We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

Legal Research Paper for Wills Trusts and Estates Essay Sample

  • Pages: 5
  • Word count: 1,144
  • Rewriting Possibility: 99% (excellent)
  • Category: appeal

Get Full Essay

Get access to this section to get all help you need with your essay and educational issues.

Get Access

Introduction of TOPIC

Mark Down, who is 74 years old, made a will leaving all of his assets to his children. He also executed a power of attorney, giving his son, Slowe, permission to handle all of his financial assets. Slowe is now worried that Mark may need Medicaid assistance in the future and wants to remove his assets, from his name, and give them to his children. Under the current law, Mark will be ineligible for Medicaid for a period of 5 years after the gift transfer is made, so it’s in Marks best interest to get all of his assets transferred as soon as possible. Because Mark doesn’t want to deal with the financial matters himself, the issue is whether or not Slowe can transfer Marks assets under his power of attorney.

In the case, Matter of Ferrara, 7 N.Y.3d 244 (N.Y. 2006), George Ferrari made a will in June 1999, leaving all of his property to the Salvation Army. Later that year, as his health began to deteriorate, George called on his brother, John, and Johns son, Dominick, for assistance. George wanted the family members to have control of his property and distribute it however they wanted to. On January 25, 2000, George signed a durable general power of attorney, which appointed John and Dominick, as his attorneys-in-fact. In addition, he signed a typewritten provision allowing John and Dominick to make gifts without limitation in amount, to themselves. Three weeks later, George’s health deteriorated and he passed away. During that three week period, Dominick transferred about 820,000 of his uncles assets to himself.

Upon learning of George’s death, the Salvation Army filed a claim, with the Surrogates court, seeking a turnover of George’s assets. Finding that George had been competent and correctly completed the forms prior to his death, the salvation army’s case was dismissed. The Salvation Army, then appealed, and the appellate division also dismissed the case. When the case reached the state’s highest court, the New York State Court of Appeals disagreed with both the Surrogate court and Appellate division. The court stated that the statute of limitation could be waived, by adding additional language allowing unlimited gifting in the power of attorney form. Otherwise, the $10,000 gift limit, per person, per year must be followed. The court concluded that, in section 5-1502m of the general obligations law, all gifts made pursuant to a power of attorney must be in the best interests of the principal. Therefore, they found that the statute’s intent had not been followed by George’s relatives in this case, because nothing in section 5-1502m indicates tha

t the best interest requirement is waived when additional language increases the gift amount.

Sorry, but full essay samples are available only for registered users

Choose a Membership Plan
style="text-align: justify;">In another case, Matter of Mildred Keri 811 A.2d 942 (NJ App.Div.2002), a mentally incompetent person, Mildred’s son sought approval to engage in Medicaid planning, which included giving much of the proceeds of the sale of her house to her two sons. In 1996, Mildred executed a general power of attorney naming her son, Richard, as her attorney-in-fact. Although it authorized him to apply for Medicaid on her behalf, it did not state that he could make gifts to himself or anyone else. Richard’s plan was to sell Mildred’s home and put her in a nursing home. He planned to take $98,000 of the proceeds, as a gift to share equally between him and his brother, and leave Mildred $78,000 to pay for her nursing home care, during the ineligible period for Medicaid, which would result from the gift.

The judge granted the sale of her home and nursing home placement, but refused to authorize the Medicaid plan. The reason for that was because, the power of attorney form did not include additional language, allowing him to make such large gifts. The power of attorney form did not state anything about gifts at all. The court also stated that while competent, if the principal does not specify a Medicaid plan, then Medicaid planning is not allowed, unless the beneficiary is a needy spouse. Therefore, the court said that “when the incompetent has not indicated a preference for Medicaid planning while competent, we will not prematurely force enrollment on the public dole at the guardian’s request for the benefit of the incompetent’s self-sufficient children”.

