We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

Interpretation of Hamlet’s Soliloquy Essay Sample

  • Pages: 3
  • Word count: 646
  • Rewriting Possibility: 99% (excellent)
  • Category: death

Get Full Essay

Get access to this section to get all help you need with your essay and educational issues.

Get Access

Introduction of TOPIC

In literature, two crucial factors for success are universal validity and a message that is close to many people’s thoughts about a certain subject. Probably being the most famous monologue of all time, Hamlet’s soliloquy has a universal message to which many people can relate. The main themes in Hamlet’s soliloquy are dominated by dualities – amongst others life vs. death, strong vs. weak, sane vs. insane.

Throughout the soliloquy, Hamlet treats life as a subject. As mentioned above, duality is a general theme that applies to every aspect of Hamlet’s discussion with himself. Already from the first line, the duality is present – “To be, or not to be, that is the question” (page 158, line 56). Not only is the duality mentioned in this opening line, but also the reader is introduced to the verb “be” as a symbol of life itself. This being said, the soliloquy can be interpreted as a discussion on whether to commit suicide or not. Hamlet considers the different advantages and disadvantages of each choice. Most readers would have the opinion that suicide is a display of weakness and even a way to “chicken out” on life, but Hamlet’s opinion is the opposite. The rhetorical question “Whether ‘tis nobler in the mind to suffer / […] / Or to take arms against a sea of troubles / And by opposing end them.” (page 158, lin

es 57, 59-60) is a central point in the soliloquy. Hamlet talks about life as a very bad thing. Life

Sorry, but full essay samples are available only for registered users

Choose a Membership Plan
is a long struggle that one can choose to endure, but that would be weak in Hamlet’s opinion. The opposite of this would be to be strong and end the life that one would have to endure.

The answer to “to be or not to be” is not that clear though. The quotation “To die, to sleep – / No more; and by a sleep to say we end / The heart-ache / […] / To die, to sleep – / To sleep, perchance to dream. Ay, there’s the rub, / For in that sleep of death what dreams may come.” (page 158, lines 60-62, 64-66) Hamlet’s fear of committing suicide is clearly depicted. Although it is explained somewhat clearly, that death would be a rational way of ending the evil life, Hamlet is now in doubt. As he compares death to sleep, he involves the mystics of what happens when the mind is not Deathconscious. He seems fearful of what happens when he will possibly be death, and that leads him to conclude that after all, he would rather deal with known problems than unknown. “But that the dread of something after death, / The underdiscovered country from whose bourn / No traveler returns, puzzles the will, / And makes us rather bear those ills we have / Than fly to others that we know not of?” (page 159 lines 78-82) supports, that mystic of afterlife is too much for him. He has made his mind up about suicide, and it is clear for all readers, that he will stay alive and deal with those problems that he know, rather than be surprised by problems that are possibly worse than the current ones.

If one has suicidal thoughts, one will most often have a tendency to have a distorted view on human emotions and how to express these, and this happens for Hamlet as well. It is depicted, that a strong person is in fact one who commits suicide and the opposite for a weak one. The fact that Hamlet concludes that he should not commit suicide and thus be strong is also the message in the soliloquy: No matter how distorted your emotions are, life is still life and a strong person would always choose life.

We can write a custom essay on

Interpretation of Hamlet’s Soliloquy Essay S ...
According to Your Specific Requirements.

Order an essay

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

The death of Romeo and Juliet

Discuss three characters who are responsible for Romeo and Juliet's deaths Romeo and Juliet is a young couples play about love and hate . The continual feud between the Montague and Capulet families result in a ongoing conflict and end with the death of Romeo and Juliet . William Shakespeare closely tangles the play so every character and event plays an important role in the tragedy of Romeo and Juliet. Is love really that worth "for never was a story more woe than Romeo and Juliet " and who really is responsible for the death of Romeo and Juliet . Lord and lady Capulet along with Friar Lawrence and Tybalt are responsible for the death of the lovers To begin lord and lady Capulet are responsible for Romeo and Juliet's death because they are unsupportive ,uptight and uncaring the Capulet's want to disown Juliet when she made the decision of...

How is the Theme of Death Portrayed...

Death is presented to the audience as a form of punishment, in both The Outsider and Antigone. But the protagonists in the two texts develop different attitudes towards death. Antigone anticipates her own death from the opening scene and faces it bravely, but her confidence wanes after she is sentenced by Creon and she begins to appreciate what she will lose. Meursault, on the other hand, is surprised and horrified when the court decides his punishment, but towards his conclusion of the story he accepts it. In the opening scene of Antigone, Antigone announces to the audience and her sister Ismene, her determination to bury her brother: "Be as you will; but I will bury him"1. According to Creon's laws, this is a crime to be punished by death, whereas for Antigone, the consequences of not burying her brother are worse than dying. Antigone shows clear awareness of the consequences...

"Death is Nothing to Us" - How...

Epicureanism is one of the philosophical schools of thought that was very popular during the Hellenistic period and was originally founded by Epicurus who lived from 341-270 BC. Epicurus continuously rejected the belief that gods interfered in human life and/or caused natural events to occur. One of his arguments was that if they don’t interfere in human life, they don’t interfere in human death. If they have no interference in human affairs why should humans fear their interference later, and if they are not concerned with human affairs why should humans be concerned with them? He denied and dismissed Greek religion as mere mythology. He believes that if the gods were divine and immortal they have no need, no time, and no interest to interfere in human life, because they are outside it and live in another realm. “They dwell in no world but in the spaces which separate one...

Popular Essays


Emma Taylor


Hi there!
Would you like to get such a paper?
How about getting a customized one?