Marketing and Organizational Markets Essay Sample
- Pages: 8
- Word count: 2,147
- Rewriting Possibility: 99% (excellent)
- Category: market
Get Full Essay
Get access to this section to get all help you need with your essay and educational issues.Get Access
Introduction of TOPIC
It was 1985 when the marketing manager, Strong of Aldus Corporation, met with marketing and sales to discuss ways of moving forward with the company’s brands. Strong formulated an idea that Aldus should divide it’s products into two lines. Strong proposed that the company’s entire product line should be distributed under the category of each of the identified company products. The result of this was the Aldus Executive Series and Aldus Professional Series. Strong’s stance was that two major market segments were identified. Strong felt Aldus’ product should concentrate on the identified segments. Strong’s stance was that Aldus would make a distinction of the two positioning of each of the major products.
Before this, Aldus offered a single product that transcended the difference between the business and the professional market. Aldus’ management heavily questioned this strategy. Positioning is seen as a way a market niche is identified for a brand and strategies instituted to cement a brand in the minds of the consumers. According to Trout (1969), the mind of a consumer is a repository. All types of information enter the mind of the consumer including advertisements. Trout states that if a consumer lacks interest in an advertisement, it will be forgotten but they will remember the needed ones. Trout (2001, p. 19) explained that positioning is: “an organized system for finding a window in the mind. It is based on the idea that communication can only take place at the right time and under the right circumstances.” The art of positioning is to outwit industry competitors.
A summary of Moore (1991) is that strategies should be formulated to convince the customer that products and services of one company are better than the competition. In 1985, the process of publishing was so time and resource consuming that literally any advancements in assisting the publishing industry would be embraced. Strong saw that various users would benefit from Aldus’ products and services. Because of this, Strong felt Aldus should take a customer need type approach and go after market segmentations. Now I will discuss the difference between consumer and organizational markets. To summarize Reynold & Olsen (2001), the difference between consumer and organizational markets is a matter of degree; meaning that there are parallels but great differences. Consumers obtain goods and services for personal consumption. Organizational markets obtain goods to be resold or to produce for profit.
Consumer markets composed of individuals buying in small amounts. Organizational markets are often groups like wholesalers, government and manufacturers that buy bulk. Consumer market are known for its complex diversity of expectations and sheer consumer numbers. Organizational markets are more narrowed in numbers with similar expectations. Summarizing Philipp (2007), organizational products are often less complex, ready-to-use and requires very little expertise. Organizational markets produce to meet the demand of the consumer market. Organizational markets obtain raw materials for production to satisfy the need of the consumer market. Products in this market require some technical expertise.
Consumer markets tend to acquire goods based on personal preference, lifestyle, family influence, peer influence and self consumption trends. Organizational markets tend to involve more people in the organization as well as influence from competitors. Within Organizational Markets, raw materials involve much involvement to acquire at lower costs that affect the profit margin. Organizational markets often utilize a salesforce for one-to-one sales and direct sales. Organizational markets depend on and strive to be cost conscious and prefer longterm relationships with suppliers. Organizational markets usually employ a multichannel approach to tap into the consumer market. They will use direct internet sales, retail stores, factory outlets and licensure to third party distributors. I will now talk about how these differences augment the strategy of positioning.
The goal of positioning is to get a leg up on the the competition by cementing your brand in the minds of the consumer. In other words, if a consumer thinks “smartphone”, they think iPhone. Knowing the differences between the needs of the organizational market and consumer market and the goals of purchase by each will lead to strategic selling which ultimately satisfies the needs of the consumer. Also, knowing the make up and sheer complexity of each market will lead the organization to choose what different medias to deploy to make the end products available through the desired channels. It is imperative to know your consumer. An organization can use different positioning attacks if the make up of lifestyle choices, feelings, motivation, peer influence and consumer tastes are known. Knowing your consumer in short leads to more sales. What is the criteria for market segmentation? Strong’s stance was the market was split by what computer OS was used by the consumer. The split was the generic business consumer and professional graphic designer. Ultimately, this lead Strong to a four market segmentation which were the business users and graphic professionals using Mac (segment 1 and 2) and business users and graphic professionals using PC MS-DOS (s
egment 3 and 4). I will now discuss the segmentation plan of the
Let’s discuss the product life cycle stages. PageMaker was the primary product that built a wall in the market for Aldus. There were 4 stages that were identified stages of the PageMaker market. PageMaker has performed differently each of these identified four stages. The identified 4 stages are introduction, growth, maturity and decline. The characteristics of the introduction stage is characterized by the release to market and slow growth rate. Frequently, companies experience loss instead of profit during the introduction stage. Growth is slow at this stage because the product is newly introduced into the market. During the introduction stage, the goal is product awareness of the target market. The ultimate goal is to satisfy the need of the consumer.
