We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

Five moral dimensions of information systems Essay Sample

essay
  • Pages: 5
  • Word count: 1,276
  • Rewriting Possibility: 99% (excellent)
  • Category: ethics law

Get Full Essay

Get access to this section to get all help you need with your essay and educational issues.

Get Access

Introduction of TOPIC

1.Which of the five moral dimensions of information systems identified in this text is involved in this case?

There are five moral dimensions that come into play with information systems. They are information rights and obligations, property rights and obligations, accountability and control, system quality and quality of life. The moral dimension of that is involved in this case is accountability and control. Drivers must be held responsible for texting while driving as they are the ones participating in the at risk behavior. The driver makes the decision to text being aware of the dangers. The driver takes full control of the situation by texting and being distracted behind the wheel. The manufacturers and developers of the cell phones cannot be held accountable as they just provide the service that allows texting and discourage texting and driving.

2.What are the ethical, social, and political issues raised by this case?

The ethical issue that is raised by this case is that individuals are texting behind the wheel when they know is wrong. These individuals are not taking into account the safety and well-being of others that they might encounter on the roads. This behavior is considered unethical, as the drivers know that is wrong and still make the conscience decision to continue with this pattern of behavior. One can reach this decision by applying the number one step in the ethical analysis. This step talks about the facts that help define the ethical question. In this case it is clearly stated the dangers that texting while driving creates as being the same level as legally intoxicated, which makes the ethical question easier to determine by establishing that it harms others. The social issue that is raised is the value that people are putting on harming others versus sending a text message. This creates a conflict of a person’s higher values order. The texting drivers do not take into consideration other’s well-being and property as they are risking inflicting damage and injury to others. The political issue that is within this case is the severity of the punishment for texting drivers and the regulation that is administered. What is the proper punishment for a car accident due to someone texting? 15 years seems to extreme. The government can be violating your privacy because to prove you were texting would have to access your phone records, which are deemed personal.

3.Which of the ethical principles described in the text are useful for decision making about texting while driving?

One ethical principle that can be applied to texting while driving is if an action cannot be taken repeatedly, it is not right to take at all. This principle applies because one might text once while driving and no harm can occur but if one keeps texting while driving tragedy will soon

strike due to the distraction that it creates. The distraction could lead to a car accident, running

Sorry, but full essay samples are available only for registered users

Choose a Membership Plan
over of a pedestrian or driving off the road. The repeat action of texting while driving is dangerous and should not be done. In the case it mentions that neurologist have found that if drivers continue the texting behavior behind the wheel they can develop addictions to their mobile device. This addiction causes burst of adrenaline into the body, after the driver becomes accustomed to this adrenaline regular driving becomes boring and requires driver to multitask with their mobile device just to be entertained. This behavior possesses and even bigger problem as the drive cannot drive without use of the mobile device, which takes awareness away from the road. This furthermore addresses the principle that texting while driving cannot be a repeatable action.

1.Which of the five moral dimensions of information systems identified in this text is involved in this case?

There are five moral dimensions that come into play with information systems. They are information rights and obligations, property rights and obligations, accountability and control, system quality and quality of life. The moral dimension of that is involved in this case is accountability and control. Drivers must be held responsible for texting while driving as they are the ones participating in the at risk behavior. The driver makes the decision to text being aware of the dangers. The driver takes full control of the situation by texting and being distracted behind the wheel. The manufacturers and developers of the cell phones cannot be held accountable as they just provide the service that allows texting and discourage texting and driving.

2.What are the ethical, social, and political issues raised by this case?

