We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

The doctrine of separation of powers Essay Sample

essay
The whole doc is available only for registered users OPEN DOC

Get Full Essay

Get access to this section to get all the help you need with your essay and educational goals.

Get Access

The doctrine of separation of powers Essay Sample

What is the relevance of the doctrine of separation of powers in the modern society? Brings about the aspect of democracy. This is because the powers of the government are limited by the people since it’s a government of the people. No organ is above the other thereby ensuring all are equal. Brings about accountability of the different organs of the government. This is brought about by the checks and balances which are provided for in the constitution. Each organ keeps the “other on toes. ” Why is it necessary to separate powers? Prevent arbitrary power.

No single organ should have too much power. The different organs of government are supposed to compliment and assist each other in carrying out their duties. If one organ were more powerful than the other, it would lead to a form of dictatorship since that organ would have no one to stop it from doing as it wishes. Too much power should be limited in a way. Prevent abuse of power. This is because the organs are each in a way the others bodyguards, should the organs say be one or one of the organs have unlimited and unchecked power, it is likely to abuse its power.

Separation of power ensures that no single organ is able to abuse its power on account of the other organs are there to curtail any excesses of power. How is the doctrine of separation of powers applied in the various arms and levels of government under the new Kenya Legal system effective August 27, 2010? Independence of the judiciary. (Act 160 of the constitution) The independence of the judiciary is needed to protect the rights of the people.

It’s also responsible for the effective administration of justice in the country and thus has a duty to protect the people from the excesses powers of the government and action of the government. The judiciary is also the guardian of the constitution. It ensures that the executive actions of officials are in accordance with the provisions of the constitution and acts passed by parliament do not conflict with it. The law courts must be open to all persons. Thus it is said to be independent when all these decisions can be made without any fear or biasness.

The independency of the judiciary is assured by the provisions of the constitution. The legal profession. Critically examine the role of an advocate in Kenyan society in general, and in the judicial process in particular. Advocates help the court in achieving its duties through research and presentation of evidence to the court, leaving the courts with the duty of determining the outcome which considerably lessens the courts workload. Helps in realizing constitution rights. Advocates play a major role in representing people in courts and thus enable them to have access to justice.

Providing legal advice. Advocates play a major role in society by playing an advisory role to citizens in general who may have a legal problem or may be just curious about the law and how it works. What knowledge and skills does an advocate need in order to effectively play these roles? Requires knowledge of substantive law. Needs to know the rights and responsibilities of a Kenyan citizen well. By so doing they can easily tell if a crime has been committed or not, even before going to court to represent their client. Needs to know if a case can be taken to court.

Under what category does the case fall, is it a civil matter or a criminal matter. Needs to know procedural law. Advocates need to know all the processes a case takes from arrest to conviction and in details. Good communication skills. To facilitate proper communication between the advocate and the client, and between the advocate and the juries and judges in the courtroom. Needs to be assertive and fast on their feet since often inside a courtroom, things may tend to change and the case may throw the advocate off balance thus he/she must be quick witted.

Great research skills. This is essential in comprehending your clients, their needs, and to preparing legal strategies. What are the systematic challenges advocates face in their efforts to play these roles effectively in the judicial process? Bulkiness of the law. The law is bulky and as one is working on a case, he/she has to go through volumes of books and countless research. This is stressful and hectic to an advocate who has a limited amount of time to distil all the information into something manageable and logical. Technicality of procedure.

Procedures of the courts tend to be too technical in that many procedures are required even before one can take the matter to court. For example, when serving a plaint one has to have enough copies to give the defendant and then wait for the defences counsel to serve them. It’s generally a tiresome process. Cost. A lot of money is spent during research, filing and also fee to be paid to court depending on the matter. At times, a client may even agree to pay only on completion of the case hence the advocate has to use his/her on own money. Court schedule.

Hearing for cases and especially appeal cases is tiresome since the schedule is usually full. Take for example, the court of Appeal as of last year 2016 August, its official calendar had been booked up to this year 2017 November. This shows how difficult it is for one to even get a hearing in such a court. Complexity of suits. Some suits are complex since they require knowledge of different disciples. In a way, the advocates are required to have knowledge in various fields. For example, in the case concerning separation of Siamese twins, the advocates had to go to medical school to learn the human anatomy.

