How Would Feminist Scholars Conceptualize Family Violence? Essay Sample
- Pages: 3
- Word count: 819
- Rewriting Possibility: 99% (excellent)
- Category: feminism
Get Full Essay
Get access to this section to get all help you need with your essay and educational issues.Try it free!
Family or domestic violence has not been studied as a different science even before about 20 years ago. The reason why a lot of scholars (especially, feminist scholars) are interested in these studies now is a huge amount of violent sexual actions in family, beating of wives and other actions which happen within marital couple and sexual partners. Usually, the reason of family violence can be found in the childhood
can be found in the childhood of offender as really often the abused child or persons or witnesses of family violation become abusers. Plass and Hotalling in their work write: “The transmission process clarifies that parents who were victims in their families of orientation become perpetrators in their families of procreation. There is also some evidence of the intergenerational transmission of victimization, in which victimized parents do not themselves become the perpetrators, but their children seen as vulnerable for victimization themselves” (335). Actually, a history of violence in the family of origin is one of the most widely accepted markers for the occurrence of partner violence.
The partners will not report the violence facts actual in their family, so it is useless to try to find some real statistics. Some forms of family violence relate both across generations and within generations. Additionally, witnessing a family violence is significantly associated with adult marital assaults. Studies, which were based on clinical populations, usually battered women in shelters, support the data of the national survey and report high volume of cross-generational violence in 42% to 81% of the families of male batterers (Bowker, 215). The other kind of family violence is intimate partner violence (IPV), which is a serious problem that lies deep in the social fabric of our society and has no right to be forgotten. IPV has been a subject that has mostly been addressed by women. However, some men are now joining the effort to help end IPV. Intimate partner violence must no longer be viewed as a problem only affecting women but children also – increasingly, spouse abuse is a problem devastating every sector of society, overwhelming our courts and hospitals, spilling over into our streets, and filling our morgues.
Women’s experiences have been missed historically and feminist have said that women’s experiences are being tagged on to men’s. Now the feminist analysis of child and women sexual abuse is missing children’s experiences, they are tagging children’s experiences on to women’s. For example sexual violence against women includes child sexual abuse. Finally, Feminism sees the social construction of male sexuality as problematic but the problem is how some male sexuality is socially constructed because not all men are rapists or sexually abuse. While feminist analysis of sexual abuse does have some limitations we have to acknowledge that it does have many strengths. Feminism has brought us closer to understanding child sexual abuse better than any other theory that I’ve read on the subject.
As a conclusion it could be said it is not really easy to find the reasons of family violence and sexual abusing. We need to find out the reasons from childhood and social issues to be sure why exactly the family violence takes a place. We also need to compare men who abuse and men who don’t abuse and see what are the differences are. Maybe then we can get an even better understanding of family violence and sexual abuse.
Armstrong, Louise. Rocking The Cradle Of Sexual Politics. Addison – Wesley Publishing
Bandura, A., Ross, D., & Ross, S. A. “Transmission of aggression through imitation of
aggressive models”. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology. 1961. 575-582.
Dominelli, Lena. “Betrayal of Trust: A Feminist Analysis of Power Relationships in Incest
Abuse and its Relevance for Social Work Practice”. British Journal of Social Work. 19. 1989, 291-307.
Kelly, Liz. “What’s in a Name?: Defining Child Sexual Abuse”. Feminist Review. 28. 1988,
Lisak, D., Hopper, J., & Song, P. “Factors in the cycle of violence: Gender rigidity and
emotional constriction.” Journal of Traumatic Stress, 9. 1996. 721-743
MacLeod, Mary and Ester Saraga. “Challenging the Orthodoxy: Towards a Feminist Theory
and Practise”. Feminist Review 28. 1988, 16-55.
Plass, Peggy & Hotalling, Gerald. “The intergenerational transmission of running away:
childhood experiences of the parents of runaways”. Journal of Youth and Adolescence. 1995. 335.
Sorry, but A and B essays are only available for premium usersChoose a Membership Plan