We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

The Differences and Similarities of the Book Divergent Essay Sample

  • Pages: 5
  • Word count: 1,262
  • Rewriting Possibility: 99% (excellent)
  • Category: dystopia

Get Full Essay

Get access to this section to get all help you need with your essay and educational issues.

Get Access

Introduction of TOPIC

The book Divergent by Veronica Roth and the short story “Harrison Bergeron” by Kurt Vonnegut, has similar and different views on how they want their societies to function. In each of these stories, citizens both support and go against the governments’ expectations. The government in each of these stories has ways of overpowering their citizens, which is why Tris, the main character in Divergent, and Harrison, the main character in “Harrison Bergeron” rebel against the governments. The way the societies function, the citizens views of the government and the function of the governments all sum up what each of the societies believe about human beings, life and the world. The function of societies in each of the stories has similar and different ways of working. In Divergent, there are five factions or groups: Erudite, Amity, Candor, Abnegation and Dauntless. The Erudites are filled with knowledge, which is why many people in this faction are teachers.

The role of Amity in society is to cultivate strong peaceful relationships with everyone. They are trustworthy, kind, self-sufficient, and forgiving. The faction of Candor is known for telling the truth and nothing but the truth. Not only are they truthful but they are also fair and impartial with their judgments. Abnegation, meaning self-denial, is the faction that has many leaders in government. They enjoy taking care of other people and making others happy. This is the faction that Tris was born into. Finally, the last faction is Dauntless. The members of Dauntless are usually fearless and not discouraged when in the face of danger. This is also the faction that Tris switches to. Veronica Roth describes each of the faction’s roles of the society as: “Working together these factions have lived in peace for many years, each contributing to a different sector of society. Abnegation has fulfilled our need for selfless leaders in government;

Candor has provided us with trustworthy and sound leaders in law; Erudite has supplied us with intelligent teachers and researchers; Amity has given us understanding counselors and caretakers; and Dauntless provides us with protection from threats both within and without.” (43) This sums up each of the roles of the factions. In “Harrison Bergeron”, society is created so that everyone is equal. Not only are they equal before God and the law, but they are equal in every way possible. There was no one that was stronger, quicker, smarter, or prettier than someone else. Vonnegut stated that “…all this equality was due to the 211th 212th 213th Amendments to the Constitution and to the unceasingly vigilance of agents of the U.S. handicapper general.” In Divergent and in “Harrison Bergeron”, their societies were created so that the citizens could be treated equally. They differ because in each faction of Divergent, everyone isn’t equal.

In Divergent and “Harrison Berger

on”, societies not only have different functions, but the citizens in each have different views on

Sorry, but full essay samples are available only for registered users

Choose a Membership Plan
the societies. The citizens in “Harrison Bergeron” and Divergent agree and disagree with the rules of the government. In “Harrison Bergeron”, George and Hazel, Harrison’s parents, agree with society because they don’t want it to be like it was before year 2081. George tells Hazel that he does not want to compete with everybody again stating: “… and pretty soon we’d be right back to the dark ages again, with everybody competing against everybody else. You wouldn’t like that, would you? ‘I’d hate it.’ Hazel said. ‘There you are’ said George. ‘The minute people start cheating on laws what you think will happen with society?’…” This means that he doesn’t want society to be like it was before, and neither does Hazel. In other ways, some people disagree with the society.

For instance, Harrison is put into jail because he is extremely intelligent, an athlete and under-handicapped. To him, this is not fair. In Divergent, many members of each faction agree with how things are run. For example, the mother and father of Tris don’t want anything to be changed because they feel it might disrupt the way the factions have been flowing. Tris on the other hand, does not agree with how the government is run. She thinks that Erudite is trying to start a war against Abnegation because of reports that Jeanine Mathews, the leader of the Erudite, wrote about the Abnegation.

Tris says about the reports that: “…The reports that labels my family as corrupt, power-hungry, moralizing dictators? The reports that carry subtle threats and hint at revolution? They make me sick to my stomach. Knowing that she (Jeanine Mathews) is the one who released them makes me want to strangle her…” (360) In this statement, Tris does not agree at all with what Jeanine has written about her family, but she decides to lie and say she does agree so that it doesn’t raise any suspicion. In both of these stories, the citizens agree and disagree with the rules of the society. Not only do the citizens have certain views on the function of society, but they also have different opinions of the leaders in government.

