We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

Social Media and Free Speech in Education and Sport Essay Sample

essay
The whole doc is available only for registered users OPEN DOC

Get Full Essay

Get access to this section to get all help you need with your essay and educational issues.

Get Access

Social Media and Free Speech in Education and Sport Essay Sample

Citizens, including students, are guaranteed the constitutional right of freedom of ​ speech​ . […] the question becomes, how should administrators balance students’ First Amendment rights with the school’s responsibility to regulate student ​ speech​ that is disparaging to staff members or coaches or disruptive to the educational environment or team dynamics? The phenomenon of ​ social media​ in its various forms; Facebook, MySpace, Twitter, among others­ has presented school administrators and coaches with a new twist on an old issue: criticism by students and student athletes in the scholastic setting. Instead of sending hate mail to the coach, or posting a caricature of the principal in the cafeteria, students now can quickly disseminate, to a vast authence, public criticism of school officials, complete with pictures and video. Citizens, including students, are guaranteed the constitutional right of freedom of ​ speech​.

Therefore, the question becomes, how should administrators balance students’ First Amendment rights with the school’s responsibility to regulate student ​ speech​ that is disparaging to staff members or coaches or disruptive to the educational environment or team dynamics? In the summer of 2011, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit wrestled with the competing interests of “safeguarding students’ First Amendment rights and protecting the authority of school administrators to maintain an appropriate learning environment” in the case of J. S. v. Blue Mountain School District,T\\e case involved a student who was suspended for creating a fictitious MySpace profile regarding her middle school principal. The student’s parents sued the school system on her behalf for violating her First Amendment right to ​ free speech​ . Facts of the Case

J.S. was an eighth­ grade student with no history of disciplinary problems until she was disciplined for dress code violations by her principal, James McGonigle. J.S. responded by creating a fake MySpace profile of the principal on the​ social​ networking web site, from her home on her parents’ computer. The profile used McGonigle’s official photograph from the school web site, but did not identify him by name, or location. The profile was described by the court as disturbing, vulgar, and offensive, portraying McGonigle as a bisexual pedophile, and containing profane language directed at the principal and his family. In her deposition, J.S. testified that she intended the profile to be a joke, and she thought it was comical because it was so outrageous.

Initially the profile was public and could be viewed by anyone. The following day J.S. made the profile private, after several students made comments to her at school, so it could only be viewed by 22 of her friends online. McGonigle learned of the profile from another student, and after a subsequent investigation, J.S. was suspended for 10 days for violations of the school disciplinary code, specifically for making false accusations about a staff member and using the school web site photo of McGonigle without permission. After her suspension, J.S. sued the school district for violating her First Amendment rights by punishing her for off­ campus online ​ speech​.

Case Analysis
Courts have long recognized the far ­reaching authority of school officials to govern student behavior and have been reluctant to interfere in resolving conflicts that arise in the regular operation of school systems. The U.S. Supreme  Court has attempted to balance the comprehensive authority of school officials and the protection of students’ ​ free speech​ rights in the special context of the educational environment. Students do not “shed their constitutional rights to freedom of ​ speech​ or expression at the schoolhouse gate” ( Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community Sch. Disi, 1969). The U.S. Supreme Court in Tinker established that school officials will only be justified in prohibiting student expression if they can demonstrate that the student’s conduct would materially and substantially interfere with the requirements of appropriate discipline in the operation of the school. In a series of later cases, the Supreme Court held that the general rule in Tinker is subject to several narrow exceptions in which the school may restrict student speech​ without a significant fear of disruption in the academic setting. School officials may regulate profane and “plainly offensive” ​ speech​ in school (Bethel Sch. Dist. v. Fraser, 1986).

Student ​ speech​ may also be restricted during school sponsored activities such as a school newspaper Hazelwood Sch. Dist. v. Kuhlmeier, 1988). The Supreme Court most recently restricted student ​ speech​ advocating illegal drug use at a school­ sponsored and supervised event [Morse v. Frederick, 2007). These narrow exceptions do not directly address the issue of off­ campus Internet use that specifically targets school personnel; therefore, courts have been divided as to how to apply these guiding cases. The issue before the Third Circuit was whether the school district violated J.S.’s right of freedom of ​ speech​ when it suspended her for her ​speech​ on the Internet. Using Tinker and its later exceptions, the appellate court wrestled with the question of how off campus generated ​ social media​ targeting school officials should be characterized. Previously, the District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania granted summary judgment in favor of the school district, holding that J.S.’s lampooning of her principal did not cause a “substantial.

We can write a custom essay

According to Your Specific Requirements

Order an essay

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

Economic Outlook for the Region

A prime mover is someone who has responsibilities or control over a business in order to execute a plan. Three pros that explains this in relation to CARICOM will be; 1. One of the benefits that CARICOM members got from this was being able to trade free within regions from the year 1974 when they initiated it. They removed all barriers to help this decision be...

The Supreme Court of the United States

One can observe that Mr. Dwight Dexter’s rights were not upheld in the case Dexter v. Michigan State Prosecutor.. His rights that were not upheld including rights in the Fourth, Fifth and Sixth Amendments, such as the right to a fair trial ,and the right to a search warrant. The following evidence will give fact of the matter that Dexter’s rights were not upheld throughout...

The Supreme Court and Constitution of the...

The Supreme Court, which is the judicial arm of the government, functions as the interpreter and arbitrator of the Constitution of the US. Essentially, the court rules, or adjudicates, on the previous rulings challenged for their constitutionality. Hence, the Supreme Court is the final court of appeal in the US from inferior federal courts or from state courts in case the constitutional issue is involved....

The case of Georgia vs Gregg

In the case of Georgia vs Gregg, a jury found the defendant guilty of both armed robbery and murder. After robbing and killing two men, Gregg was tried, heard and convicted on two counts of murder and armed robbery. During the penalty stage that followed the trial, a judge found fair reasoning to recommend to the jury the option of either a death sentence or...

How Successful was Wolsey's Domestic Administration of...

Wolsey was born in Ipswich in 1472 to a working class family. He was a talented scholar who progressed from being the Rector of Limington in 1500 to being Henry VIII's highest advisor by 1514. Giustininani, the Venetian ambassador at the time, talks of Wolsey's "vast ability". Qwyn also says Wolsey, "combined both enormous ability and unstoppable determination." He progressed to Lord Chancellor, ruling the...

Sorry, but copying text is forbidden on this website. If you need this or any other sample, we can send it to you via email.

We can't stand spam as much as you do No, thanks. I prefer suffering on my own.
logo

Emma Taylor

online

Hi there!
Would you like to get such a paper?
How about getting a customized one?