We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

“Nine Ten” by Warren Leight Essay Sample

essay
  • Pages: 3
  • Word count: 627
  • Rewriting Possibility: 99% (excellent)
  • Category: court

Get Full Essay

Get access to this section to get all help you need with your essay and educational issues.

Get Access

Introduction of TOPIC

In reaction to the one act play “Nine Ten” written by Warren Leight. The research I have done and the evidence found in the play proves that this was written about the day before the events of nine eleven in two thousand and one. This play is about jurors complaining of how bad things were when they were called for jury duty and how a couple characters were going to try to get out of jury duty. At the end, a Court Officer won’t listen to their excuses and makes a statement ending the play. What my reaction to the significance of the statement is that, it was kind of ironic because of what happened the day after, and how the jurors thought that things were bad. The Court Officer said that in two to three days that they could go back to their normal lives not knowing about what was going to happen the next day. I think that it taught the jurors that being called for jury duty isn’t bad and it is a simple way of serving their country. Also in context, it would show the assumption that the jurors would be oblivious to the nine eleven events. And that after that day their lives would be changed forever and they would not be able to go back to their normal lives again.

After reading the Court Officers final statement again, I realized that it was

Sorry, but full essay samples are available only for registered users

Choose a Membership Plan
talking about the day before the terrorist attacks on the United States of America. My impression of the jurors before I found out the date is that, the simple task of serving their country was like a burden to them and that they couldn’t bother to do this because it was ruining their day or daily routines. After I found out newly gained information and realized the date, my attitude changed from neutral to being negative towards the actions and thoughts of the jurors. My impression of the jurors changed from their attitudes as being strict and selfish to them being unknowing and uncivilized. The juror’s attitudes changed to being unknowing and uncivilized because each citizen has a duty whether it’s voting, working, etc. and that they must live up to their duty and if they don’t in some cases they can be looked down upon. And citizens don’t know when things are going to happen and how things are going play out, therefore if a tragic event occurs they are daunted with guilt from the act of having their actions and thoughts.

I believe the play should have a major impact on its reader’s even if it is on any event that had happened in history. How it had impacted me and how I think it had impacted many of its other readers is how people take their right to citizenship for granted. And that they don’t realize their freedom can be taking away easily and through, in this case, terrorist attacks or a simple thing like; being persecuted for stealing food. Warren Leight’s purpose I believe for creating this one act play is to highlight the issue of being a citizen and the duties that follow being a citizen; including the citizen’s beliefs and how they are against certain duties of being a citizen. The message that was created in this one play by Warren Leight that I had gotten is we as citizens shouldn’t complain about doing a simple thing because in the long run something tragic could happen to bring on guilt. Another message I got is things can get a lot worse than they already are.

We can write a custom essay on

“Nine Ten” by Warren Leight Essay Sample ...
According to Your Specific Requirements.

Order an essay

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

Economic Outlook for the Region

A prime mover is someone who has responsibilities or control over a business in order to execute a plan. Three pros that explains this in relation to CARICOM will be; 1. One of the benefits that CARICOM members got from this was being able to trade free within regions from the year 1974 when they initiated it. They removed all barriers to help this decision be actioned, this did not only improve revenue but it also improved the relationships with the members of states, which encouraged more trading of goods and services. 2. They improved the standard of living by creating better employment opportunities for their citizens. This also helped citizens of each member state to get the opportunity to leave their state to go to another to work, this was possible for them through the elimination of the work-permit system, definite entry for the six months period, the rights to...

The Supreme Court of the United States

One can observe that Mr. Dwight Dexter’s rights were not upheld in the case Dexter v. Michigan State Prosecutor.. His rights that were not upheld including rights in the Fourth, Fifth and Sixth Amendments, such as the right to a fair trial ,and the right to a search warrant. The following evidence will give fact of the matter that Dexter’s rights were not upheld throughout the steps of the criminal justice system. Sheriff Dodd’s actions violated the rights of Dexter. According to the notes from Sheriff Dodd, he had searched Dexter’s car without a search warrant. That is a violation of the Fourth Amendment, which gives security to unreasonable searches. The prosecution coached Randolph Stone and Morgan Livingston for the trial. Stone admitted in 1999 that he wasn’t supposed to say the fact that Dexter was on foot and without a weapon and he did not confess to any crime....

The Supreme Court and Constitution of the...

The Supreme Court, which is the judicial arm of the government, functions as the interpreter and arbitrator of the Constitution of the US. Essentially, the court rules, or adjudicates, on the previous rulings challenged for their constitutionality. Hence, the Supreme Court is the final court of appeal in the US from inferior federal courts or from state courts in case the constitutional issue is involved. Procedure from Trial to Supreme Court It is critical to understand beforehand that not every case can be heard by the Supreme Court of the US. So as to be heard, a case must involve issues of federal law or rather fall within the jurisdiction of the federal courts. Any case that involves singly an issue of parties within a state, or just state law will likely stay within the state court system and in this case, that state's Supreme Court would be the last...

Popular Essays

logo

Emma Taylor

online

Hi there!
Would you like to get such a paper?
How about getting a customized one?