We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

The Model Penal Code Essay Sample

essay
The whole doc is available only for registered users OPEN DOC
  • Pages:
  • Word count: 457
  • Category: court

Get Full Essay

Get access to this section to get all help you need with your essay and educational issues.

Get Access

The Model Penal Code Essay Sample

The Model Penal Code (MPC) provides for justification of actions that may otherwise be unlawful but are carried out in the face of imminent danger thus amounting to self defense. Such defenses are exempted from punishment and ratified as acceptable under the circumstances. However, the manner in which a court interprets and applies MPC provisions will depend on the court’s understanding of the circumstances which in turn depends on the presentation of the facts to the court.

The act of lying in court is called perjury which is defined as the act of knowingly making false statements while under oath. In order for the false statement made to qualify as perjury, the statement must be material to the case at hand i.e. the lie should be capable of changing the outcome of the case being deliberated. E.g. lying about one’s age cannot be considered to be perjury unless it is in a situation where age is a key factor like in retirement schemes. As with all other crimes, it must be proven that perjury was aforethought. Perjury is an assault on the sanctity of the legal process and therefore cannot be accepted at all.

Incriminating statements from suspects are necessary to solve cases but such statements are hard to acquire. Police have come up with interrogation methods that rely on deceiving and manipulating suspects so as to acquire incriminating statements. When interrogating suspects, the police normally coerce suspects to provide information through methods which intimidate the suspects leading to forced confessions.

Lying of whichever form cannot be admitted in a court of law. The act of perjury is punishable in a court of law. However some interpretations of facts are not perjury especially where people make inaccurate statements unwillingly.

In order for any evidence to be admitted in court, it must be acquired legally. The proper channels set out by the legal system must be adhered to in order for evidence to be qualified as admissible in court. When a confession is solicited by illegal means, such a confession is inadmissible because the defendant’s lawyer will definitely contest it and have the evidence declared null in the court. When faced with a situation where a confession is solicited through lying to the defendant, I would alert my immediate superior so as to prevent my partner from tarnishing the name of my department. Another reason is that it would be best to report the incident to ensure that the Narcotics Suspect is accorded his or her rights that he or she is entitled to.

References

Schopp, R. (1998). Justification Defenses and Just Convictions. Cambridge University Press.

Leo, R. (2008). Police Interrogation and American Justice. Harvard University Press

We can write a custom essay

According to Your Specific Requirements

Order an essay

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

Economic Outlook for the Region

A prime mover is someone who has responsibilities or control over a business in order to execute a plan. Three pros that explains this in relation to CARICOM will be; 1. One of the benefits that CARICOM members got from this was being able to trade free within regions from the year 1974 when they initiated it. They removed all barriers to help this decision be...

The Supreme Court of the United States

One can observe that Mr. Dwight Dexter’s rights were not upheld in the case Dexter v. Michigan State Prosecutor.. His rights that were not upheld including rights in the Fourth, Fifth and Sixth Amendments, such as the right to a fair trial ,and the right to a search warrant. The following evidence will give fact of the matter that Dexter’s rights were not upheld throughout...

The Supreme Court and Constitution of the...

The Supreme Court, which is the judicial arm of the government, functions as the interpreter and arbitrator of the Constitution of the US. Essentially, the court rules, or adjudicates, on the previous rulings challenged for their constitutionality. Hence, the Supreme Court is the final court of appeal in the US from inferior federal courts or from state courts in case the constitutional issue is involved....

The case of Georgia vs Gregg

In the case of Georgia vs Gregg, a jury found the defendant guilty of both armed robbery and murder. After robbing and killing two men, Gregg was tried, heard and convicted on two counts of murder and armed robbery. During the penalty stage that followed the trial, a judge found fair reasoning to recommend to the jury the option of either a death sentence or...

How Successful was Wolsey's Domestic Administration of...

Wolsey was born in Ipswich in 1472 to a working class family. He was a talented scholar who progressed from being the Rector of Limington in 1500 to being Henry VIII's highest advisor by 1514. Giustininani, the Venetian ambassador at the time, talks of Wolsey's "vast ability". Qwyn also says Wolsey, "combined both enormous ability and unstoppable determination." He progressed to Lord Chancellor, ruling the...

Sorry, but copying text is forbidden on this website. If you need this or any other sample, we can send it to you via email.

We can't stand spam as much as you do No, thanks. I prefer suffering on my own.
logo

Emma Taylor

online

Hi there!
Would you like to get such a paper?
How about getting a customized one?