We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

Lion Led by Donkeys Essay Sample

essay
  • Pages: 6
  • Word count: 1,499
  • Rewriting Possibility: 99% (excellent)
  • Category: soldiers

Get Full Essay

Get access to this section to get all help you need with your essay and educational issues.

Get Access

Introduction of TOPIC

Introduction

In my essay, I shall be interpret ting why so many people believe “Lions led by Donkeys” was just idiotic generals leading his own soldiers in to a cold blooded war, which led to thousands of deaths and even more distraught families. But in fact the generals could have done more good than the bad since we the British soldiers had successfully won the battle at the western front furthermore the Great War. Throughout my essay, I will argue each source that supports the Lions led by Donkeys and find out that if the statement or evidence explains that either the generals was confused as well as not knowing how to win the war or was it just a mere tactic.

Section A

In the first section, I will argue why so many people are positive that the Lions were led by Donkeys and how they was incapable of leading soldiers into War. I will argue using a variety of sources to show either they are reliable or unreliable.

In source (A4) it shows it’s from a newspaper article, the Times newspaper which was published in November 1914 thus meaning many people read the newspaper and that this article was published during the western front. The quote “day after day butchery of the unknown by the unseen” is very clear and direct explaining people are dieing endlessly day after day, it shows that war is scary and lots of lives are lost in addition to this less people will be joining the war but this source is surprising as it contradicts popular opinions of the time and also given some information on how to attack the Western front “Fresh troops brought up under cover of a tremendous artillery fire which opens by surprise may effect a breach. But only with a heavy loss can such an attack be carried through”. This source is quite reliable since the newspaper is trying to tell the truth to the readers but it could also be quite biased furthermore there is no picture to back up the evidence.

Source (D5ii) is part of a letter in reply to the article in the Daily Mail that was written on November 10th 1998 it describes many opinions made be during and after the war, the article show peoples opinions of the generals that were in charge at the western front, the people which were and weren’t affected by the war still negative thoughts even though the war is over and the British won, this shows that many people thought the war was a big mistake since they still debate and argue over something that was 89 years ago. I believe this source is quite reliable since the article was issued in The Daily Mail and again after the following years, this shows that the Western front war is important to people lives. This source important because people still read it and it has the opinions of many people but its also unreliably because its published in a newspaper as a result it could be biased towards the readers.

Source (C3) is from two soldiers called Fred Pearson and Private P. Smith who both fought on the Western front, the source shows the two soldiers personal opinions about the general(Haig) that was commanding at the Western fron

t. Although Fred Pearson is bitter, he and Private P. Smith both say the generals are lazy and never

Sorry, but full essay samples are available only for registered users

Choose a Membership Plan
took part physically during the war “He lived almost 50 kilometres behind the line and that’s about as near as he got” the source tells us that some generals never experienced the trenches. I believe this source is reliable to a certain point because both men were probably under command by General Haig at some point during war. However it could be argued both sources are bitter and it’s their interpretation, but it is possible that these men could hold a grudge against Haig because he never took part in war physically and also he received an Earl and 100,000 pounds. I believe this source is very reliable because it’s to opinions of men which had both been in the war and they didn’t like the conditions their general forced to fight in. This source supports the argument that the soldiers were “Lions led by Donkeys.

Finally source (c2) shows the official figures, issued in 1920 just after the war. The source shows that most soldiers during the war had died at the western front meaning that either the soldiers lagged or generals was not doing their job correctly; compared to the other fronts most men had died in the Western front. The source is very reliable because they are official figures in August 1914 – 30 November 1919.

Section B

Although many people argued that “Lions led by Donkeys” were in actual fact true but some believed it was an invalid interpretation and that the generals indeed tried their best throughout the war. I will be analysing each statement and source to see how they are reliable and unreliable as well as how they relate to “Lions led by Donkeys”.

Firstly in source (B1) it shows an official portrait of Sir Douglas Haig with a extract from his biography that appears in a modern history book, in the extract it says “married a lady-in-waiting to the queen” which tells us he has links with royalty furthermore he has served in the South African (1899-1903) and later in India, the information given makes more logic for him becoming a general; by the end of Western Front he was promoted to Field Marshal and was awarded �100,000 by parliament because of his strategies during the war. I believe this source is unreliable because it’s Haig’s own interpretation which could be biased.

