We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

Keystone XL Pipeline Essay Sample

essay
  • Pages: 6
  • Word count: 1,501
  • Rewriting Possibility: 99% (excellent)
  • Category: environmentalism oil

Get Full Essay

Get access to this section to get all help you need with your essay and educational issues.

Get Access

Introduction of TOPIC

The Keystone XL pipeline project is a project that aims to reduce the American dependence on oil from Venezuela and the Middle East by forty percent. The construction of this pipeline is vital to the security and economic growth of the United States. The pipeline project is aiming to be a 1,179 mile, 36-inch-diameter crude oil pipeline. This project is a combined effort of the Canadian and American governments. The pipeline is proposed to run from Hardisty, Alberta, Canada to Steele City, Nebraska, USA. In addition to the transportation of crude oil from Canada, the Keystone XL pipeline project is projected to support an increase in crude oil production in the Bakken region of Montana and North Dakota. Lastly, this pipeline will allow more Canadian and American oil producers more access to large markets located in the American Midwest and Gulf Coast (“About the Project”).

There will be many benefits, both negative and positive, of this project. Many environmental workers could be affected including farmers, landowners, environmental groups, political interest groups, and players in the energy sector. Some of these benefits could include more American ready jobs, environmental impacts, economic impacts, and ecological impacts. Much of the controversy over expanding this pipeline comes into play when we begin analyzing the concerns of these environmental workers affected. To begin looking at some of the effects of the Keystone XL pipeline project, it is important to address the concerns of those affected directly. One of the biggest groups of people who will be affected directly would be the farmers and land owners in which the pipeline will be constructed. The TransCanada environmentalist specialists like to ensure their commitment to the land owners. The commitment to landowners is as follows: “We will:

Be fair, honest and earn your trust.
Maintain open lines of communication and keep you informed.
Understand the unique issues and intricacies of your land.
Pay you fair value for the land rights required.
Ensure your property is returned to its pre-construction productivity level. Respect you, your community and the environment (A Landowner’s Guide).”

The next group of environmental workers that should be considered would be environmental groups. Environmental groups focus on the effects of different environmental projects on the environment and community surrounding the project. Many environmental concerns are address in the Keystone XL Pipeline including dirty tar sands oil, water and waste pollution, forest destruction, pipeline spills, and more (“Keystone XL Pipeline”). The final group of citizens who raise concerns towards the Keystone XL pipeline are the political interests groups and the players in the energy sector. These people focus on the economic concerns of the project. These are the people who like to analyze how this affects American jobs, labor, tax money, and income. TransCanada projected that there will be roughly around 20,000 jobs created by this pipeline. The state department reevaluated the amount of jobs and projected that there will be 42,000 jobs directly and indirectly from the pipeline.

Obama states, “the most realistic estimates are this might create maybe 2,000 jobs during the construction of the pipeline, which might take a year or two, and then after that we’re talking about somewhere between 50 and 100 jobs in an economy of 150 million working people (“What is Keystone”).” There have been many recent updates and improvements on the Keystone XL pipeline. In May 2012, TransCanada filed a new application for a Presidential

Permit with the U.S. Department of State. This is a requirement for building cross-border pipelines.

Sorry, but full essay samples are available only for registered users

Choose a Membership Plan
Also, in 2012, TransCanada decided to continue its efforts with the Gulf Coast Pipeline project. In January 2013, Governor Dave Heinman approved TransCanada’s projected route in Nebraska.

This route would decrease the disturbance of land, water resources, and special areas in the state. March 2013, the U.S. Department of State released a Draft Supplementary Environmental Impact Statement (Draft SEIS) on Keystone XL that reaffirmed that there will be no serious impacts to the resources along the projected project site. The projected in-service date for the Keystone XL Pipeline is about two years after the issuance of the Presidential Permit (About the Project).

Since 2015 has begun there have been a few advances and one huge disadvantage to the Keystone Pipeline project. January 9, 2015 the House of Representatives approved the H.R. 3, the Keystone XL Pipeline Act, written by Representative Kevin Cramer (R-ND), which authorizes construction of the project. Then January 29, 2015, Senate approved S.1, the Keystone XL Pipeline Approval Act. Finally on February 11, 2015 the House approved S.1, the Keystone XL Pipeline Approval Act, which sends the bill approving the pipeline to the president’s desk. After careful consideration, on February 24, 2015, President Obama vetoes S.1, the Keystone Approval Act (Keystone XL: #TimeToBuild). On March 4, 2015, the Senate defeated a Republican-led effort to override President Obama’s decision to veto the legislation approving the Keystone XL Pipeline.

This project has been under review of President Obama’s administration for more than six years. The Senate had a close vote of 62-37, but did not achieve the required 67 votes to override President Obama’s decision to veto of the bill. Had the Senate been successful at overriding President Obama’s vote, TransCanada would have been able to begin construction of the pipeline. In a message to congress the week prior, President Obama quoted the U.S. State Department as his reasoning to veto the bill and stated that the legislation “conflicts with established executive branch procedures and cuts short thorough consideration of issues that could bear on our national interest—including our security, safety and environment.” In response, before the Senate vote, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R., Ky.) stated, “Construction of the Keystone pipeline would pump billions into our economy. It would support thousands of jobs. And a bipartisan majority in both the House and Senate voted to support it.”