Both of the above stated cases are different, but each one pertains to what Slowe wants to do with his fathers assets. The matter of Ferrara case is much different than what Slowe wants to do. In that case, Dominick transferred his uncles assets solely for his own benefit. Slowe is wanting to transfer his fathers assets to benefit his father, so he will be eligible for Medicaid one day. Slowe’s father also has a will, leaving all of his assets to his children, which clearly tells what he wants to do with his assets when he dies. In the Matter of Ferrara, it was not George’s intent to leave his assets to his family members. He stated, in his will, that he wanted all of his assets to go to the Salvation Army when he died.

In the matter of Mildred Keri, Mildred had a will leaving all of her assets to her two children when she died. This case is very similar to what Slowe wants to do with his fathers assets. In both cases, the parents both have wills leaving all of their assets to their children. The children are also seeking the gift transfers to benefit their parents, in both cases. However, in order for Richard to have made the gifts transfers, Mildred would have needed to include the additional language of unlimited gifting, in the power of attorney form, while she was still competent.

Therefore, while Slowe’s father is still competent, it would be in his best interests to edit the power of attorney form leaving Slowe as his attorney-in-fact. He should add additional language authorizing Slowe, to make gifts of unlimited amount, on his behalf. He should also include that he authorizes Slowe to make gifts in regard to planning for Medicaid, in order to minimize his assets. Although some states may allow the transfer of assets as gifts, under a general power of attorney, it is best to be on the safe side and include the additional language, to be sure there is not a question of what Slowe’s father wants and there is never a problem if Medicaid takes the issue to court. In conclusion, although, there will be a 5 year look back period of ineligibility for Medicaid, because of the gift transfers, it is in the best interest of Slowe’s father, to go ahead and authorize Slowe, to make the transfers, as soon as possible.

We can write a custom essay on

Legal Research Paper for Wills Trusts and Estates ...
According to Your Specific Requirements.

Order an essay

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

David Walker’s ''Appeal''

David Walker’s Appeal is a landmark work of American history which was written by an African American slave during the nineteenth century. David Walker’s Appeal arguably the most radical of all anti- slavery documents, caused a great stir when it was published in September of 1829 calling for slaves to revolt against their masters. The piece of work exposed white racism and gave inspiration to abolitionists in hopes that one day change would come. David Walker’s Appeal which consisted of four articles explored many factors which he believed contributed to the “wretchedness” of the blacks including slavery, religion, ignorance, and the colonizing plan. Throughout David Walker’s piece of work he makes many religious references showing that he is a strong and devout Christian who believes deeply in his faith. Walker emphasizes that the only true master is Lord Jesus Christ. He goes on to explain that we are all created...

Legal Methord Case Note

Beginning students often have difficulty identifying relationships between the parties involved in court cases. The following definitions may help: Plaintiffs sue defendants in civil suits in trial courts. The government (state or federal) prosecutes defendants in criminal cases in trial courts. The losing party in a criminal prosecution or a civil action may ask a higher (appellate) court to review the case on the ground that the trial court judge made a mistake. If the law gives the loser the right to a higher court review, his or her lawyers will appeal. If the loser does not have this right, his or her lawyers may ask the court for a writ of certiorari. Under this procedure, the appellate court is being asked to exercise its lawful discretion in granting the cases a hearing for review. For example, a defendant convicted in a federal district court has the right to appeal...

Jfk Steel Speech Analysis

Throughout his speech in which he condemned companies for raising steel prices, Kennedy repeatedly appeals to a sense of communal sacrifice and collective responsibility in order to rally his everyman audience around this ostensible cause for outrage. From the beginning, Kennedy, a millionaire Harvard graduate, includes himself in the aggrieved camp of everyday Americans by using the first person “we”. The list of sacrifices being made by the “185 million Americans” are thus shared by him as well. He is on their side, united with them. Yet in the very same breath in which he lumps himself in with the rest of the country, he takes another privileged group – the “tiny handful of steel executives” – and sets them apart, separate. Such us-versus-them distinction is a critical justification for the contempt and righteous indignation that Kennedy heaps on the steel companies. But his appeal does not rest solely on...

Popular Essays


Emma Taylor


Hi there!
Would you like to get such a paper?
How about getting a customized one?