Secondly source B2 is about a letter from King George V to Sir Douglas Haig talking about how well Haig did during the war and that he has the full support of his soldiers. Sir Douglas Haig had a connection with the royalty as shown in source (B1) “married a lady-in-waiting to the Queen” this could be argued that his connections with the king may have aided his career. This evidence is unreliable because it is a letter from the king which could have been forged but also it’s reliable since the letter wants to know everything that had happened in the war.

In source (A5ii) shows a statement written by a person who is a war hero but from Victoria Cross (1918) the source shows that the Captain in A.O Pollard had already won the battle at Victoria Cross and it was just a matter of time before the Western front battle finished. The source talks about how the battle was at a stalemate and it gives valid facts “The element of surprise was always missing” it shows that the Captain A.O Pollard didn’t have much faith in the battle because they kept missing but it also shows that the author believed in the battle. This source is reliable because it was written by a war hero which had a positive attitude towards the soldiers at the western front.

Source (B4ii) Haig gives his own opinion on how the battle went which were Germans have surrendering freely and the troops are full of confidence. Haig’s opinion was published the day after the battle which makes his opinion very reliable but also it is unreliable because his opinion which could be biased since on the first day Haig lost approximately 60,000 soldiers, which could make Haig’s statement a lie; to make him sound like a good general.

Finally source (D5i) was a newspaper article written by a military historian and was published in The Daily Mail; which is very popular and many people read. Military historian, John Keegan describes all the positive things to stop the readers and mainly families that have grudges towards the generals but instead they should be cherishing he generals since they had tactics which lead us the British army to victory. I believe that this source is very reliable because it speaks about all the truth that the generals had done but unreliable for the reason that there maybe biased towards the generals side.

In conclusion there cannot be a right answer because the question is based purely on opinion. I believe the Generals were not donkeys because Haig must have been good because we won the war. And at the time the tactics they used by keep on sending men didn’t work but no one new a different way.

We can write a custom essay on

Lion Led by Donkeys Essay Sample ...
According to Your Specific Requirements.

Order an essay

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

Attitudes of British Soldiers to Their Commanders...

Sources A, B and M are useful in telling you about the attitudes of British soldiers and their commanders; but source M varies the view that is in the others as it is an officers opinion when writing about a dead soldier. None of the sources I am evaluating have the date they were written on them, so there is a slight doubt about their usefulness to an historian. But I know that Siegfried Sassoon was a soldier in the British army and that he is also one of the most influential war poets. It is well known that all of his poetry was written either during the period that he was fighting in or in the mental hospital he was taken to after he had served. This enhances the usefulness of the source because it was written near to the time of the war and the writer also had...

Do You Agree With This Interpretation of...

Source A shows two pictures of Anzac soldiers. The pictures show the soldiers to be battered, not well organised, and not very motivated but always smiling. Above one of the pictures it has the title 'The Hopeless Dawn' this gives the impression of hopelessness and heroism, this is because even though there seems to hope in the soldiers winning the battle or even staying alive, they still keep going. The source suggests that it agrees with the interpretation of Anzac soldiers to be heroes. It shows them to be heroes because they're always smiling. An example of a hero of the Anzac troops was John Simpson Kirkpatrick. He was seen as the personification of the Anzac sprit. He was known as "man with donkey" he was a field ambulance stretcher-bearer and only the strongest men were chosen for this job. He was known as "man with donkey" because he used...

Children Soldiers: A Rationalist Perspective

Introduction From history it has been noted that many of the children’s are used in the armed forces. And there were many governments and many social schemes are prohibiting the use of children’s for fighting against any one. There are many nations and states that have used many powers and other ways to stop recruitment of children’s in the forces but this was all failed with all such efforts which were done in the past. The use of children’s in the forces is very high and it is very difficult to take the exact number of children’s who are playing any role in the forces of different countries. However in some research reports, analyst’s show the counting of children’s in this field is to be about 300,000. From past, there has been much increase in the recruitment of children’s in arm forces, which was viewed by the report made by...

Popular Essays

logo

Emma Taylor

online

Hi there!
Would you like to get such a paper?
How about getting a customized one?