We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

Maddox V. Montgomery Essay Sample

essay
  • Pages: 3
  • Word count: 715
  • Rewriting Possibility: 99% (excellent)
  • Category: appeal court

Get Full Essay

Get access to this section to get all help you need with your essay and educational issues.

Get Access

Introduction of TOPIC

Jimmy Maddox was sentenced to serve a life of imprisonment after he was convicted in a Georgia State court for charges of rape. Maddox filed for a federal Habeas corpus petition after being unsuccessful at a direct appeal for his charges. His reason behind filing the federal habeas corpus was for the court violating the doctrine of Brady v. Maryland for alleging prosecutorial suppression of exculpatory evidence. The Brady doctrine applies to this case in 4 areas;

“1) The prosecutor has not disclosed information despite a specific defense request; 2) the prosecutor has not disclosed information despite a general defense request for all exculpatory information or without any defense request at all; 3) the prosecutor knows or should know that the conviction is based on false evidence; 4) the prosecutor fails to disclose purely impeaching evidence not concerning a substantive issue, in the absence of a specific defense request,” (Ingram 2015, pg 781). United States V. Anderson required proof that the accused believed that some particular “official proceeding” was likely to occur in the near future, and was incorrectly instructed that an “official proceeding” includes an investigation. Issue:

Maddox declared that his rights to due process were violated as it is stated in the doctrine of Brady v. Maryland. This violation is proven by the state failing to disclose a photograph taken by the police of Elder’s bed neatly made shortly after the alleged rape. The police found no blood, semen, or fluids of other kinds on the bedspread during an examination, no r

ape kit was used either, and proof of a letter was found that Debbie Phillips had left the insurance

Sorry, but full essay samples are available only for registered users

Choose a Membership Plan
Maddox belonged to for financial reasons by way of a written statement from a witness by the name of Brenda Phelps. Maddox had appealed the denial of habeas relief.

Decision of the Court:
The United States Court of appeals ruled that the suppressed evidence is purely impeaching evidence and no defense request has been made, the suppressed evidence is material only if its introduction probably would have resulted in acquittal. Phillips’ testimony played a minor role in the case and Phelps statement had little impact on the jury’s evaluation of Phillips’ credibility. Because of these two things, Maddox was unable to demonstrate that the evidence could have resulted in an acquittal. Under the United States v. Blasco, the evidence was mute, meaning that the defendant filed a joint motion to suppress all physical evidence found and gathered by the officers and any statements made by the defendant. Maddox did not have to raise a fourth amendment challenge as the magistrate found that the requested suppression did not violate the due process right. Maddox’s habeas petition was dismissed by the district court for ongoing reasons, thus making this decision by the district court affirmed. Reasoning of the Court:

The Brady doctrine was determined to not apply by the United States Court of Appeals because the defense team for Maddox had not requested the information be disclosed. Maddox brought up his post conviction habeas corpus petition after he unsuccessfully pursued his direct appeal. The due process was proven to be violated through the omitting of evidence and the failure to disclose in the United States v. Agurs. The police examination of the bedspread produced results that did not give rise to reasonable doubt and are mute under Agurs. The appellant’s version of the incident is found to be consistent with the information and does not contradict the alleged victim’s testimony. The evidence in question for the case is not sufficiently material to render the state’s failure to disclose unconstitutional due to the substantial inculpatory evidence in the record. Rule of Law:

In order to gain victory on a Brady claim, you have to establish the materiality of the exculpatory information suppressed by the prosecution. United States v. Kopituk, The applicable threshold of materiality, however, varies depending on the type of situation. Dissent:

All the evidence cannot consider the respect most inclined to the government, but instead should evaluate all the evidence as it pertains to the deliberations of a fact finder.

We can write a custom essay on

Maddox V. Montgomery Essay Sample ...
According to Your Specific Requirements.

Order an essay

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

David Walker’s ''Appeal''

David Walker’s Appeal is a landmark work of American history which was written by an African American slave during the nineteenth century. David Walker’s Appeal arguably the most radical of all anti- slavery documents, caused a great stir when it was published in September of 1829 calling for slaves to revolt against their masters. The piece of work exposed white racism and gave inspiration to abolitionists in hopes that one day change would come. David Walker’s Appeal which consisted of four articles explored many factors which he believed contributed to the “wretchedness” of the blacks including slavery, religion, ignorance, and the colonizing plan. Throughout David Walker’s piece of work he makes many religious references showing that he is a strong and devout Christian who believes deeply in his faith. Walker emphasizes that the only true master is Lord Jesus Christ. He goes on to explain that we are all created...

Legal Methord Case Note

Beginning students often have difficulty identifying relationships between the parties involved in court cases. The following definitions may help: Plaintiffs sue defendants in civil suits in trial courts. The government (state or federal) prosecutes defendants in criminal cases in trial courts. The losing party in a criminal prosecution or a civil action may ask a higher (appellate) court to review the case on the ground that the trial court judge made a mistake. If the law gives the loser the right to a higher court review, his or her lawyers will appeal. If the loser does not have this right, his or her lawyers may ask the court for a writ of certiorari. Under this procedure, the appellate court is being asked to exercise its lawful discretion in granting the cases a hearing for review. For example, a defendant convicted in a federal district court has the right to appeal...

Jfk Steel Speech Analysis

Throughout his speech in which he condemned companies for raising steel prices, Kennedy repeatedly appeals to a sense of communal sacrifice and collective responsibility in order to rally his everyman audience around this ostensible cause for outrage. From the beginning, Kennedy, a millionaire Harvard graduate, includes himself in the aggrieved camp of everyday Americans by using the first person “we”. The list of sacrifices being made by the “185 million Americans” are thus shared by him as well. He is on their side, united with them. Yet in the very same breath in which he lumps himself in with the rest of the country, he takes another privileged group – the “tiny handful of steel executives” – and sets them apart, separate. Such us-versus-them distinction is a critical justification for the contempt and righteous indignation that Kennedy heaps on the steel companies. But his appeal does not rest solely on...

Popular Essays

logo

Emma Taylor

online

Hi there!
Would you like to get such a paper?
How about getting a customized one?