We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

The key changes to audit report Essay Sample

essay
The whole doc is available only for registered users OPEN DOC
  • Pages:
  • Word count: 1126
  • Category: audit

Get Full Essay

Get access to this section to get all the help you need with your essay and educational goals.

Get Access

The key changes to audit report Essay Sample

With focus on the similarities as well as any differences between PCAOB and the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB) auditing reporting requirements. The Key Changes to Audit Report The significant change under the PCAOB Standard and the IAASB Standard is the disclosure of Critical Audit Matters (CAM) and Key Audit Matters (KAM) in the audit report with focus on: The communication of the CAM and KAM. The considerations in determining the CAM and KAM.

Comparison between the PCAOB Standard and the IAASB Standard Under the new regulation, the framework for determining CAM by the PCAOB Standard and KAM by the IAASB Standard is primarily related and begin with what matters should be communicated or needed to be communicated by the auditor to the audit committee (IAASB 2017). The Communication The IAASB and PCAOB indicate that there would be at least one KAM and CAM to be communicated, and the auditor must involve a statement if there is no KAM and CAM recognised in the audit report.

In the condition when such communication may be expected to provide the unfavourable results to the public interest, the IAASB Standard under ISA 701 states that KAM may not be communicated (IAASB 2017). Related to this, the PCAOB declares that the auditor is not required to provide any information related to the company if such information has not been made publicly available by the company itself (IAASB 2017). Unless auditor needs such information to explain the considerations in deciding the matter is a CAM or how it was addressed in the audit (Zietsman et al. 2017).

The Consideration KAM and CAM under both standards are also needed to be communicated in the audit of the current period. The PCAOB, however, presents examples of circumstances when it may be appropriate to report CAM in the previous term. In contrast, the IAASB Standard has not considered these examples. Explain the reasons/motivation for the changes and critique whether these changes are likely to achieve their aims.

The Objectives of The Changes

The aim of the changes is to improve the relevance and usefulness of the audit practice and the audit report, as well as to enhance the transparency about the audit that was performed by the auditor so that it would be more informative for investors and other financial statement users (Lawson 2017). In particular, the PCAOB Standard states that the changes would help prevent the auditor from being the primary source of the disclosures of CAM (Lawson 2014). The Effectiveness of The Changes

The communication of the KAM and CAM may increase the information value of the audit report to financial statement users as they will have more information about the company’s actual condition compared to the prior ‘pass/fail’ form of the audit report which has only provided inadequate information. Even though the previous rule can provide a standardised format and promotes consistency across companies, it does not provide accurate information of the significant judgements, such as company’s financial risks (Lawson et al. 2014).

In light of this, disclosing the KAM and CAM could increase the amount of company-specific information contained in the audit report and thus increase its usefulness. At the same time, the greater quantity and quality report as a result of the disclosures of CAM and KAM would promote better investment decisions. As auditors have unique and relevant insight based on their audits, the disclosures of CAM and KAM provide a greater chance for auditors to express their ideas in the audit report; therefore, the reports would be more relevant and useful for the investors.

Nevertheless, by disclosing CAM and KAM, auditors may be the only source of the disclosures. The traditional reporting model primarily relies on managers to prepare the financial statements and auditors to attest to their conformity with accepted accounting practices (Lawson et al. 2014). However, the new requirements may blur the line between weather management or auditors have primary responsibility for disclosures, and therefore cause auditors to become the only source of information for the users since they have to report company information initially.

Outline the likely impact of the audit reporting on audit practice. The PCAOB and IAASB Standards are required auditors to communicate any matters that have potential as a CAM and KAM. It may result on the managers would be less likely to share information with the auditor if they were required to disclose accounting estimate information. Another impact is related to auditor legal liability as the disclosure requirement may decrease auditor’s legal exposure when audit fails to detect a material misstatement.

As CAM and KAM disclosures would alert users of financial statement about any potential misstatement, jurors may view this as a forewarning of a heightened risk of undetected misstatement. For example, if the auditor disclosed a CAM and KAM because it is difficult for them to gain adequate and relevant evidence to test the company’s investment account, jurors may view that disclosing CAM and KAM as a de facto warning to the users. This is because the auditor has already highlighted that misstatement in the company’s investment account may have gone undetected or uncorrected.

It is important as jurors will be less likely to hold the auditor liable for losses if they believe that the auditors have given advanced warnings of risk to the users (Grennier and Reffett 2016). Importantly, in a condition when audit fails to disclose a material misstatement, jurors will be less likely to detect the auditors negligent when the audit report published a related CAM and KAM compared to when there is no disclosing CAM and KAM in the audit report (Posner 2016).

