is a teleological approach to ethics based on the teachings of American Theologian Joseph Fletcher who thought it was unwise to follow fixed rules as it does not take the whole situation into account. It contrasts to the Roman Catholic Churches teaching of Natural Law where rules about right and wrong are deducted from the perceived divine purpose for individual acts and objects. Situation ethics is based on four working principles pragmatism, relativism, positivism and personalism.

The first principle is pragmatism which is the practical action to bring about the most loving end. His second principle is relativism meaning that there is no fixed rules in regards to moral decision making. He also believed in positivism, this is when people freely choose their faith and believed that since the Christian God is a personal God that morality should be more compassionate and person-centred. His final working principle is personalism which is the belief of that people are more important than rules which is based on jesus’ teaching of ‘People before rules’ which he always followed and taught throughout his life.

These four working principles guide people in making important moral decisions in their life. Along with these four working principles there are also six fundamental principles that Joseph Fletcher teaches that guide people who follow situation ethics when making moral decisions in their lives. He believed that love was the only thing that is intrinsically good meaning that the criteria by which actions can be judged rest solely on this principle showing that all decisions must only be made out of love and that any action can be judges as good if they are helping human beings and bad if they do not. He believed that the ruling norm of christian decision is love showing that situation ethics is universal as you can also use situation ethics for decision making even if you are a Christian. He also taught that love and justice are the same, for justice is love distributed and believed that justice

is simply love in action and love at work in the community. His

Sorry, but full essay samples are available only for registered users

Choose a Membership Plan
forth principle was that love wills the neighbour’s good, showing that we must love our neighbour regardless of who they are or whether we like them or not which relates to the Christian teaching to ‘Love your neighbour as you love yourself’ again showing that it is a teaching that Christians can follow when making moral decisions. Fletcher’s fifth principle teaches that the end justifies the means highlighting the fact that is a teleological approach to decision making as it is only looking at the outcome, the most loving outcome. This shows that since love is the end in all cases, any action carried out in the name of love can be judged as good moral decision making.

The last fundamental principle that Fletcher teaches is that love’s decisions are made situtationally, not prescriptively highlighting the fact that Fletcher does not agree with rules and teaching people that each situation is completely different each time and can be totally different to different people, and that it must be looked at in its own individual way and a decision should be made based on their situtation not what the rules tell them to do or what others think they should do . All of these principles that Fletcher teaches help to guide people in the best, most loving way to come to a moral decision.

All of these principles highlight Fletchers main belief that the individual should be of paramount concern and that each ethical situation should be judged in its own context while still preserving the Christian principle of love. He therefore proposed an agapeistic calculus underling the duty to do what is the most loving thing in every situation. It is important to understand that Fletcher does not propose this a rule or law as the calculus does not say what a person should do in a given situation but instead provides a framework in which the person can decide what is the best and most loving outcome they can decide.it is just a principle you should try to follow and apply, not a strict rule that you must.

A person following situation ethics would take each situation as it came and would deal with each situation differently coming to a judgement as to the best way to respond by assessing the most loving and compassionate option. Fletcher rejected any sense of moral absolutes unlike Natural Law and agreed with the criticisms of casuistry as he believed that each situation is different , with different circumstances and that any attempt to apply a general rule to a specific situation will completely overrule and overlook the interests of the people involved and doesn’t take their needs into consideration.

He believed that situation ethics took the most compassionate and human approach to decision making overlooking strict rules and proceeds with the interests and needs of the individual at hand. So all in all I believe that the main idea and principle that Fletcher tries to highlight and teach through situation ethics is the principle of love, that anyone following situation ethics should base their moral decision making on what is the most loving and compassionate outcome in each situation.

We can write a custom essay on

Explain the Approach of Situation Ethics to Moral ...
According to Your Specific Requirements.

Order an essay

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

Risk Analysis and Decision Making

Q1: Part A Risk administration is the method of recognising and proactively answering to project risks. Generally (but not always) you will gaze for modes to eradicate dangers or to minimize the influence of a risk if it occurs. A risk contingency budget can be established to arrange in accelerate for the likelihood that some dangers will not be organised successfully. The risk contingency budget will comprise capital that can be tapped in order that your project doesn't proceed over budget. Part B: We will require two figures for each risk: P--probability that the risk will occur. I--the influence to the project if the risk occurs. (This can be broken down farther into the cost influence and the agenda influence, but let's just address a cost contingency budget for now.) If you use this method for all of your dangers, you can inquire for a risk contingency budget to cover...

Deriving Consensus Rankings Via Multicriteria Decision Making...

Purpose – This paper takes a cautionary stance to the impact of marketing mix on customer satisfaction, via a case study deriving consensus rankings for benchmarking on selected retail stores in Malaysia. Design/methodology/approach – ELECTRE I model is used in deriving consensus rankings via multicriteria decision making method for benchmarking base on the marketing mix model 4Ps. Descriptive analysis is used to analyze the best practice among the four marketing tactics. Findings – Outranking methods in consequence constitute a strong base on which to found the entire structure of the behavioral theory of benchmarking applied to development of marketing strategy. Research limitations/implications – This study has looked only at a limited part of the puzzle of how consumer satisfaction translates into behavioral outcomes. Practical implications – The study provides managers with guidance on how to generate rough outline of potential marketing activities that can be used to take advantage of...

The Application of Decision Making Theory

Learning objectives 1. Understand basic control processes in decision-making, and develop appropriate control systems to support specific strategies 2. Identify and evaluate appropriate performance measures to properly assess performance 3. Recognise the importance and the impact of effective information systems in supporting decisions concerning evaluation and control 4. Describe the determinants of decision success and understand the decision making matrix 2 Introduction Text based sources for the Notes: Wheelen and Hunger, Ch 11 (2010) Text Pages 367 - 393 In this module, we will focus on evaluating decisions. In doing so, we will reflect on the operational and strategic decision-making processes and, in relation to the latter, take a closer look at the ‘strategic gap’. We will examine the evaluation and control process within the decision-making process, with a particular focus on measures and steering controls. Finally, we examine what Harrison has labelled as the determinants of strategic decision-making success,...

Popular Essays


Emma Taylor


Hi there!
Would you like to get such a paper?
How about getting a customized one?