We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

Social Network Site Essay Sample

essay
The whole doc is available only for registered users OPEN DOC
  • Pages:
  • Word count: 1366
  • Category: internet

Get Full Essay

Get access to this section to get all help you need with your essay and educational issues.

Get Access

Social Network Site Essay Sample

First of all, let us understand what it is we are debating here. We are debating social networking sites. Not just one or two specific sites, like Facebook, or Myspace, but social websites as a whole. So let us put forth a strong definition to fit the topic.

Social Networking Site: Any websites which facilitates communication between two or more individuals.

So what we are really talking about here is communication between human beings, online, rather than through any other medium (telephone, letter, face to face, ect.) I will be blunt, it is asinine to propose that something which facilitates communication between human beings could somehow be more harmful than good. Social networking websites allow for human interaction over great distances. They allow people globally to connect with one another, share ideas, express desires, form bonds of friendship, and discuss similar interests. We live in an age where if someone feels alone or isolated, quickly using a search engine like Google could bring you to a forum of people who share your same feelings, alleviating the pain of solitude.

Social networking sites allow humans a place to retreat to after a hard days work, or a long day of school. Indeed, the only difference between a social networking site and a gathering of friends in a public space is that using the website makes it easier to connect! Would my opponent dare propose that social interaction is harmful? Then how can they make such blanket statements about the vast array of websites which do just this, but allow you to, say, keep in contact with not just your friends, but you Uncle in a faraway place, or a loved one half-way across the globe? Indeed, the very idea is preposterous.

As if it were not bad enough, my opponent, in order to justify their claim of social networking sites bringing MORE harm than good (not simply some harm), only gives rise to TWO potential issue; the first one being the medium is public, and can interfere with employment. This proposition my opponent makes is illogical. Let us observe why.

1. This is not the fault of social networking sites

My opponent seems to think that the actions of third parties can somehow justify attacking social networking websites. But this is illogical. To blame social networking sites for something that others do is misplaced blame. The existence of these websites do not force companies and employers to do what they do, they do it of their own desire. And taking away social networking sites will not prevent this from occurring, employers will simply look elsewhere, as they have done, for information on their potential employee.

They’ll call relatives and references, and gain information about you that way. And in older times, when communities were smaller, they would ask around the town for information. So the actions of employers to seek out information on their candidates for hire is nothing new, and cannot be blamed on social networking sites. All these websites do is give employers another potential source of information about you. In of themselves, these sites are harmless, and therefore without blame.

2. This is not a problem with most networking sites

Recalling our definition of social networking websites, most social networking websites will not give rise to his kind of problem, because most websites allow for the creation of “Usernames”, or names specific to an online site. I am sure, for instance, my opponents name in real life is not “szack”, nor is mine “The Chaos Heart”. These are fake names, or online names, made for a specific online environment. Most social websites you encounter on the web will be structured in such a manner, allowing for someone to construct usernames for themselves rather than use their real names. So this complaint my opponent has put forth is all but negligible.

3. You could just not use your real name.

There is an easy solution to this “problem” put forth by opponent, similar to the above critique about usernames. You could just lie about what your real name is. This is actually what I do with my Facebook. This method of networking allows you to hide yourself from unwanted attention, and allow permit those who you wish to see your page to view it. It completely renders
my opponents proposed argument meaningless.

4. The morality of firing someone is questionable

The morality of firing someone simply because they do not enjoy heir job is highly questionable, and I would argue, morally reprehensible. Someone may need a particular job to survive, even if they don’t enjoy it. To fire them for simply not liking what they do, even if they may do it well and efficiently, is disgusting. To this end, we should not be defending such actions in any manner, especially not by criticising institutions like social networking sites.

It’s that companies fire people based on info they find on these sites that is wrong, not that they can access the information in the first place. My opponents argument is the equivalent of saying it is wrong for someone to go outside, because someone might murder them. Going outside isn’t the problem, the problem is that there is someone willing to murder you to begin with. So it is with these websites and companies. The problem isn’t the websites, it’s the companies willing to fire people based on the info they find to begin with.

Now my opponent proposes a second potential issue, which is similar in many ways to the first. That is, it interferes with education, both in terms of studies and application to universities. But these too are illogical complaints.

