We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

The Social Side of Decision Making Essay Sample

essay
The whole doc is available only for registered users OPEN DOC

Get Full Essay

Get access to this section to get all help you need with your essay and educational issues.

Get Access

The Social Side of Decision Making Essay Sample

Introduction

            One of the cleverest things we can do is go beyond our own perspective. Frequent among us see and interpret the world only from our own perception, defining what we experience from a one-point angle, our insights. The initial perspective is when we are feeling a definite way not because of other people who only dish up as trigger on our judgment but because of our own personal issues inside.

Another perspective is that people, by nature, are social beings needy and wanting for emotional and intellectual nurturance, will see things subject to social influences such as friends, peer groups, family members and other institutions of the society; this is because human beings as the basic unit of the society have two ultimate goals which is to be love and accepted. Perhaps, decisions and judgments with the intention to affect not only an individual must regard social factors.

Social Influence

            There are aspects about others that can constrain our actions and manipulate us; this force is what we call the social influence. It is an inevitable force that tends influence the perception of an individual.  Social factors include family as the basic unit of the society, church, government institutions, media, community and other institutions. There are several forms of social influence and conformity is the most common and pervasive form. In this form, an individual tends to act and think defiant (Rashotte).

Social Comparison Theory

            Social comparison theory is the theory that states that people tend to compare themselves with the use of the generalized others. The generalized others are the people surrounding that particular individual, in which that individual compares himself with (Festinger, 1954).

            In the five-unit activity there is a clear manifestation that social comparison theory was evident to the decision of the group members. Jill, for example, formatted or compared his answer with Bennett’s answer; he was highly influenced by the member of the group but he wasn’t still certain if his answer was correct or not.

            Social comparison highly affects an individuals’ perception. Human beings tend to move closer to the ones they actually are alike. One the human beings ultimate goal is to be accepted or loved, the tendency of an individual is to get their perception be affected by other individuals or institutions of the society.

Group Thinking

            One of the goals of group thinking is having a unity within the group. They tend to drive into the same decisions and conclusions because they share the same consensus and they opt to minimize conflict among the members. Groupthink avoids promoting points of view which are outside their consensus (Janis, 1997).

            In the activity the group thinks about the conclusion collectively. Each member of the group gave different answers. Hence, there was diversity among the members but they think as one in giving the conclusion so they arrived at having a single decision. However, groupthink subsequently deprives an individual to think on his own. An individual is rather influenced by the decision of the group, thus he or she cannot state his or her insights because the group members might not accept the proposal.

Groupthink and Attribution Error

            Parallels between the tendency to take credit for success or group-enhancing bias and deny the group’s responsibility for any failure or protecting-protecting bias is a manifestation between groupthink and attribution error. Group-enhancing bias helps us protect our ego and it also helps us to confirm that our goals are being met.

            In the activity the group was seen for having the Group-serving bias and the group-protecting bias because the members of the group think as one to be able to minimize critique and to diminish conflict among the members. Hence, the group showed parallelism between groupthink and attributions error.

Group Polarization

            Group decisions are riskier than that of individual decisions this is because the risk is accumulated (Stoner).

            In the activity, the group decided to take the decision into the riskier side because they decided to do the groupthink and that made it more complicated. However, the group decides through widely examining the decisions of each member of the group. Thus, it does not deprive each member to say their own perceptions and ideas about a problem.

Conclusion

            Group decisions can lead to critical errors in their decisions and judgments. If an individual decision is a risk enough how much more is a group decision? In a group, each member tends to think and be influenced by the perception of the other member’s perception, thus depriving that member to think on his own. However, even if the individual decision is diverse the group tends to come up with one stable decision by weighing the individual decisions of each member.

            Social influence theory plays a big role in the decision of an individual or group; it is inevitable and it can really change the way an individual thinks or perceives. However, social influence somehow deprives an individual to think on his own because he or she might be hesitant that what he or she perceive is wrong. Nonetheless, these social influences are considered as non-dysfunctional.

Reference:

Festinger. (1954). Social Comparison Theory [Electronic Version] from http://changingminds.org/explanations/theories/social_comparison.htm.

Janis, I. M., L. . (1997). Decision making: A psychological analysis of conflict, choice, and commitment. [Electronic Version] from http://www.cedu.niu.edu/~fulmer/groupthink.htm.

Rashotte, L. Social Influence [Electronic Version] from http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/sociology/docs/BEOS_S1413.pdf.

Stoner, J. A. F. Group Polarization [Electronic Version] from http://www.uky.edu/~drlane/capstone/group/gpolar.htm.

We can write a custom essay

According to Your Specific Requirements

Order an essay

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

A Hard Day's Night-Analysis

Start: Just before the rehearsal of And I Love Her , right after the scene where the Grandfather wanders into the lower backstage and appeared on the stage by riding the elevator of the trap door, disrupting the rehearsal of an opera. The five-minute clip I chose starts with Norm and Shake sitting in the hotel room waiting for the Beatles to return. End: When...

How would you see the conflict between...

Conflict can be defined as a process that begins when one party perceives that another party has negatively affected, or is about to negatively affect, something that the first party cares about. Conflict is also an outcome of behaviors and cannot be avoided in an organization as long as organizations continue to use work teams since it is an inevitable aspect of work teams. There...

The conflict between Yusuf and Latifa

The conflict between Yusuf and Latifa, Yusuf has made a new plan to make Bunga Raya get high profits and good performance than other bank. He wants to downsized and completely close several 70 regional branches but it make the employees loss their job and less of customers. Bunga Raya Bank profits is important for Yusuf because he will get bonus if he success in...

Pluralist and radical frame

The first differences between the unitary, pluralistic and radical frame of reference is their view about conflict arises between employees and employers. Unitary theory rejects the basic antagonism between both because this theory insists all the parties might work together for the common goal and shared purpose, so there is no conflict on self-interest. However, pluralistic theory mention conflict is the natural and inevitable issue...

Conflict in the Niger Delta

Gas Flaring Flaring of gas is another environmental challenge experienced in the Niger Delta area. Gas has been flared in Nigeria’s Niger Delta since the beginning of exploitation and exploration of crude oil in the 1950s. Nigeria even with the challenges of energy insecurity and legislative frameworks to combat the dangers of gas flaring still suffers multiple environmental and health issues due to the continuous...

Get Access To The Full Essay
icon
300+
Materials Daily
icon
100,000+ Subjects
2000+ Topics
icon
Free Plagiarism
Checker
icon
All Materials
are Cataloged Well

Sorry, but copying text is forbidden on this website. If you need this or any other sample, we can send it to you via email.

By clicking "SEND", you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy. We'll occasionally send you account related and promo emails.
Sorry, but only registered users have full access

How about getting this access
immediately?

Become a member

Your Answer Is Very Helpful For Us
Thank You A Lot!

logo

Emma Taylor

online

Hi there!
Would you like to get such a paper?
How about getting a customized one?

Couldn't Find What You Looking For?

Get access to our huge knowledge base which is continuously updated

Next Update Will Be About:
14 : 59 : 59
Become a Member