Also before the vote, a democratic leader, Sen. Maria Cantwell (D., Wash.), who opposed overriding President Obama’s decision, stated that, “As we vote, the pipeline’s route through Nebraska is still in doubt. Even if the bill becomes law, the Keystone XL pipeline will not get built anytime soon (“Override of Obama’s”).” Many concerns can be addressed with the Keystone XL Pipeline project, and everyone will have their own views and opinions about the long term effects. The Keystone XL Pipeline project can have personal effects, environmental effects, and economical effects. The concerns of those people who are farmers and land owners should be the concerns that are addressed before the approval and construction of the pipeline because these are the people directly affected. Those of us who are indirectly affected should be more concerned about the environmental and economic effects of this project. This project is a great idea economically because it does bring new jobs and more revenue to America.

On the other hand the project has its downsides because the environmental effects of this project can be detrimental to our ecosystem. Observing and analyzing photos of the areas affected show that this will remove land that could be used for agriculture, it could cause more environmental pollution due to construction, and many more environmental effects. If I were Obama, I would have chosen to veto the bill until we could find out the long-term and short-term effects of the project as well as the personal, environmental, and economic effects of the project. This project is something that has had many revisions and could possibly have more to come. The short-term effects of this project are looking good for our economy but not for our environment, which plays a huge role in our existence.

If there are possible ways to revise and reroute the project then maybe then it can be reconsidered but the environment should be a strong factor in the decision of whether this bill should be passed again. The Keystone XL Pipeline Project will be a project of last impressions. It will have a great impact on the economic growth of America because it can offer many jobs as well as more revenue for the economy. Also, this project will allow decrease the dependence of America on Middle Eastern countries and Venezuela for oil. There are also many concerns that come with the project including the concerns of land owners, environmental groups, and political interest groups. This project can affect many people directly and indirectly.

Works Cited

“A Landowner’s Guide.” Keystone Projects. 2014. Print.
“About The Project: A proposed oil pipeline from Alberta to Nebraska” Keystone XL Pipeline. Web. 5 Feb. 2015. . “Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement Executive Summary.” Keystone XL Project. 2014. Print. “Keystone XL Pipeline.” Friends of the Earth. Web. 5 Feb. 2015. . “Keystone XL: #TimeToBuild.” Energy and Commerce Committee. Web. 5 Feb. 2015. . “Override of

We can write a custom essay on

Keystone XL Pipeline Essay Sample ...
According to Your Specific Requirements.

Order an essay

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

The Skeptical Environmentalist

ABSTRACT      This Book Review on “The Skeptical Environmentalist” points out the major facts argued by the author Bjorn Lomborg in the book which he titled “The Skeptical Environmentalist” with the subtitle “the real state of the world”. This book review is actually a kind of summary of the book. It highlights some of the arguments and claims made by the author. Effort was also made in this book review to point out some of the criticisms made to challenge the book.      The skeptical Environmentalist was foremost published in Danish in 1998. The Cambridge University Press in 2001 published the English Edition of it as a work in environmental economics. It is a controversial book authored by Bjorn Lomborg, a Danish environmentalist. The book disputes that analysis of the relevant data does not support the claims on definite phases of global warming, overpopulation, deforestation, declining energy resources, water shortage,...

Home Depot Stakeholder Orientation

The attributes of the stakeholder on the basis of Home Depot’s response to environmentalist issues can be measured in their power, legitimacy, and urgency. They possess power because they are willing to not shop at a company that is not environmentally responsible, so this put greater pressure on Home Depot to certified by the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) and continues to keep them “honest” as far as their environmental contributions and practices. The stakeholder has legitimacy because they want to make sure that Home Depot’s appearance of being environmentally responsible is not a sham, so they force them (power) to get certified and make sure they rank high comparatively on company’s environmental responsibility lists. They have urgency, because they wanted Home Depot to respond immediately to the growing need for large corporations to be economically responsible. As far as Home Depot’s strategy and performance with environmental and employee stakeholders, I...

Go-Green with Cloud Computing: Benefits to HR

Cloud Computing is the hot topic in today’s World. Cloud computing comes with the great advantage of providing higher energy savings, a fact which translates into being environmentally friendly. In the last few years, technology has improved immensely, taking the environment into account and providing a solution for those worrying about carbon footprints and the impact of technology into the environment. In the last couple of decades, HR has re-invented itself from the mundane activities like Industrial Relations, labour etc. to the front of a Company’s Business radar on par with Marketing, Finance, Administration and other departments. HR managers today use hundreds of strategic and collaborative technology tools to keep up the HR function fast moving. But lot of these technology tools is not implemented in a large number of Small & Medium Enterprises (SME) who forms 75% of our country’s market. Why? Because many of the SME’s are of...

Popular Essays

logo

Emma Taylor

online

Hi there!
Would you like to get such a paper?
How about getting a customized one?