Resolving Differences Essay Sample
- Pages: 2
- Word count: 343
- Rewriting Possibility: 99% (excellent)
- Category: economic
Get Full Essay
Get access to this section to get all help you need with your essay and educational issues.Get Access
Introduction of TOPIC
The article “Resolving Differences in Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept” tests the hypothesis that differences in willingness either to pay (WTP) or to accept (WTA) are due to substitution between the goods. Firstly, the authors describe general experimental design stating that Hanemann’s model is the best appropriate for measuring divergence. Then the article proceeds to outlining main procedures and obtained results. The authors also pay attention to establishing relations between endowment effect and substitution effect. Finally, the authors draw relevant conclusions summing up main points addressed.
It is necessary to outline that the problem addressed by authors is divergence between in measuring WTP and WTA. Actually, it is noted that this divergence troubled
and is troubling many economists nowadays. Hanemann provides relevant explanation based on economic
It is necessary to agree with many claims posted by authors. For example, Hanemann models to be appropriate for measuring divergence. The authors claim that realizing substitution effect is more significant now and therefore, divergence depends on the degree of substitutability. If the products are substitutable, the vale measures for WTA and WTP converge. Consequently, the less substitutability between goods, the higher the divergence is. Therefore, it is found in the article that for two market goods having close substitute the divergence disappears.
Shogren, J., Shin, S.Y., Hayes D. J., & Kliebenstein J.B. (1994, March). Resolving Differences in Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept. The American Economic Review, 256-270.