We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

Natural Law Has No Serious Weaknesses Essay Sample


Get Full Essay

Get access to this section to get all help you need with your essay and educational issues.

Get Access

Introduction of TOPIC

Natural Law does contain serious weaknesses, first of all it may be regarded as idealistic; Aquinas says that humans have a “tendency to do good and avoid evil”, however provides no basis for this assumption and no evidence to back it up. Furthermore it is based upon single idea of human nature. To be pragmatic however, people have different lifestyles and opinions. Aquinas seems to presume that we are inherently all the same and fit under the bracket of one human nature. For example homosexuality would be persecuted under Natural Law because it doesn’t seek to reproduce, but most would now agree that there is nothing morally wrong with homosexuality.

In being an absolutist theory, Natural Law is ignorant of the situation and thus may fall prey to many of the moral “pitfalls” that come with being unable to employ moral flexibility based upon the situation. Proponents of the theory might say that Natural Law tells us, as humans, to push and become the best we can be. We are told to aim for a purpose and maintain an ordered society. This is important for maintaining an ordered and moral society. However Natural Law could result in poor outcomes if the primary precepts are rigidly adhered to. In terms of sexual ethics, Natural Law would rule out contraception, as an example: the removal of contraception in many strictly religious countries has already led to more and more cases of AIDS across the globe.

We can write a custom essay on

Natural Law Has No Serious Weaknesses Essay Sample ...
According to Your Specific Requirements.

Order an essay

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

Should Health Care and Public Education Is...

Illegal immigration has been a complicated issue for the United States for the last century and a half. With the days of Ellis Island steamboats and open-door policies behind us, we are struggling to define the rights of those people who are coming to our country illegally. A multitude of issues arise from this situation: should illegal immigrants be able to work? Should they receive health care? Should they be educated in the public school system? Should they receive welfare benefits such as food stamps and unemployment checks? These, and many more questions are perplexing our government and its constituents. I have chosen to study two of these issues: health care and education. I will begin by discussing the Pleyer v. Doe case, California ‘s Proposition 187, and the Welfare Reform Act of 1996 as examples of case studies in this field. Background The history of immigration restriction began in...

Euthanasia: Ethics of euthanasia

The Ethics of Euthanasia Morality refers to the determination of right or wrong as upheld by a particular society or group of individuals. The contemporary moral issues related to the current problems that are of controversial nature and in which the community is evenly divided on the opinion they hold of right or wrong. Utilitarianism is one such concept in the field of normative ethics for the purposes of quantifying or justifying the moral standing of an issue within a community. Utilitarianism is a principle proposed by Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill in the 18th century leading to an early 19th century (Hinman 34). The law implies that an action is right if a majority of the people affected by it derive benefits from the work while an action is wrong if it will hurt more people. The pillars of measuring utilitarianism are intensity, duration, certainty or uncertainty, propinquity,...

What is the difference between moral rights...

Rights are legal, social, or ethical principles of freedom or entitlement, they are fundamental normative rules about what is allowed of people according to some legal system, social convention or ethical theory. Rights are of essential importance in such disciplines as law and ethics. According to the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, \"rights structure the form of governments, the content of laws, and the shape of morality as it is currently perceived. Rights can be classified as moral rights and legal rights. There are quite a few differences between legal and moral rights. To begin with, a major difference between these two concepts is that legal rights are claims recognized and delimited by law for the purpose of securing it. The claims are protected by sanctions of a law, imposed by a state and remedy for infringement is provided in its courts of justice for instance companies have the legal right...

Popular Essays


Emma Taylor


Hi there!
Would you like to get such a paper?
How about getting a customized one?