The ethical issue that is raised by this case is that individuals are texting behind the wheel when they know is wrong. These individuals are not taking into account the safety and well-being of others that they might encounter on the roads. This behavior is considered unethical, as the drivers know that is wrong and still make the conscience decision to continue with this pattern of behavior. One can reach this decision by applying the number one step in the ethical analysis. This step talks about the facts that help define the ethical question. In this case it is clearly stated the dangers that texting while driving creates as being the same level as legally intoxicated, which makes the ethical question easier to determine by establishing that it harms others. The social issue that is raised is the value that people are putting on harming others versus sending a text message. This creates a conflict of a person’s higher values order. The texting drivers do not take into consideration other’s well-being and property as they are risking inflicting damage and injury to others. The political issue that is within this case is the severity of the punishment for texting drivers and the regulation that is administered. What is the proper punishment for a car accident due to someone texting? 15 years seems to extreme. The government can be violating your privacy because to prove you were texting would have to access your phone records, which are deemed personal.

3.Which of the ethical principles described in the text are useful for decision making about texting while driving?

One ethical principle that can be applied to texting while driving is if an action cannot be taken repeatedly, it is not right to take at all. This principle applies because one might text once while driving and no harm can occur but if one keeps texting while driving tragedy will soon strike due to the distraction that it creates. The distraction could lead to a car accident, running over of a pedestrian or driving off the road. The repeat action of texting while driving is dangerous and should not be done. In the case it mentions that neurologist have found that if drivers continue the texting behavior behind the wheel they can develop addictions to their mobile device. This addiction causes burst of adrenaline into the body, after the driver becomes accustomed to this adrenaline regular driving becomes boring and requires driver to multitask with their mobile device just to be entertained. This behavior possesses and even bigger problem as the drive cannot drive without use of the mobile device, which takes awareness away from the road. This furthermore addresses the principle that texting while driving cannot be a repeatable action.

We can write a custom essay on

Five moral dimensions of information systems Essay ...
According to Your Specific Requirements.

Order an essay

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

Business Ethics - International Trade Administration

As experts in business ethics, your expertise can be used to help breakdown a situation good or bad. In situations we can come in and erase the bad and replace with good or simple reinforce the good that is being done. In this case, we will be doing a lot of erasing for many reasons. This branch of the bank was not doing what it was supposed to in regards to protecting itself and following the country’s banking laws. “The actions cited included failing to put in effect measures to prevent money laundering, overcharging customers for financial derivative products and making loans that helped clients carry out a variety of improper deals, regulators said.” Acts like this are major unethical decisions that should never be made by employees of a bank. Such movements open up themselves as employees and the company to major back lash and trouble. All of that...

Ethical Issues in Business

Ethics is an area of study that deals with ideas about what is better and worse behavior. McDonald’s business is being governed by a clear code of ethics. Their staffs are committed and follow on its implementation. It is a promise to abide by the standards of business conduct. They promise to uphold integrity. Ethics is about our actions and decisions, Right vs. Wrong. The code of ethics of McDonald’s also pledges to resolve any private or public issues related to that of economic, political, social, financial and environmental problems (McDonald’s Corporation, 2006) Public ethics are what a person or a company claims or express publicly to others about its underlying values, intentions and motivations in a particular situation. Private ethics are the values, intentions and motivations of a person. Public and Private ethics may be the same, or they may be different. On the economic gains, McDonald’s has the...

Euthanasia: Ethics of euthanasia

The Ethics of Euthanasia Morality refers to the determination of right or wrong as upheld by a particular society or group of individuals. The contemporary moral issues related to the current problems that are of controversial nature and in which the community is evenly divided on the opinion they hold of right or wrong. Utilitarianism is one such concept in the field of normative ethics for the purposes of quantifying or justifying the moral standing of an issue within a community. Utilitarianism is a principle proposed by Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill in the 18th century leading to an early 19th century (Hinman 34). The law implies that an action is right if a majority of the people affected by it derive benefits from the work while an action is wrong if it will hurt more people. The pillars of measuring utilitarianism are intensity, duration, certainty or uncertainty, propinquity,...

Popular Essays

logo

Emma Taylor

online

Hi there!
Would you like to get such a paper?
How about getting a customized one?