References

Grenier, Jonathan H and Adrew Reffett 2016 ‘Risk Disclosure Preceding Negative Outcomes: The Effects of Reporting Critical Audit Matters on Judgements of Auditor Liability’, Current Issues in Auditing, Vol. 10 No. 2, pp. P1-P10, July 2016, accessed 25 September 2017, < http://web. a. ebscohost. com/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer? vid=1&sid=63d7f094-ff33-4c0f-8208-b50b716bd5ac%40sessionmgr4009>

IAASB 2017, ‘A Comparison Between The IAASB and The US PCAOB Standards’, The New Auditor’s Report, July 2017, accessed 20 September 2017, <https://www. ifac.org/publications-resources/new-auditor-s-report-comparison-between-iaasb-and-us-pcaob-standards > Lawson, Bradley P. et. all. 2014, ‘PCAOB Proposes Significant Changes to Auditor’s Reporting Model’, The Journal of Corporate Accounting and Finance, November/December 2014, accessed 20 September 2017, < http://onlinelibrary. wiley. com/doi/10. 1002/jcaf. 22005/epdf > Lawson, Bradley P. et al. 2017, ‘Updates and Comparisons Regarding Changes to the Audit Reporting Model in the United States, United Kingdom, and the European Union’, The Journal of Corporate Accounting and Finance’, July/August 2017, accessed 20 September 2017,

< http://onlinelibrary. wiley. com/doi/10. 1002/jcaf. 22278/epdf > Posner, Cydney 2016, ‘Study Finds Disclosure of Critical Audit Matters May Reduce Legal Exposure for Auditors’, Cooley PubCo, 12 September 2016, accessed 1 October 2017, <https://cooleypubco. com/2016/09/12/study-finds-disclosure-of-critical-audit-matters-may-reduce-legal-exposure-for-auditors/> Zietsman, Megan et. all 2017, ‘PCAOB Adopts Changes to the Auditor’s Report’, Heads Up, Volume 24, Issue 16, June 2017, accessed 20 September 2017, <http://deloitte. wsj. com/cfo/2017/07/07/pcaob-adopts-changes-to-the-auditors-report/>

We can write a custom essay

According to Your Specific Requirements

Order an essay

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

Corporate Governance Failure at Satyam

The circumstances under which Satyam's fraud was exposed. This company’s fraud arose from the proposal to acquire the Maytas Infra flopped. According to Ramalinga Raju, “the acquisition was purposed to raise the financial deficit that could be injected in the misstated amount and actual amount with the intent of balancing it.” Additionally, Satyam’s CEO admission in his letter that he played a role in the misrepresentation...

Define Human Resource (HR) Audit

Q.1 Define Human Resource (HR) Audit. What is the need for HR Audit? What are the various approaches to HR Audit? Answer : As the term audit has evolved, It is becoming increasingly specific, until the term functional audit has emerged. The objective of a functional audit is to diagnose, analyze, control, and advise within the boundaries of each functional area of the company. The...

Maintaining the Accountability for the Public

In order to maintain the accountability for the public, the formation of the Malaysian National Audit Department plays a vital role in the process. The National Audit Department was also the foundation in the growth of the public sector accounting in Malaysia. The motive of the formation of National Audit Department is to support the financial management and public accountability through the audit of accounts...

Olympus Case

What is Fraud? Fraud occurs when individuals purposely materially misstate facts with the intent of coercing someone to believe these misrepresentations. Upon believing the misrepresentation, individuals will act upon them and suffer a loss or damages. Fraud occurs in various forms: 1. Misappropriation of assets 2. Fraudulent financial reporting 3. Employee fraud 4. Management fraud The Fraud Triangle * Motive/Incentive: a reason to commit the...

Auditing Reflection

INTRODUCTION This report consists of 5 reflections related to auditing standards and each case was extracted from internet sources. The purpose of this report is to reflect and understand each case. REFLECTIONS First reflection is on China sky case for its non-compliances with SGX. Next is the case on corporate governance where new rules were proposed to improve risk management and risk control. Third will...

Get Access To The Full Essay
icon
300+
Materials Daily
icon
100,000+ Subjects
2000+ Topics
icon
Free Plagiarism
Checker
icon
All Materials
are Cataloged Well

Sorry, but copying text is forbidden on this website. If you need this or any other sample, we can send it to you via email.

By clicking "SEND", you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy. We'll occasionally send you account related and promo emails.
Sorry, but only registered users have full access

How about getting this access
immediately?

Become a member

Your Answer Is Very Helpful For Us
Thank You A Lot!

logo

Emma Taylor

online

Hi there!
Would you like to get such a paper?
How about getting a customized one?

Can't find What you were Looking for?

Get access to our huge, continuously updated knowledge base

The next update will be in:
14 : 59 : 59
Become a Member