We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

How Far Do You Agree that Hitler was Primarily Responsible for Causing WWII? Essay Sample

  • Pages: 5
  • Word count: 1,275
  • Rewriting Possibility: 99% (excellent)
  • Category: hitler

Get Full Essay

Get access to this section to get all help you need with your essay and educational issues.

Get Access

Introduction of TOPIC

World War 2 was a global military conflict which involved all the great powers, as suggested in the title , the role of Hitler is debatable for its importance however to assess this one must observe the other intertwined causes .I , personally agree to a large extent that Hitler was primarily responsible for causing WW2. In my essay I have divided these causes into 3 large themes, the failure of collective security and enforcement of peace (with respect to the great powers), Economic weakness in Europe and finally the role of Hitler, his ideology and final miscalculation at Poland.

From the very end of World War 1, upon the severe Treaty of Versailles (TOV) there was huge resentment and humiliation which the German people faced , the treaty was generally regarded as to harsh, the great powers of France Britain and America slowly gave concessions to Germany, the young plan , dawes plan reduced reparations significantly , large American lending undermined their TOV, improving Germany’s condition greatly yet not removing the deep feelings of resentment .

A second point is the failure of the League of Nations (LON) in the 1930s during and after the great depression, as countries learnt to be self sufficient , their imperial designs increased . in the Manchurian and Abyssinian crisis , the LON was seen as weak , ineffective in protecting China and modern day Ethopia to Japan and Italy respectively. This increased ambitions of the leaders and gave confidence to them whislt greatly reducing the influence of the LON as a peacekeeper. Indeed the disarmament conference was a huge defeat for the LON as it failed to get all countries to disarm , which eventually resulted in the beginning of German rearmament. This was the first step backwards against all the good work the LON had done before and resulted in the adverse effect of increased suspicions and other countries rearming in anticipation of conflicts. , the failure of the United States and the Soviet Union to play an active role in peacekeeping in LON also hindered its effectiveness.

Thirdly , there was an inability of Britain and France to ensure international peace , they achieved a predominance out of proportion to their real strength this directly resulted in the Western adoption of the policy of appeasement , appeasement failed to be effective as it is only viable especially to a leader of Hitler’s ideologies from a position of strength , Britain and France although regarded as great powers even after the War were struggling with many domestic and international problems. Hitler fully exploited this foreign policy for example in the remilitarisation of the Rhineland which blatantly broke the TOV and the Locarno treaty. With lack of military strength among its many other problems, France had to ‘give in’ indeed in the

words of the French Historian Maurice Baumont, “A blow had been aimed not at France but at the

Sorry, but full essay samples are available only for registered users

Choose a Membership Plan
treaty of Versailles.” This policy allowed Hitler freedom to act first and then offer concessions and discuss after. He also took over Austria , then Czechoslovakia at the Munich agreement under the pretext of “Lebensraum” (living space) for Germans . Britain and France adopted this policy especially towards Germany also for the fact that it saw Germany as an enemy against Communism. Their increased appeasement to Germany resulted in increased tension and their failure to win support from the Soviet Union , whereas Hitler took full advantage and created the Nazi Soviet Pact.

Economically the European Powers were greatly weakened after WW2 and compounded by the Great Depression. This engendered a growing mood of resentment and disillusionment with the capitalist system in general and with the more powerful trading economies such resentment was expressed in ideas of self sufficiency or autarky.

This led to protectionist and isolationist policies which undermined collective action and cooperation. It stimulated the desire for empire building from the “have not” countries who resented the fact that Britain and France could fall back on their empire. Also the fear of Japan, Italy and Germany asserting their right to empires had the effect of sharpening conflicts over markets and raw materials, undermining economic cooperation and once again arousing dreams of imperial conquest. It is Important to note it was the political hostility generated from these protectionist policies in economic rivalry that encouraged more aggressive expansionist policies , such as the Manchurian and Abyssinian crisis.

The Great Depression resulted in much hardship for the people and allowed for the emergence of extremist ideologies such as Nazism which the people could believe and trust in.

The nature of the Nazi Ideology of deep difference with democracy and communism made international cooperation difficult, his emphasis on extreme Nationalism Darwinism, stressing that War was natural, his great public speaking skills convinced and prepared his people for War when others were afraid of the possible atrocities. Also the emphasis on the individual leader meant that there were no restraints on his ambition, no one to question his decisions.

