We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

Hierarchy Courts of Subordinate Courts in Malaysia Essay Sample

essay
  • Pages: 3
  • Word count: 655
  • Rewriting Possibility: 99% (excellent)
  • Category: court Malaysia

Get Full Essay

Get access to this section to get all help you need with your essay and educational issues.

Get Access

Introduction of TOPIC

*“Subordinate Court” means any inferior court from the decisions of which by reason of any written law, there is a right of appeal to the High Court and includes any Court of a Magistrate of the Third Class established under the Subordinate Courts Ordinances of Sabah [Sabah Cap. 29] and Subordinate Courts Ordinance of Sarawak [Swk. Cap. 42]; and means, in relation to the High Court, any such Court as by any written law has jurisdiction within the local jurisdiction of that High Court. Subordinate courts consist of the Sessions Court, the Magistrate’s Court and Penghulu’s Court.

SESSIONS COURT
A Sessions Court has the jurisdiction to hear both criminal and civil cases. At present there are eighty seven Sessions Court judges throughout Malaysia. A Sessions Court judge is appointed by the Yang di-Pertuan Agong on the recommendation of the respective Chief Judges. Jurisdiction

Criminal
A Sessions Court has the jurisdiction to try all offences other than offences punishable with death. Except for the sentence of death, a Sessions Court may pass any sentence including natural life sentence. Civil

A Sessions Court has–
(a) unlimited jurisdiction to try all actions and suits of a civil nature in respect of motor vehicle accidents, landlord and tenant and distress; and (b) jurisdiction to try all other actions and suits of a civil nature where the subject matter does not exceed RM250,000.00.

yle="text-align: justify;">MAGISTRATES’ COURT The Magistrates’ Courts have jurisdiction to

Sorry, but full essay samples are available only for registered users

Choose a Membership Plan
hear both criminal and civil cases. At present there are one hundred and fifty one Magistrates throughout Malaysia. For the Federal Territory, magistrates are appointed by Yang di-Pertuan Agong on the recommendation of the Chief Judge. In each of the States, magistrates are appointed by the State Authority on the recommendation of the respective Chief Judges. Familiar to most urban people as it is established in all major towns and sometimes goes on circuit to regional areas. This court has the jurisdiction to hear civil cases and criminal cases. There are two types of classes of magistrate i.e. First Class and Second Class. Jurisdiction

First Class Court:
Criminal
A First Class Magistrate has jurisdiction to try all offences for which the maximum sentence does not exceed ten years imprisonment or with fine only and offences related to punishment for robbery and house breaking by night. Civil

A First Class Magistrate has the jurisdiction to hear all actions and suits of a civil nature where the amount in dispute or value of the subject matter does not exceed RM25,000.

Second Class Court:
Criminal
The Second Class Magistrate has the jurisdiction to try offences punishable with 12 months imprisonment or punishable with fine only as well as may pass sentence not exceeding 6 months imprisonment or fine not more than RM1000 or combination of the above. Civil

The Seconde Class Magistrate has the jurisdiction to try civil actions for the claim of a debt not exceeding RM3000. Performs minor function i.e. granting bail, mentioning cases.

PENGHULU’S COURT
Penghulu’s Courts are the lowest level of the Court Hierarchy in West Malaysia. The court of a penghulu presided by a Penghulu or Headman appointed by the state government for a mukim which is an administrative district. Jurisdiction

Criminal
Penghulu’s Court has the jurisdiction to try offences as stated in his Kuasa or offences punishable with fine only. The jurisdiction is limited to offences which can be punished with a fine not exceeding RM25 Civil

Penghulu’s Court has the jurisdiction to try cases involving a claim of debt not exceeding RM50 and the parties involved are Asian and understand Malay.

We can write a custom essay on

Hierarchy Courts of Subordinate Courts in Malaysia ...
According to Your Specific Requirements.

Order an essay

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

Economic Outlook for the Region

A prime mover is someone who has responsibilities or control over a business in order to execute a plan. Three pros that explains this in relation to CARICOM will be; 1. One of the benefits that CARICOM members got from this was being able to trade free within regions from the year 1974 when they initiated it. They removed all barriers to help this decision be actioned, this did not only improve revenue but it also improved the relationships with the members of states, which encouraged more trading of goods and services. 2. They improved the standard of living by creating better employment opportunities for their citizens. This also helped citizens of each member state to get the opportunity to leave their state to go to another to work, this was possible for them through the elimination of the work-permit system, definite entry for the six months period, the rights to...

The Supreme Court of the United States

One can observe that Mr. Dwight Dexter’s rights were not upheld in the case Dexter v. Michigan State Prosecutor.. His rights that were not upheld including rights in the Fourth, Fifth and Sixth Amendments, such as the right to a fair trial ,and the right to a search warrant. The following evidence will give fact of the matter that Dexter’s rights were not upheld throughout the steps of the criminal justice system. Sheriff Dodd’s actions violated the rights of Dexter. According to the notes from Sheriff Dodd, he had searched Dexter’s car without a search warrant. That is a violation of the Fourth Amendment, which gives security to unreasonable searches. The prosecution coached Randolph Stone and Morgan Livingston for the trial. Stone admitted in 1999 that he wasn’t supposed to say the fact that Dexter was on foot and without a weapon and he did not confess to any crime....

The Supreme Court and Constitution of the...

The Supreme Court, which is the judicial arm of the government, functions as the interpreter and arbitrator of the Constitution of the US. Essentially, the court rules, or adjudicates, on the previous rulings challenged for their constitutionality. Hence, the Supreme Court is the final court of appeal in the US from inferior federal courts or from state courts in case the constitutional issue is involved. Procedure from Trial to Supreme Court It is critical to understand beforehand that not every case can be heard by the Supreme Court of the US. So as to be heard, a case must involve issues of federal law or rather fall within the jurisdiction of the federal courts. Any case that involves singly an issue of parties within a state, or just state law will likely stay within the state court system and in this case, that state's Supreme Court would be the last...

Popular Essays

logo

Emma Taylor

online

Hi there!
Would you like to get such a paper?
How about getting a customized one?