1. Connection in education is good

My opponent argues, “Go to Yahoo Answers and see how many people use networking to try and answer their math homework or the science equation…” But what my opponent fails to point out is how many of these students, as a result of doing this, learn the information and go on to answer future questions correctly, thereby having bettered themselves as students. There is nothing wrong with asking for help, either from professors or peers, and it is something which is often encouraged by educators.

Several of these Yahoo Answers give detailed responses on how to solve any particular problem, and are vital resources for which students are able to easily gain the knowledge they need, and further their education. Further more, taking away social networking sites will not prevent this connection to occur; again, like with the example of employers above, students will simply do what they have done in the past. they will form study groups, call one another, discuss things before or after class, ect. Social networking websites then can hardly be held responsible for this behavior, as it is something done without it. Like with the issue above with employment, all these websites do is make getting the information easier.

2. The argument of application and universities is the same as before

My four above points about employers and jobs can be taken, reworded a little, and used again for this exact argument. This behavior is not the fault of social networking websites, but the fault of universities, who would and have done this with or without these websites. Most of these websites allow for the creation of usernames, and even if they don’t, you can simply lie about what your real name is. And finally, the morality of not accepting a student based on something you find on their personal profile is questionable, and therefore, the problem isn’t social networking sites, but universities engaging in this behavior to begin with.

3. My opponent’s own source argues against them

My opponent’s edudemic article lists within it 5 major reasons why social networking within schools is a GOOD thing, in addition to the 5 points it makes about the negatives. I do not have enough characters left to quote them, but they are easily read by anyone who clicks my opponent’s link.

I turn it over to my opponent.

We can write a custom essay

According to Your Specific Requirements

Order an essay

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

Internet Security Cameras

What features mentioned in 1984 have become true in our present day society? George Orwell wrote a dystopia which in that time (1949) may have seemed like pure fantasy. Nonetheless, present time has proven to be scarier than fiction itself for the line which separates reality from the fictional world Orwell created is uncertain now. Among some of the most deliberated parts of the novel...

The most common social networks

Facts:  Acquisition accelerated Facebook’s ability to bring connectivity and utility to the world;  Leading mobile messaging company operated independently and retain its brand;  WhatsApp co-founder and CEO Jan Koum to join Facebook Board of Directors. Facebook, MENLO PARK, CALIF, on February 19, 2014, announced that it has reached a definitive agreement to acquire WhatsApp, a rapidly growing cross-platform mobile messaging company, for...

London Knights Situation analysis

In order to find out an in depth information about the London Knights so I've decided to carry out a secondary and primary research. I used the Internet as part of my secondary research. The Internet was very important because I've got a lot of competitors' corporate information, which I can present in this report and they were very relevant. I also used the London...

Using the Internet

What I want to find out:- 1. What is the process of cloning? 2. Disadvantages of cloning? 3. Types of cloning? 4. Materials needed for cloning? Search engines which I will use:- www.ixquick.com Ixquick search results are more comprehensive and more accurate. Ixquick's unique capabilities include a Universal Power Search, a global search and power refinement. As you search, it has stars which give a...

Phorm and its Webwise Scheme

Phorm is an American company which is working with British internet service providers (ISP)[1], to introduce a new scheme called ‘Webwise’, where it would collect information on an individual’s web browsing behaviour. This information would be used to deliver targeted advertising to the end users. The system would collect information by deep packet inspection which would inspect the contents of each webpage requests by a...

Get Access To The Full Essay
icon
300+
Materials Daily
icon
100,000+ Subjects
2000+ Topics
icon
Free Plagiarism
Checker
icon
All Materials
are Cataloged Well

Sorry, but copying text is forbidden on this website. If you need this or any other sample, we can send it to you via email.

By clicking "SEND", you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy. We'll occasionally send you account related and promo emails.
Sorry, but only registered users have full access

How about getting this access
immediately?

Become a member

Your Answer Is Very Helpful For Us
Thank You A Lot!

logo

Emma Taylor

online

Hi there!
Would you like to get such a paper?
How about getting a customized one?

Couldn't Find What You Looking For?

Get access to our huge knowledge base which is continuously updated

Next Update Will Be About:
14 : 59 : 59
Become a Member