We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

Performance Rankings At Portland Events Planners Essay Sample

  • Pages: 3
  • Word count: 646
  • Rewriting Possibility: 99% (excellent)
  • Category: cognition idea

Get Full Essay

Get access to this section to get all help you need with your essay and educational issues.

Get Access

Introduction of TOPIC

1. What is your evaluation of the system of performance evaluation Rob is proposing?
My evaluation of the system of performance evaluation Rob is proposing is that I think that although the evaluation will be mostly based off of what the team members think of each other and not really based off of how well the other person did, I believe that this evaluation is a good idea from Rob to get a better understanding of how well his team works together and I like that he received feedback about the performance evaluation before implementing it. There are some downsides to this evaluation, such as, basically the team members will be rating themselves good just because of the salary increase.

I feel like Rob should have waited to tell the team members about the salary increase, because who doesn’t want a salary increase? I think within that performance evaluation form, everyone should have to write a comment about the person they are evaluating and tell Rob what they did to deserve that rating. Also, with the salary increase, I think that Rob should only give a salary increase to the top performer. The person who ranked the highest out of all six of them. But also considering how that would cause controversy, I also believe that Rob should look at the highest rating people and give the top three a

salary increase. I think that is only fair, based on the ratings they will be giving each other. 2.

Sorry, but full essay samples are available only for registered users

Choose a Membership Plan
Explain which two suggestions from the team members you think are the most valid.

The two suggestions from the team members I though were the most valid were Kitty and Laura’s ideas. Kitty talked about how the system is objective and everyone could get the same ratings and that would just mean giving everyone a pay raise. While Laura talked about how she would want feedback about what Rob thought it and discuss the ratings with everyone privately. I believe these two have both the high and low sides of what could go wrong and what can go right with this performance evaluation. With Kitty, she is absolutely right, the performance evaluation could be a complete failure and everyone could give each other tens. It would make the ratings false and ultimately mess up Rob’s plan. While with Laura’s idea, Rob would have to sit down with everyone privately and discuss the feedback given from everyone. This is a good idea, because if he talks to everyone about what they got from everyone (without disclosing names) it could cause less controversy on who gets the salary increase. 3. Considering the nature and size of Portland Events Planners, what type of performance evaluation system do you recommend Rob implement?

I believe that the type of performance evaluation system I would recommend Rob to implement is a 360-degree feedback system. With a 360-degree feedback system Rob would get a complete picture of his team’s performance. In order for that system to work, Rob would need to have a better performance evaluation form, with more detailed information from the employees. Things such as, ‘In your opinion, has this employee done anything to stand out from the rest of the group?’ ‘What has the employee done that has impacted the teams decisions altogether?’ and so on. If he got good feedback from the 360-degree feedback system it could give him a better understanding of who plays what role in the team. Rob would also understand what needs to be fixed within the team when they are working together. He could ultimately solve some of the biggest problems within the group of people and it could make for a better working environment and ultimately help the company succeed more greatly.

We can write a custom essay on

Performance Rankings At Portland Events Planners E ...
According to Your Specific Requirements.

Order an essay

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

Left and Right Side Brained

There is no reason for an argument on which side of the brain is better because they are both used for different functions. A good example would be that most people who are left sided are often more logical than the right. The right side is said to be more intuitive thoughtful and subjective. The right side of the brain theory grew out of the work of Roger W. Sperry. The right side of the brain controls Recognizing faces, expressing emotions, reading emotions, color, images, intuition, and creativity. The left side of the brain control language, logic, critical thinking, numbers, and reasoning. A good thing that you should do is figure out your strengths and weaknesses from both sides, Because the strength of one side will cover the weakness of the other side. In conclusion of the research that the hemispheres of the brain that no one person can be...

The Dramatic Point of View of "Hills...

This story, Hills Like White Elephants, is taken form the Objective (dramatic) point of view where the author is the narrator. The author doesn't enter the mind of the characters at any time. He allows us only to see the characters as we would in real life. This is sometimes called the dramatic point of view. The only way we, the reader, learn anything about them is through what they say about themselves. If the story were told from another point of view it would change completely. If told from the Omniscient point of view, where the author tells the story, the story would have been more informative and descriptive. This point of view is where the author assumes complete knowledge of the characters' actions and thoughts. With this point of view the author can move at will from one place to another and from one character to another and...

Cognitive Resilience in Adulthood

ABSTRACT A resilience framework for understanding cognitive aging implies a search for factors that buffer against existing risk, enabling one to thrive in what might otherwise be adverse circumstances. The cascade of biological processes associated with senescence and a cultural context that does not take into account this biological imperative each create risk for cognitive decline in later adulthood. We propose that (a) engagement, a sustained investment in mental stimulation, and (b) personal agency, which enables one to construct a niche for successful life span development, constitute the centerpiece of cognitive resilience. Numerous factors at the level of the individual and the sociocultural context set the stage for engagement and agency, thereby contributing to life span cognitive resilience, which can in turn impact factors promoting engagement and agency (e.g., health management, disposition affecting how experience in regulated) to support cognitive growth. Cognitive development shows wide variation among individuals through the...

Popular Essays


Emma Taylor


Hi there!
Would you like to get such a paper?
How about getting a customized one?