We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

Should Purchases Made Over The Internet be Taxable? Essay Sample

essay
The whole doc is available only for registered users OPEN DOC

Get Full Essay

Get access to this section to get all help you need with your essay and educational issues.

Get Access

Should Purchases Made Over The Internet be Taxable? Essay Sample

            Using the internet has become a popular way for many people to shop and one of the main reasons that it remains popular is because customers don’t have to worry about paying taxes on the items they buy. By taxing internet purchases, many people will refrain from this type of shopping, so in order to continue rapidly growing internet sales, there should be no taxes added to purchases made over the internet.

            We learn from (The Institute of Policy Innovation, (P.2) that “The Internet has quickly become the defining element of the last decade of the 20th Century. Whether the Internet continues to be the driving force behind the economy, education and even culture in the next century depends to a large extent on what policies, regulations and taxes—if any—Congress and the states impose on the new medium.

            One of the most pressing issues currently facing the Internet is whether and how to tax it. According to one estimate, 64.2 million adult Americans go online each month. Millions of Americans access the Internet daily for information, to make purchases and even gamble. As a result, businesses across the country have been looking for ways to respond to or incorporate the Internet into their business plans. For example, information is so widespread on the Internet today that Encyclopedia Brittanica recently decided to put its volumes of information on the Internet for free, thereby largely eliminating its business model. Should access to that information on the Internet be taxed?”

            There is certainly, almost nothing left that isn’t taxed by the government. They have persistently made certain that anything that can be sold, be taxed. One of the last places to buy products, without being taxed in on the internet. This freedom should be left untouched by taxes.

            We learn from Deloitte & Touch, Forrester Research, that (P.1) “Business-to-consumer sales are only part of the economic activity generated by the Internet. Companies hire consultants to help them with their web sites, pay to get their Internet service and many other expenses. According to the University of Texas’ Center for Research in Electronic Commerce, the Internet economy—i.e., commerce directly and indirectly a result of the Internet—created $301.4 billion in 1998 and was responsible for 1.2 million jobs nationwide. About a third of that amount, $102 billion, was a direct result of Internet commerce.

            The growth in Internet activity and sales has politicians and bureaucrats at the federal, state and local levels considering several new ways to tax e-commerce. However, states’ attempts to tax the Internet have met with resistance, most notably from Congress. Before states plunge into creating new Internet tax schemes, they should consider their options and whether imposing new taxes, enhancing collection efforts under their current taxing authority, or leaving the Internet tax free is the best economic and tax policy to adopt.”

            Leaving the Internet tax free would be the better choice for consumers as well for those who sell on the internet. It is fair to leave money in the hands of the people, instead of the government taking even more money, than they currently take from people.

            The National Conference of State Legislatures, (p.3) says that, “Some states already tax the Internet. For example, several states have imposed a tax on the cost of using an Internet service provider (ISP) such as America Online. But many don’t want to stop there.

            Federal, state and local governments have the constitutional or statutory authority to collect taxes—such as sales and use taxes and taxes on business income—when people and businesses fall within the governmental body’s jurisdiction. That includes traditional retail sales, catalogue sales and sales made over the Internet.

            The rationale behind the current taxing system is that a customer living within the state’s boundaries benefits from the highways, police and other public services funded by the sales tax. Therefore, the customer has an obligation to pay the tax. People living outside the state’s boundaries are unlikely to benefit from that state’s public services and so should not be obligated to pay the tax.

            However, a number of caveats exist. If a customer buys a product subject to a sales tax in a retail store, the vendor collects the tax at the point of sale and passes it on to the state. If retail vendors take an order over the phone, they are supposed to charge that sales tax if the purchaser lives within the same state. If the customer lives in a different state, vendors do not collect a sales tax. However, unbeknown to most people, the customer may still be obligated to pay a “use” tax to his home state. But the fact is that almost no one does that; for that matter, almost no one knows they’re supposed to.”

            It should be possible for consumers to make purchases over the Internet, without having to worry about all the tax issues.

            (P. 5) Austan Goolsby explains that, “The growing demand for access to and use of the Internet has spawned a number of schemes meant to increase tax revenues. In some cases, those schemes have become formal proposals or legislative language.

            Last year, Sen. Ernest Hollings (D-S.C.) introduced his “Sales Tax Safety Net and Teacher Funding Act” (S. 1433), which would impose a 5 percent sales tax on all retail sales over the Internet and through mail order. Money collected from the tax would be sent to the U.S. Treasury and deposited in the “Sales Tax Safety Net Trust Fund.” That money would ultimately be distributed to the states based on a formula and used primarily to increase teachers’ salaries. If salaries were already high in the state, the funds could go for other educational purposes.

            Hollings’ proposal in its current form is visible and taxes all sales at the same rate. It has minimal privacy problems because the buyer’s residence is irrelevant; the customer pays the same tax irrespective of his residence or the vendor’s location. As a result, very little or no information is needed about the buyer, except for the expensive shipping purposes.