The growth stage of the product life cycle acceptance by the consumer based on need satisfaction. This is often the stage in which a company starts to turn a profit bases on acceptance and performance. You will often see companies experiment with different strategic selling techniques to sustain the growth. Commonly, the growth stage is characterized by strong brand building with the goal of keeping a leg up on the competition. Much like real life, the maturity period is marked by period of plateau in growth. Often during the maturity stage, the competition between your established brand and the up and coming competition heats up and can become rather aggressive. This stage is often marked by increased marketing spending, aggressive advertising and decreased company profits. The handling of this stage often makes or breaks the long term stability of a company.
Decline is the stage in which the decay of a product is identified by low to no growth. This is often the end of life cycle for a product. Marketing dollars and profits markedly decrease at this stage. By this stage, the market may be flooded with similar products and heavily diluted by previous consumer purchases. In short, the market often sees a product as old and obsolete during the decline stage. I will discuss what stage of the product life cycle as described above applies to the pro version of PageMaker based on the company’s vision. I would conclude that this product is in growth stage. PageMaker has completed the introduction stage by cementing alliances with companies such as Apple. Aldus used public relation campaigns and a great number of 3rd party resellers to peak the interest of their target markets. Strong justifies the growth cycle conclusion in his market analysis.
Aldus felt that graphic professional were up and coming over the next 5 years which would expand the market for PageMaker. Aldus market analysis showed the desktop market was dynamic, competitive and had rapid change potential. This analysis coupled with the PageMaker industry name recognition puts PageMaker in the growth stage. I will discuss the marketing mix of the pro version of PageMaker. I feel the marketing mix for the pro version of PageMaker is product, price, promotion and place. First it is important to define what a product is. Product are often defined as something tangible or intangible that satisfies a consumer’s needs. Tangible products can be seen, touched and/or smelt. Intangible products are not actually physically there and are often left to customer emotional feelings. PageMaker
7 qualifies as both because you can’t physically touch computer code, but it is used to produce a tangible end product. Price means how much does a product cost in money value. Price points are how much is a consumer willing to spend on a product to make the product profitable to the company. Price point directly affects company profits, product adoption and product longevity. The meaning of promotion is what is the strategies and investments that a company is willing to make to sell a product. There are multiple channels in which a product can be promoted. Examples of channels are the direct marketing, 3rd party marketing, internet marketing and visual and/or digital marketing. The definition of place is where products and services are positioned and where the consumer has access to them. Placement is paramount in the success of a product and subsequently the success of a company.
A consumer will not use a product if they have to jump through hoops and go out of their way to obtain it. Good product placement drives company name recognition. Let’s discuss what perceived value is. In short, perceived value is how much is a consumer willing to spend on a product. You often hear the term, “Bang for your buck”. This means what does to consumer expect to gain by consuming your product and the personal value to the consumer leading to a benefit. So for example, if I am a graphic artist charging by the hour and I expect to charge $50 an hour and PageMaker saved me 10 hours of work over a 40 hour work week I could potentially increase my profits by $500 a week. So, I may not feel paying $1000 for PageMaker as a bad price. This is why perceived value directly influences marketing strategies. Quality market research is imperative to a company. Market research can yield how much is a consumer willing to pay for a product. This is done by gathering information of consumer needs, trends, wants and competitive usage.
This information will yield information for a companies target market and conceptual market segmentation. This allows for strategic marketing campaigns. In conclusion, I will discuss potential problems Aldus may come across if the decision was made to go after the selling of products to organizational buyers. A potential problem for Aldus is acquisition. For example, Apple was experiencing internal problems during the time Aldus introduced its product Apple. So, the problems of Apple became the problems of Aldus. Therefore, a company must help these organizational buyers solve their problems for it’s own product must hit the market. Another problem that may be countered is the possibility of its product running into opposition with theirs. Finally, directly linking your product to organizational buyer’s business means that your product fails if organizational buyer’s business fail which negatively affects the sales and growth. That was a great potential for Aldus if Apple failed.
Moore, G. (1991) Crossing the Chasm, Harper Collins Publishers, 1991.
9 Philipp Herzog (2007). Open and Close Innovation: Different Cultures for Different Strategies. Trout, J., (1969) “Positioning” is a game people play in today’s me-too market place”, Industrial Marketing, Vol.54, (6), pg. 51–55. Thomas Reynold & Jerry Olsen (2001). Understanding Consumer Decision making: The Means-End Approach to Marketing