Indeed Hitler did understand the feelings of the people and often played on the resentment of the TOV and promised a Great Germany and revival from the current terrible economic conditions. Upon his installation as the Fuhrer he was a great opportunist, his remilitarisation of the Ruhr as the French were between Governments, the idea of living space as a pretext to controlling Austria and most of Czechoslovakia. Hitler’s ideas were extreme, other leaders perhaps would have at most remilitarised the Ruhr as a sign of protest to the TOV before sitting on the increase in public support and opinion. Hitler however is known to have had a long term plan, even when he was in jail years before he became the Fuhrer his belief that a second World War was inevitable (suggested in his book Mein Kampf) was largely because of his own aggressive actions of rearmament and expansion.

It too was Hitler’s miscalculation of British and French actions with respect to Poland which was the immediate cause of WW2. Hitler thought the Munich Agreement hag given him the green light and thus over confidence set in. Simultaneously Britain and France realised that Appeasement had failed and in a favourable set of international and domestic conditions.

In conclusion, I agree that Hitler was primarily responsible for the cause of WW2 to a large extent as the other causes although important, are understandable or justified. America which had helped out greatly in WW1 had to respect its people’s feelings to stay out of European affairs and this caused the ineffectiveness of the LON as a peacekeeping organisation as it had little strength for the task. Economically, the route taken of Autarky and empire building was seen as necessary at the time and the Policy of Appeasement was virtually compulsory due to economic difficulties , lack of military strength and guilt of such a harsh peace treaty . However Hitler’s actions were fuelled by passion , unnecessary egotistical , Nationalistic actions , similar to his decision to exterminate millions of Jews , his international policies , decisions were uncalled for , indeed without his pressure on Poland , war would not have happened.


Anglo Chinese School Independent History notes on origins of WW2

Modern World History by Ben Walsh


We can write a custom essay on

How Far Do You Agree that Hitler was Primarily Res ...
According to Your Specific Requirements.

Order an essay

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

Most Important Element in Maintaining Hitler's Regime...

'We want to work on people until they have capitulated to us, until they grasp ideologically that what is happening in Germany ...'1. Weimar Germany, a place of squalor; painted red with bliss by the promise of idyllic fulfilment, the bedrock of which rested solely with consent of disenfranchised Germans, turned its face from democracy to autocracy. To a demagogue who embodied human ideals,2 promised fraternity for One-thousand years,3 but whose strings of power were kept taught by master puppeteers enticing the captive audience with mainly carrot; but also sticks. The insurmountable foundation upon which the 3rd Reich rested was the consent of the German populous. The extent to which the Nazi's believed they needed to persuade citizens to actively support the regime; is where the manoeuvrability occurs. For example, the terror state in the 3rd Reich acted as a gyroscope, in the unstable years of establishment, 1933-1934, and the...

The Main Reason Why Hitler Was Able...

After Hitler was made chancellor in 1933 and Fuhrer after Hindenburg's death, there were a number of factors that secured his status as Fuhrer with many legal and violent methods. His use of the Gestapo and the SS was certainly important to his ability to stay in power after 1933. This was not the only reason why he stayed in power, propaganda, his use of the state and party and social benefits all contributed to him staying as Fuhrer. Of course being leader, Hitler himself was a reason with his personal skills as the leader. Fear of the Gestapo and the SS was a important factor of this but their were certainly other reasons for Hitler's status to be secured. Fear of the Gestapo and the SS was a reason why Hitler stayed in power after 1933 as both organisations' techniques of spreading terror over Germany. This fear would have...

Was Hitler a Weak Dictator?

The Third Reich, for Hitler, was supposed to have lasted 1000 years minimum, but it only lasted 12 years and four months. Many historians blame this on an individual that's Hitler himself. The argument is based on Hitler being actually a weak dictator that wasn't able to unite Germany as a new Fuhrer should had, also he didn't create the basis of a strong empire but hurried everything up putting on risk everything he had accomplished. As Germany 1918 to 1945 states 'The inconsistency and contradiction in Nazi Government arose entirely from the Fuhrer's weaknesses'. When Hitler establishes his control over Germany in 1933, his power was by no means absolute as Stephen Lee states. For example he never had emergency powers from Hindenburg's, this still gave the Weimar Republic a chance to control him. However, Hitler used the Weimar State's own political element, democracy, to destroy it. He strengthened...

Popular Essays


Emma Taylor


Hi there!
Would you like to get such a paper?
How about getting a customized one?