            However, the Hollings bill would represent a new and unprecedented federal incursion into state activities. Apparently, the states would be unable to collect any sales or use taxes on merchandise bought online or through mail order. Thus it is unlikely that a state could collect use taxes from one of its citizens who had bought cigarettes over the Internet in order to avoid the state’s taxes. While states don’t collect a lot of money through use taxes, the Hollings bill may undermine any future attempts to do so, costing the states revenue.

            But wouldn’t those losses be more than made up when the states receive their share of the tax? Probably, but that money comes with strings attached. It must be used on education, and so would not be available for general revenues.

            The National Governors’ Association (NGA) has gone far beyond the issue of whether or how to tax Internet access and sales. It envisions restructuring the states’ sales tax systems nationwide. By so doing, it hopes to make collecting taxes on mail-order and Internet sales much easier. According to the NGA, “The proposal’s key tenet is to achieve significant simplification of sales tax systems to match the rapid evolution of the information economy and global trade.”

            Robert Ingrassia says that, “While states may have the right under current law to levy taxes on Internet access, use and sales, most don’t. And that’s the way it should be. There are some reasons for taxing the Internet; there are a lot more reasons not to. States don’t need the money—they are having difficulty giving back all of the extra money they already have. And there is no consistency from them when it comes to tax fairness. So there is little reason to believe that the states will get an Internet tax fair. And considering the harm a tax is likely to do to the growth and development of the Internet, it makes perfect sense for the fifty states—at least for now—to see, clearly, the Internet as a tax-free zone.”

            Just because a tax can be applied to internet sales, doesn’t mean it has to be done.

It’s fair to leave the Internet as it stands. We must retain some of our privileges, without taxes being imposed.

            There is no fair tax, so it should be fair to leave the Internet purchases, tax-free, without other hands going into the pot. There is no need for any type of tax to be charged on Internet sales, so individuals should stand strong and remind the government that our tax-free Internet purchases should be just that.

Reference Page

Deloitte & Touche. 17 Million US Households To Shop Online. Forrester Research. P. 1.

            1999.

Goolsby, Austan. In A World Without Borders. The Impact of Taxes on Internet

            Commerce. P.5. 2004.

Ingrassia, Robert. Council Okays Tax Breaks for Expansion. Dallas Morning News. P.4.

Matthews, Merrill. Should We Tax The Internet?. Institute For Policy Innovation. P. 2.

The National Conference of State Legislatures. State Budget and Tax Actions

            (P. 3). 1998.

We can write a custom essay

According to Your Specific Requirements

Order an essay

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

Internet Security Cameras

What features mentioned in 1984 have become true in our present day society? George Orwell wrote a dystopia which in that time (1949) may have seemed like pure fantasy. Nonetheless, present time has proven to be scarier than fiction itself for the line which separates reality from the fictional world Orwell created is uncertain now. Among some of the most deliberated parts of the novel...

The most common social networks

Facts:  Acquisition accelerated Facebook’s ability to bring connectivity and utility to the world;  Leading mobile messaging company operated independently and retain its brand;  WhatsApp co-founder and CEO Jan Koum to join Facebook Board of Directors. Facebook, MENLO PARK, CALIF, on February 19, 2014, announced that it has reached a definitive agreement to acquire WhatsApp, a rapidly growing cross-platform mobile messaging company, for...

London Knights Situation analysis

In order to find out an in depth information about the London Knights so I've decided to carry out a secondary and primary research. I used the Internet as part of my secondary research. The Internet was very important because I've got a lot of competitors' corporate information, which I can present in this report and they were very relevant. I also used the London...

Using the Internet

What I want to find out:- 1. What is the process of cloning? 2. Disadvantages of cloning? 3. Types of cloning? 4. Materials needed for cloning? Search engines which I will use:- www.ixquick.com Ixquick search results are more comprehensive and more accurate. Ixquick's unique capabilities include a Universal Power Search, a global search and power refinement. As you search, it has stars which give a...

Phorm and its Webwise Scheme

Phorm is an American company which is working with British internet service providers (ISP)[1], to introduce a new scheme called ‘Webwise’, where it would collect information on an individual’s web browsing behaviour. This information would be used to deliver targeted advertising to the end users. The system would collect information by deep packet inspection which would inspect the contents of each webpage requests by a...

Get Access To The Full Essay
icon
300+
Materials Daily
icon
100,000+ Subjects
2000+ Topics
icon
Free Plagiarism
Checker
icon
All Materials
are Cataloged Well

Sorry, but copying text is forbidden on this website. If you need this or any other sample, we can send it to you via email.

By clicking "SEND", you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy. We'll occasionally send you account related and promo emails.
Sorry, but only registered users have full access

How about getting this access
immediately?

Become a member

Your Answer Is Very Helpful For Us
Thank You A Lot!

logo

Emma Taylor

online

Hi there!
Would you like to get such a paper?
How about getting a customized one?

Couldn't Find What You Looking For?

Get access to our huge knowledge base which is continuously updated

Next Update Will Be About:
14 : 59 : 59
Become a Member