In the society of Divergent, and the society of “Harrison Bergeron,” there is one head person that governs the society. In Divergent, Jeanine Mathews is the head of the Erudite but she is basically the head of each of the factions. Even though Abnegation is the one that has most of their people in the government, Jeanine feels as if she is the one that runs things. She almost succeeds in starting a war against Abnegation saying to Tris that: “currently, the factionless are a drain on our resources. As in Abnegation. I am sure that once the remains of your old faction are absorbed into the Dauntless army, Candor will cooperate and we will finally be able to get on with things.” (429, 430) This means that Jeanine wants Abnegation and everyone else to be easily controlled.

In “Harrison Bergeron”, Diana Moon Glampers is the Handicapper General (H-g). She is the one that makes the decisions about what type of handicap the citizens would need. She is also the one that kills Harrison after he escaped from jail. Both of these women have similar and different ways of running their societies. Jeanine Mathews wants everything her way and will stop at nothing to get it.

This is why there is a war on Abnegation. In some ways, this is how Diana Moon Glampers is because she doesn’t want Harrison to run free, so she kills him, not caring who his death might effect. Jeanine Mathews, the leader of Erudite in Divergent, and Diana Moon Glambers, Handicapper General in “Harrison Bergeron”, play large roles in the decisions that the societies make. Both Divergent and “Harrison Bergeron” have similar and different views on their cultures. Each story has unique ways of explaining their societies. The way the societies function, the citizens views on the societies, and the way the governments are ran, each explain the way of life in “Harrison Bergeron” and Divergent.

Works cited

Roth, Veronica. Divergent. New York: HarperCollins, 2011. (43) Roth,
Veronica. Divergent. New York: HarperCollins, 2011 (360) Roth, Veronica. Divergent. New York: HarperCollins, 2011 (429-430) Vonnegut, Kurt. “Harrison Bergeron”. (1)

Vonnegut, Kurt. “Harrison Bergeron”. (2-3)
Vonnegut, Kurt. “

We can write a custom essay on

The Differences and Similarities of the Book Diver ...
According to Your Specific Requirements.

Order an essay

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

The Speculative Voice - Huxley vs Niccol...

The purpose of the speculative voice is to not only to warn people of inhumane trends developing into widely accepted culture but also to make people reconsider the whole idea of a "utopian society". The idea that a world can be a place of perfect equality between all humans and still have stability is an idea that if put into practice is sure to fail and cause upheaval and possibly the demise of humanity itself. A composer’s outlook on creativity comes from their contextual background, whether it be their social, cultural, political or personal history, their context has a profound effect on their texts. Aldous Huxley's dystopian novel "Brave New World", published in 1932, explores the issues that can evolve from a totalitarian society where technology is considered more important than human values. Similarly in Andrew Niccol's 1997 film "Gattaca" people are dehumanised and branded by their genetic makeup. Though...

Reflection: 1984 or Shake Hands With The...

When I read George Orwell's dystopian masterpiece, "1984," I realized it was intended by its author to act as an entertaining suspense-narrative and also as a warning to future generations. The story probes deep ideas related to the influence of tyranny in human society. The motivation for Orwell's writing of the novel is due to Orwell's belief that the society imagined in "1984" was a logical possibility. The novel is, as one literary critic remarked, a "satirical novel about the future[...] a very vivid presentation of the terror that could occur in the near future" (Meyers, 1997, p. 277) and it was this aspect of the novel which struck me as the most profound. How much of it is true today? How much of it would I notice consciously? Have I already been brainwashed? To engage readers' emotions, Orwell includes a love story in "1984." During the first part of...

1984 and Brave New World

Thesis Statement After going through both the pieces of literature, it transpires that both differences and similarities exist between Brave New World and 1984. They are both prophetic novels, they were both written in turbulent times, both suffering changes that could lapse the future of the world. At the time 1984 was written, the world had just gotten out of a second war and the surprising rise of communism and their totalitarian government was frightening most of the western world. Introduction In George Orwell's novel, the main concern seems to be the overtaking of a supreme, socialist totalitarian government/dictatorship. On the other hand, when Brave New World was written, the world had just been swept by a wave of mass production and consumerism, and that too is reflected in Aldous Huxley's ultra-modern, test-tube baby, sleep-taught society. That is exactly what makes the two novels so alike and so different at...

Popular Essays


Emma Taylor


Hi there!
Would you like to get such a paper?
How about getting a customized one?