We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

The Effect Of Volume Current On The Effectiveness Essay Sample

  • Pages: 5
  • Word count: 1,102
  • Rewriting Possibility: 99% (excellent)
  • Category: physics

Get Full Essay

Get access to this section to get all help you need with your essay and educational issues.

Get Access

Introduction of TOPIC

The immersion heater experiment

Aim – To see the effect of volume current on the effectiveness of an immersion heater heating 75 cm3 of water.

Apparatus: –

Immersion Heater

Small Beaker

Variable resistor




Power pack


Input variable

Current in circuit

Control Variables

Volume of liquid

Type of liquid

Amount of insulation

Size/shape of beaker

Size/shape of immersion heater

Thermometer used

Time readings are taken over

Start temperature of liquid

Output variable

Temperature change in 5 minutes


A small beaker was filled with 75cm3 of water at 24 degrees Celsius. A circuit was made that incorporated an immersion heater, an ammeter, a voltmeter, and a variable resistor.

The immersion heater was placed into the beaker of water and the current was set to maximum on the resistor. Two readings were taken for each set of results.


I predict that the current in the circuit will be proportional to the temperature change i.e. as the current is increased the temperature change will increase as well. This is because if the current increases there will therefore be more heat energy lost from the immersion heater.



Vol. Of H20

Current (A)

Voltage (V)

Temp. change 1

Temp. change 2





































Analysis. As I assumed my predictions have

Sorry, but full essay samples are available only for registered users

Choose a Membership Plan
been proved correct. As the current increases, the temperature change in the water increases as well. This is because as more electrical energy flows through the circuit, the immersion heater produces more useful heat energy. This produces a convection current in the water and causes it to heat up. However, heat energy was lost in other places (parts of the immersion heater that were not in the water and the variable resistor were the main two places) and therefore the results could have been false. The insulation that we used would have helped a bit but did not stop some of the heat energy being lost.

To conclude, I would say that this experiment showed what it was meant to show. The current was directly proportional to the change in temperature i.e. as the current increased the change in temperature changed as well. However, many things still went wrong that could be corrected if the experiment was to be done again.


In my view, the experiment went well. It showed what it was meant to show. However, there were a few anomalies. For example, the temperature differed by more (10oC) when the current reading was 1.76A than when the current reading was 2.51A. This could be because the thermometer was not left for long enough to cool down. If we wanted to have a thermometer that was at the exact same temperature for each experiment then we could have used a new one each time. This may also be because the water started off at a different temperature. If I did the experiment again I would probably get my water from a container kept at constant temperature. I could also do the experiment again to see of the starting temperature of the water did affect the amount that the temperature changed in a certain amount of time.

Another thing that could have been done was to cover the container that we were doing the experiment in. There is no doubt in my mind that heat energy was lost from the top of the container. We could have used more of the insulating material on top of the beaker to prevent this. We also should have made sure that the heater was completely immersed in the water. If it was not in our experiment then the air surrounding the beaker would have been heated.

If we wanted to make sure that no heat was lost at all from our experiment then we would have to do the experiment in a vacuum. This is of course impossible in our case because we do not have the equipment to do this.

If I was to do the experiment again I would try to iron out all of the anomalies in my results by changing and adapting all of the things that affected my results this time round.

We can write a custom essay on

The Effect Of Volume Current On The Effectiveness ...
According to Your Specific Requirements.

Order an essay

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

Freely falling body definition

Objective: To measure the acceleration of a freely falling body (g) fairly precisely using a Picket Fence and Photogate. Materials: LabQuest, LabQuest App, Picket Fence, Vernier Photogate, clamp or ring stand. Procedure The Photogate was fastened rigidly to a ring stand so the arms could extend horizontally, and so that the entire length of the Picket Fence was able to fall freely through the Photogate. A soft - landing surface was placed beneath to avoid damaging the Picket Fence. The Photogate was connected to DIG 1 of LabQuest and a new file was chosen from the file menu. The free fall data was then calculated by holding the top of the Picket Fence and dropping it through the Photogate, it being released from ones grasp completely before it entered the Photogate. The Picket Fence was carefully released so that it did not touch the sides of the Photogate as it fell and remained...

Finding the Specific Heat of a Metal...

Finding the Specific Heat of a Metal Problem Determine the specific heat of at least two different metals. Compare your results with the accepted values of these metals, which you can find online Background The specific heat capacity of a material is defined as the heat required to raise a unit mass (1 gram) of the substance by a fixed temperature (1 C). This is sometimes also called the specific heat of a material, and is often abbreviated Cp (which stands for heat Capacity at a constant pressure). As we have already covered in class, the heat capacity of water is exactly 1 cal/(g C). It takes 1.00 calorie, to raise the temperature of 1.00 gram of water 1.00 oC. This is how the calorie is defined. If needed, you can convert calories to Joules with the conversion factor 1.000 cal 4.184 Joules When a heated metal cube transfers its...

The Relationship Between the Input and Output...

I have chosen the light dependent resistor (LDR) as the sensor to be used in this practical. I have never used this sensor before but from research I know that the LDR works by changing its resistance as the ambient illumination changes. They are made from cadmium sulphide (CdS). An LDR (the sensor part) How it Works Cadmium Sulphide cells rely on the material's ability to vary its resistance according to the amount of light striking the cell: the more light that strikes the cell, the lower the resistance. Plan The LDR will be used firstly with a multimeter (used as an ohmmeter) to establish the average resistance. Secondly, the LDR will be used in a potential divider circuit so it can be ascertained what the relationship between input and output is, for this is the aim of the experiment. The input shall be light intensity (a light source shall...

Popular Essays


Emma Taylor


Hi there!
Would you like to get such a paper?
How about getting a customized one?