We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

How Successful Is the Character of the Inspector in Portraying Priestley’s Message Essay Sample

essay
The whole doc is available only for registered users OPEN DOC

Get Full Essay

Get access to this section to get all help you need with your essay and educational issues.

Get Access

How Successful Is the Character of the Inspector in Portraying Priestley’s Message Essay Sample

The character of the inspector is successful in conveying Priestley’s moral message in which we are each to take into account of our responsibilities for our own actions and that we should also take responsibility for each other. The inspector gets this point across by creating sympathy and admiration for Eva Smith by the way he uses her to represent her social class and the way that he creates sympathy for that class in general. He also forces the Birlings to admit their guilt and responsibilities. In the play, the final words of the inspector indicate clearly Priestley’s message. The purpose of this speech is to leave the Birlings with an overwhelming feeling of guilt, so they realise what they have done and learn from their mistakes before another tragedy like this occurs again. He says that everybody is “responsible for each other” and that the “millions and millions and millions of Eva Smiths and John Smiths” all count as people. This is Priestley’s social message to the audience and to the Birlings. The Inspector tells the Birlings that if man will not learn this lesson “then they will be taught in fire, blood and anguish” By contrast, Mr Birling makes a speech, just before the inspector arrives, at the beginning of the play that totally contradicts that of Inspector Goole’s near the end, showing two very different philosophies of life.

Arthur Birling believes that a man has to “mind his own business” and he was only to look after himself, his family and no one else “community and all that nonsense” There is a lot of sympathy created for the working class in the play. Sheila and Eric do not agree with the pay the working class receive and the way they are treated. When Birling refused them a pay rise, he told them “It’s a free country” Eric replies and says “It isn’t if you can’t go and work somewhere else” This shows that Eric is more in touch with the different tiers in society, than Mr. Birling, who is old-fashioned and set in his ways. This also gives the audience a clearer picture of how hard it was to get a job, which creates sympathy among them. The Inspector tells Gerald and Birling than it is “better to ask for the world than to take it” which shows that the Inspector believes that Eva and her group were right to ask for a pay rise and should not have been punished for it.

Sympathy is also created when the Inspector suggests “putting ourselves in the place of these young women” because the audience immediately picture hungry, starving girls in their “dingy little back bedrooms”, “counting their pennies” and they couldn’t imagine having to live their life. Again Sheila and Eric realise that businesses abuse the working class “but these girls aren’t cheap labour, they’re people” Inspector Goole leads Sheila and Eric into saying such things. He ‘spoon-feeds’ them so he receives the response he wants, so he can build up a force against Birling. This creates sympathy, as Birling was the one that was ‘abusing’ the working class in the first place so the audience realise that everybody is ganging up on him. All through the little speeches made by the inspector about the working class, Mr. Birling is very quiet and is obviously taking it all in, and maybe secretly taking note in order to mend his ways.

The audience will se Birling on stage, very quiet, and again will sympathise with the working class as they see him thinking about it and considering, possibly, how low their quality of life was. Another tactic Priestley employs to convey his message through the inspector is the way he convinces Mrs Birling and Sheila to answer his questions. Sheila is very ready with her answers, lets everything spill out naturally, and in fact delivers a long speech about her visit to Milwards and she even goes to the trouble of trying to remember name of her assistant “Miss Francis”. Sheila is very honest about the way she behaved “I was very rude to both of them” and is clearly very sorry for what she did “I’ll never, never do it again”. The inspector wasn’t too harsh with Sheila, he wasn’t as nasty with her as he was with the rest of the characters, probably because he knew that Sheila was regretting what she did, and was truly sorry for her actions. Mrs Birling, on the other hand was much more awkward in questioning “and what if I was?”

She would not give the inspector a straight answer to his questions and the inspector was getting quite angry “ The inspector is crueller to Mrs Birling than to any other character. Sheila says he is “giving us the rope so that we will hang ourselves” This is exactly what he is doing with Mrs Birling, allowing her to dig herself deeper and deeper into the ground, without her realising until irreparable damage had been done. “So, who’s the chief culprit then?” Mrs Birling starts to blame Eric… “I blame the young man who was the father” Then she says that this young man should be “made an example of” she is now adamant that it was this boys fault and “ought to be dealt with very severely” Then the inspector breaks the news to Mrs Birling, not in a kind way at all.

We know what to do don’t we? Mrs Birling has just told us.”This illustrates the message again, Sheila, who was very co-operative, got off rather lightly, but Mrs Birling, who was not in the least co-operative and seemed none the wiser at the end of the interrogation, had a cruel trick played on her, and she was taught her lesson in “fire and anguish” I think that J.B.Priestley has used Inspector Goole to great effect in this play. He has allowed the inspector to convey his message about concern for people in the community. The play has made me realise that every decision I make, will affect somebody else’s life, so I must make sure it is the right one.

We can write a custom essay

According to Your Specific Requirements

Order an essay

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

Paul Marshall Commentary

McEwan uses Paul Marshall's character to convey his implicit social class through the use of literary devices. McEwan exploits sentence structure to portray Paul Marshall's lack of accomplishment in his life, as he is able to illustrate all his success in a short rehearsed speech. Furthermore the elongated sentence also highlights his insecurities, as it portrays that Paul Marshall has rehearsed his speech thoroughly and...

The image of the narrator character in...

The novel "Eugene Onegin" is the result of creative maturity of Pushkin, and it is the richest content and its most popular product. The text reveals to the reader a broad picture of Russian reality since the beginning of the XIX century, populated by full-blooded human characters.Among them stands a particular presence - a story. Along with the main characters stand out and his personality,...

Fasting Feasting Extract Close Analysis

In the ending of chapter twenty six, Mrs. Patton decides to request Arun to join her and Melanie 'to spend the day down at the swimming hole'. The swimming hole is used by Desai to illustrate America and nature. It is compared to the 'scummy green swimming pool' which represents India. This can be seen as India being a lot smaller in size to America...

Joe-Bob - Creative Writing

Joe-Bob sat despondently in Mr. Martin's Barbershop at the corner of Kentucky Street, waited to be served. The barbershop was empty because he was early. He was early because he had taken the day off work to get some hair to cover the oval and round shape, black mole that has grown on his forehead. Joe-Bob was a short, stout, sedentary and bald person, who...

How is Shylock presented in Act IV...

Shylock is a very complex and confusing character and we see many different facets of him throughout this scene. He could be seen as a villain that is made by Shakespeare to be hated by the audience so that his downfall later in the play can be jeered at. On the other hand, he could be portrayed as a character that is much deeper than...

Get Access To The Full Essay
icon
300+
Materials Daily
icon
100,000+ Subjects
2000+ Topics
icon
Free Plagiarism
Checker
icon
All Materials
are Cataloged Well

Sorry, but copying text is forbidden on this website. If you need this or any other sample, we can send it to you via email.

By clicking "SEND", you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy. We'll occasionally send you account related and promo emails.

Your Answer Is Very Helpful For Us
Thank You A Lot!

logo

Emma Taylor

online

Hi there!
Would you like to get such a paper?
How about getting a customized one?