Alternative dispute resolution. Critically discuss the following alternative dispute resolution mechanisms: Arbitration. It’s the procedure for settling a dispute wherein the parties involved at the formation of a contract decide that if any dispute arise between them at a later stage, they will resolve it through this process only and not in a court of law. A neutral third party is appointed to solve the dispute between the parties and proceed to decide the liability of the defaulting party. Conciliation.

Similar to arbitration but the difference here is that the conciliator shall listen to the parties separately and then together in order to settle the dispute. The conciliator draws out a solution. Mediation. Process wherein a case has already been filed in court and once the judge hears the case decides that the matter can be solved outside the court hence being transferred to a mediation cell, wherein the matter is solved amicably. Solution given by the mediator must be acceptable to both parties.

Equity.

How are these doctrines of equity developed within the legal system?

Legal systems have incorporated mechanism for resolving disputes according to general principles of right. Equity must ensure that those who are harmed can find their relief and not used for unfair purposes.

(1) This Constitution is the supreme law of the Republic and binds all persons and all State organs at both levels of government.
(2) No person may claim or exercise State authority except as authorized under this Constitution.
(3) The validity or legality of this Constitution is not subject to challenge by or before any court or other State organ.
(4) Any law, including customary law, that is inconsistent with this Constitution is void to the extent of the inconsistency, and any act or omission in contravention of this Constitution is invalid.
(5) The general rules of international law shall form part of the law of Kenya.
(6) Any treaty or convention ratified by Kenya shall form part of the law of Kenya under this Constitution.

The difference between the position of equity in the older constitutional dispensation and the current one is that; in the former constitutional order the doctrines of equity applied where written laws did not extend or apply. The new constitutional order changes this position by making the general principles of international law part of the Kenyan law. This means that the doctrines of equity automatically become part of the Kenyan laws without being subject to other statutes, a position it held in the former constitutional order.

We can write a custom essay

According to Your Specific Requirements

Order an essay

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

A Will to Power

That is your entire will, you wisest of men; it is a will to power; and that is so even when you talk of good and evil and of the assessment of values. (pg. 224) This statement from section #203 of the Nietzsche Reader, not only illustrates what Friedrich Nietzsche feels is the origin of value but also culminates his philosophy on what is the...

Bargaining Power of Buyers

Threat of New Entrants Currently there are a few different quantities of choices for Chipotle show in the market, in any case it does not imply that if the market is inundated, new players will not enter. So there is a plausibility of new participants in this industry considering the cost expected to build up such business is not high and it is not troublesome...

Authority and Exercise of Power: Systems of...

The Game Room * The Game Room, a crackhouse owned by Ray, was left to the management of Primo o Primo was granted power to hire and employ his own lookout and workers * Lookouts like Benzie and Caesar however let their status as crack dealers to empower themselves * Benzie would insult his customers and mock their crack-addiction (84) * Both Primo and Benzie,...

How Successful was Wolsey in his Domestic...

Wolsey's rise to power was for many reasons: his low social background drove him to succeed; his force of personality; his natural intelligence - the boy bachelor; his oratory skills and his understanding of the King. Wolsey was blessed with these gifts and with the trust of the King Wolsey had the potential to be great. Wolsey was in the position to do this, so...

How far do the Sources Agree Wolsey...

Source 1, by Polydore Virgil, states that Wolsey was disliked and ‘detested’ by everyone in the country during his time. From this it is easy to gather an image of the extent of the hatred focused towards Wolsey. The source then goes on to say ‘his arrogance and ambition aroused against himself the hatred of the whole country’. Firstly this shows that Wolsey intended to...

Get Access To The Full Essay
icon
300+
Materials Daily
icon
100,000+ Subjects
2000+ Topics
icon
Free Plagiarism
Checker
icon
All Materials
are Cataloged Well

Sorry, but copying text is forbidden on this website. If you need this or any other sample, we can send it to you via email.

By clicking "SEND", you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy. We'll occasionally send you account related and promo emails.
Sorry, but only registered users have full access

How about getting this access
immediately?

Become a member

Your Answer Is Very Helpful For Us
Thank You A Lot!

logo

Emma Taylor

online

Hi there!
Would you like to get such a paper?
How about getting a customized one?

Can't find What you were Looking for?

Get access to our huge, continuously updated knowledge base

The next update will be in:
14 : 59 : 59
Become a Member