We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

Law and Biddy’s Tea House Essay Sample

essay
  • Pages: 2
  • Word count: 356
  • Rewriting Possibility: 99% (excellent)
  • Category: negligence

Get Full Essay

Get access to this section to get all help you need with your essay and educational issues.

Get Access

Introduction of TOPIC

In May 2009 Natalie Attired started working at Biddy’s Tea House. Miss Attired had been evaluated four different times about her performance on the job. Each evaluation Miss. Attired had improved.

In June 2010 Miss. Attired had gotten a full sleeve tattoo. Miss. Baker the owner of Biddy’s Tea House had informed Miss Attired if she did not remove the tattoo she would be fired. Miss Attired did not get her tattoo removed and she was terminated.

In July 2010 Miss. Attired filed and was denied unemployment compensation because she was terminated due to “misconduct”. Issue:
The issue is that Miss Attired’s refusal to remove her tattoo does this constitute as “misconduct” under the New Mexico Statute § 51-1-7. Rule of Law:

N.M. Stat. Ann. § 51-1-7 does not have a definition for misconduct so they adopted the definition for misconduct under Mitchell v. Lovington Good Samaritan Center. INC., 89 N.M. 575, 577, 555 P.2d 696, 698 (1976) “Misconduct is limited to conduct evincing such willful or wanton disregard of an employer’s interest as is found in deliberate violations or disregard of standards of behavior which the employer has the right to expect of his employee, or in carelessness or negligence of such degree or recurrence as to manifest equal culpability, wrongful intent or evil design or to show an intentional and substantial disregard of the employer’s interest or of the employees’ duties and obligations to his employer. On the other hand mere inefficiency, unsatisfactory conduct failure in good performance as the result of inability or incapacity, inadvertencies or ordinary negligence in isolated instance, or good faith errors in judgment or discretion are not to be deemed ‘misconduct’ within the meaning of the statute. Analysis:

According to the definition Miss Attired’s actions did not constitute as misconduct. She did not disregard her employer in anyway It’s very expensive to get a tattoo removed. Conclusion: Miss. Attired did no in anyway commit misconduct, and she should be able to receive her benefits.

We can write a custom essay on

Law and Biddy’s Tea House Essay Sample ...

According to Your Specific Requirements.

Order an essay

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

Tort Law Case

Intentional conduct – deliberately harming others. Negligent conduct – deliberately slandering others. Negligent acts or omissions – fail to do something that results in harming the other person. Eg careless driving. Negligent misstatements – wrong advice or information.  Negligence – failure to take reasonable care, by causing damage to other party. Duty of care – legal duty is essential. Case on pg 498. A is not feeling well. B gets drink for A. there is no privity of contract between the seller and the sick person. A drank it and drink was decomposed and she became very ill. Retailer says he did not make the drink, cannot sue him. A decided to sue the manufacturer in negligence and succeeds. This case is foundation of product liability. Neighbour principle stems from them.. eg if u r a highway, the other roads are your neighbours. Someone drowning in pool, do you owe...

Australian Law - Civil Law - Torts

Torts • Civil wrong other than a breach of contract • Causes personal injury, property damage or financial loss • Innocent party usually claims damages • Purpose - justice to be achieved by transferring kiss I'm the victim to wrongdoer • Principle - each citizen should take responsibility for consequences of his/her actions Types of civil wrongs (torts)? • Compensation is the chief remedy sought • Nuisance, defamation, negligence, trespass, liability for dangerous animals • Nuisance - something unauthorised that is obnoxious or injurious to community at large or to an individual, especially in relation to his/her ownership of property • Trespass - direct an unlawful interference with possession of person, property or land, regardless or intention of trespasser Tortes verses contract law • Tort law - special relationship other than a contract which forms the basis of civil claims (e.g. Patient/doctor, parent/child) • Contract law - legally binding agreement...

Legal, Political, Ethical Dimensions of Business

1. What court decided the case in the assignment? Court of Appeals of Ohio, First District, Hamilton County. 2. According to the case, what must a party establish to prevail on a motion for summary judgment? In order to prevail on a motion for summary judgment, a movant has the burden to demonstrate that no genuine issue of material fact remains to be litigated, that is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, and that it appears from the evidence, when viewed most strongly in favor of the nonmoving party, that reasonable minds can come to but one conclusion and that conclusion is adverse to the non-moving party. In this case, the movant would be the Nadel family. 3. Briefly state the facts of this case. The child, Christopher Nadel, was suffered second-degree burns on his right foot as a result of spilled hot coffee. The Nadel’s raised the...

Popular Essays

logo

Emma Taylor

online

Hi there!
Would you like to get such a paper?
How about getting a customized one?