Course: BACHELOR OF SECONDARY EDUCATION Year and Section: II Resource Teacher: MAMERTO C. EUSEBIO, JR. Signature: Cooperating School: ESTEFANIA MONTEMAYOR NAT’L HIGH SCHOOL
In this Episode, I must be able to:
Write evidence of the application of some guiding principles in the selection and use of teaching strategies
MY PERFORMANCE (HOW I WILL BE RATED)
Field Study 2, Episode 4 – Guiding Principles on the Selection and Use of the Teaching Strategies Focused on: The application of some guiding principles in the selection and use of teaching strategies. Tasks
All tasks were done with outstanding quality; work exceeds expectations 4
All or nearly all tasks were done with high quality
Nearly all tasks were done with acceptable quality
Fewer than half of tasks were done; or most objectives met but with poor quality
Analysis questions were answered completely; an depth answers; thoroughly grounded on the theories; exemplary grammar and spelling 4
Analysis questions were answered completely
Clear connection with the theories
Grammar and spelling are superior
Analysis questions were not answered completely.
Vaguely related to the theories
Grammar and spelling are acceptable
Analysis questions were not answered.
Grammar and spelling unsatisfactory
Reflection statements are profound and clear, supported by experiences from the episode.
Reflection statements are clear, but not clearly supported by experiences from the episode
Reflection statements are shallow; supported by experiences from the episode
Reflection statement are unclear and shallow and are not supported by experiences from the episode 1
Portfolio is complete, clear and well—organized and all supporting documentation are located in sections clearly designated.
Portfolio is complete, clear, well-organized and most supporting documentation are available and/ or in logical and clearly marked locations.
Portfolio is incomplete; supporting documentation is organized but is lacking.
Portfolio has many lacking components; is unorganized and unclear.
On the deadline
A day after the deadline
Two days or more after the deadline
Over- all Score
MARIE JEAN P. PENSON, MAT
Signature of the FS Teacher Date Above Printed Name
Transmutation of score to grade/rating
Score Grade Score Grade 20 – 1.0 – 99 12-13 – 2.50 – 81 18-19 – 1.25 – 96 11 – 2.75 – 78 17 – 1.5 – 93 10 – 3.00 – 75 16 – 1.75 – 90 8-9 – 3.5 – 72 and 15 – 2.00 – 87 7-below – 5.00 – below