We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

Lawful Search Essay Sample

essay
  • Pages: 2
  • Word count: 363
  • Rewriting Possibility: 99% (excellent)
  • Category: constitution

Get Full Essay

Get access to this section to get all help you need with your essay and educational issues.

Get Access

Introduction of TOPIC

The search of the vehicle was lawful because the officer had probable cause to search because of the strong odor of marijuana. The odor gives the officer reason to believe there are drugs in the vehicle. The statement made by Ross that there are drugs at his residence is admissible in court because he was simply asked if there were drugs at his residence, there was no coercion, although Miranda warnings were not given at the time of questioning, the officer asked prior to taking Ross into custody. The arrest of Ross and Rachel was a lawful arrest because of probable cause. The search of the house was lawful because Ross gave his consent to search his residence The search of phoebe was la

wful because the search was to ensure the safety of the officers performing the search. . Because of

Sorry, but full essay samples are available only for registered users

Choose a Membership Plan
searches incidental to an arrest exception, this gives the officers the right to search Phoebe. The search of the table was lawful because they were looking for drugs and during this search a handgun is discovered. The handgun is loaded and stolen. Phoebe’s statement is admissible because at the time she made the statement she was in custody and Miranda warnings should have been given at the time she was placed under arrest.

If Miranda warnings were not given yet, then her statement could be inadmissible. Phoebes arrest was lawful because she was in possession of illegal narcotics. The inventory search of phoebe was lawful because she was in custody and a search of her property is necessary when being booked. Phoebe’s admission of the heroin being hers is admissible. The marijuana in Ross’ apartment is admissible because he gave consent for the search. The seizure of the papers is not admissible because they were looking for drugs; they were not there to go through any papers. The amount of bail is reasonable because 2 million is an amount that drug traffickers can afford but it is an amount that they could put up and jump bail. The date of the trial does not fall under due process. The date is excessive.

We can write a custom essay on

Lawful Search Essay Sample ...
According to Your Specific Requirements.

Order an essay

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

Amendment of the United States Constitution

The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution states the rights to give citizens of America the right to bear arms. This amendment was adopted with the rest of the other amendments, in the Bill of Rights. With that being said, there are many people out there that takes that amendment literally, and feel as if they should be able to own and have any kind of gun that they wish. However, there are many types of guns that are specifically designed for our military, for some state local law enforcements, which are illegal for the average individual to own, for obvious reasons. There are certain circumstances and tests that you have to meet in order to purchasing a gun or owning one. There are safety laws that are put into place for many reasons, such as them ending up in the hands of a felon, children, or even mentally...

First Amendment of the US Constitution

According to president George Washington, “If freedom of speech is taken away, then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter. ” Free speech is one of the fundamental rights that should be expressed by every human being, but sometimes it has negative effects on other people. In “From Cross Burning to Funeral Protests, Hate Speech Enjoys Broad Protection,” supreme court correspondent Richard Wolf argues that free speech does not necessarily lead to violence, and the supreme court should continue to protect freedom of speech; however, Thane Rosenbaum in his article “Should Neo-Nazis Be Allowed Free Speech? Argues that free speech should not have First Amendment protection because it leads to emotional harm. Although Wolf makes a good point, Rosenbaum is more persuasive for his credibility with his knowledge of the law, for citing convincing facts and statistics, and successfully employing emotional appeals. A senior fellow...

The Supreme Court and Constitution of the...

The Supreme Court, which is the judicial arm of the government, functions as the interpreter and arbitrator of the Constitution of the US. Essentially, the court rules, or adjudicates, on the previous rulings challenged for their constitutionality. Hence, the Supreme Court is the final court of appeal in the US from inferior federal courts or from state courts in case the constitutional issue is involved. Procedure from Trial to Supreme Court It is critical to understand beforehand that not every case can be heard by the Supreme Court of the US. So as to be heard, a case must involve issues of federal law or rather fall within the jurisdiction of the federal courts. Any case that involves singly an issue of parties within a state, or just state law will likely stay within the state court system and in this case, that state's Supreme Court would be the last...

Popular Essays

logo

Emma Taylor

online

Hi there!
Would you like to get such a paper?
How about getting a customized one?