History of Baptists Essay Sample
- Word count: 979
- Category: history
A limited time offer!
Get a custom sample essay written according to your requirements urgent 3h delivery guaranteedOrder Now
History of Baptists Essay Sample
The main thrust of Jason Duesing article, “The Believer’s Church: A ‘Natural Resource’ Worth Conserving” is that evangelicals must protect the doctrine of the church against impending dangers similar to what President Theodore Roosevelt did during the Industrial Revolution when shortages of natural resources were imminent. In fact, he illustrated that during the Industrial Revolution; America was expanding at a rate that was unprecedented and for many citizens of the United States of America and was indifferent over the limited amount of resources that were available to the country.
By being aware and anticipating such an imminent threat in the future, Theodore Roosevelt realized serious changes needed to be made. Similarly, Duesing compares the lack of concern that occurred in America during the Industrial Revolution to believer’s apathy of church doctrines that have been challenged by a secular world.
Duesing expressed his serious concerns against the apathetic believers by saying this, “Believers, acting under various constructs-from liberalism to ecumenism to even evangelicalism-have also engaged in ‘old wasteful methods’ with regard to the ‘natural resources’ of the doctrine of the church. ” Without question this sort of laziness among believers causes unrest and by failing to protect the doctrine of the church evangelicalism has become a “climate of ecclesiological relativism. ” As a result of believers’ apathy to protect the doctrine of the Church.
Duesing postulated several challenges have taken place in and around the church. First, because of believers’ lethargic and the unproductivity of the local church, he emphasized, “The testimonies of these churches are lost in their communities and the Gospel is often carried by individuals independent of the local churches rather than by the churches themselves [subsequently] scored of believers are more likely to have trusted Christ through and evangelistic rally or parachurch organization than through the preaching of the local church” (emphasis added).
Second, having not convinced that this new undefined method was the way the New Testament church was intended to become, Duesing declares that “The believer’s church [local church] is the resource the Bible gives for serving as a vehicle to protect and deliver the Gospel [message] to future generations. [Therefore] the people of God needed to take action to preserve and protect the doctrine of the church.
” While He believes that the Gospel is able to flourish in a culture of church relativism, if believers’ do not take action in protect or guard the doctrine of the church, “An undefined doctrine of the church leaves no guarantee that the next generation will have the same opportunity to say the same. ” Strengths and Weaknesses of the Article Having expounded on believers’ indifference regarding the doctrine of the church in the current climate of Ecclesiology, Duesing introduces the Anabaptists as the “Greatest champions of the believers’ church.
” Living in an ecclesiological environment that did not tolerate ecclesiological conservatism, the Anabaptists were persecuted for believing in ecclesiological absolutes. Though persecuted for their stand on doctrinal beliefs, Duesing emphasized that the Anabaptists, were, “The pioneers of ecclesiological conservationism in an age not of Ecclesiological indifference but of ecclesiological intolerance. Though there were some issues with Anabaptist beliefs, one of the strengths of Duesing’s article is the comparison of current evangelicalism in their lackadaisical view of church doctrine and contrast to the Anabaptist belief in doctrine.
While modern evangelicalism become apathetic of church doctrine in an era where freedom of religion is acceptable, Duesing stressed that even through persecution, the Anabaptists, “attempted to conserve the doctrine of [the] church in a climate far more hostile, yet they did [do] so not because they saw it as a Gospel essential, but because they realized that the believers’ church functioned as the vehicle to protect Gospel essentials.
Realized that the church must be a believers’ church and the union between church and state was harmful and unbiblical, the Anabaptists decided to completely separate from the Magisterial Reformers and establish a believers’ or local church. Duesing’s article provided a wealth of information regarding the current condition of the local church and the need to return to biblical approach of the New Testament message.
From a readers perspective the second strengths of Duesing’s article is his ability to address his audience by comparing and contrasting the story of the unconcerned citizen during the Industrial Revolution to believers’ that are disinterested concerning the church’s doctrine in modern evangelicalism. In addition, Duesing’s insightful narrative of the present state of evangelicalism has been an eye-opener.
Clearly from Duesing point of view the Gospel message has been weakened and made to be not offensive to those who walked contrary to it. In essence, the Gospel message has been made to please those who have refused to be transform by it and as a result the church has failed to remain strong in their convictions unlike the Anabaptists. They have failed to be radical like the Anabaptists who through widespread persecution remained faithful to the believers’ church and preserve and protect the doctrine of the church.
Having expressed his concerns to the indifference of modern believers; it was satisfying to know that he called out believers everywhere to see, “Ecclesiological Conversation as a Christian Duty. ” That is, believers’ must maintain a steadfast conviction on church doctrine, even if it is at the expense of paying the ultimate price. Conclusion Overall, Duesing’s article is noteworthy. It provides tremendous amounts of information to any believer regarding the state of the church in the twenty-first century.
Though some of his arguments and examples such as the Anabaptist could be challenge by those who are in disagreement with the belief system of the Anabaptist, Duesing is correct by asserting that the doctrine of the church must be preserved and protected by believers. This article is informative to the church and it should be read by any layperson, scholar, and seminary student as a way of starting a dialogue on the issue of church doctrine. This article was truly educational.