We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

The Supreme Court Essay Sample

essay
  • Pages: 3
  • Word count: 556
  • Rewriting Possibility: 99% (excellent)
  • Category: court freedom

Get Full Essay

Get access to this section to get all help you need with your essay and educational issues.

Get Access

Introduction of TOPIC

The case is Elonis v. U.S. Church and state The Supreme Court decided against reviewing an appeals court’s decision that a suburban Milwaukee school district had erred by holding high school graduation ceremonies in a local church, where students and their families were surrounded by religious artifacts and messages. Full Text The Supreme Court agreed Monday to consider whether violent images and threatening language posted on Facebook and other ​ social media​ constitute a true threat to others or simply the protected rants of someone imbued with what one advocate called “digital courage.” The court accepted the case of a Pennsylvania man who was sentenced to nearly four years in federal prison for posting the ominous photos and making the violent rants on his Facebook page against former co­workers, law enforcement officials and especially his estranged wife. Anthony D. Elonis contends that the postings, which included the lyrics of songs by the rapper Eminem, were ​ free speech​ ­ attempts to deal with the pain of his personal problems and not specific threats to harm anyone.

The justices will consider the case in the term that begins in the fall. Elonis’s attorney, John P. Elwood, said the case presents an oppo

rtunity for the court to reconsider its traditional jurisprudence about how to gauge the seriousness

Sorry, but full essay samples are available only for registered users

Choose a Membership Plan
of a threat in the modern age. “Communication online by email and ​ social media​ has become commonplace, even as the norms and expectations for such communication remain unsettled,” the petition said. “The inherently impersonal nature of online communication makes such messages inherently susceptible to misinterpretation.” Elonis’s effort to have the court review the issue was supported by groups such as the Thomas Jefferson Center for the Protection of ​ Free​ Expression.

It and two other ​free​ speech​ groups said the kinds of threats the court has considered in the past have “been supplanted by anonymous trolls wreaking havoc on message boards and individuals who, perhaps emboldened by too much ‘digital courage,’ treat the internet as a global sounding board where anything goes.” The brief said the court must consider “a new breed of threat cases informed by the internet, ​ social media​ , and other revolutionary developments in communication that earlier cases never contemplated.”

The Obama administration, which did not want the court to take the case, said there was nothing particularly distinguishing or modern about Elonis’s threats, except for the forum. Elonis speculated about blowing up elementary schools and threatened co­workers. He posted about his estranged wife: “There’s one way to love you but a thousand ways to kill you. I’m not going to rest until your body is a mess, soaked in blood and dying from all the little cuts.” When an FBI agent visited Elonis to discuss the postings, Elonis wrote later on Facebook: “Little agent lady stood so close, took all the strength I had not to turn the [expletive] ghost. Pull my knife, flick my wrist and slit her throat.” Elonis’s petition to the court said: “Although the language was ­ as with popular rap songs addressing the same themes ­ sometimes violent, petitioner posted explicit disclaimers in his profile explaining that his posts were ‘fictitious lyrics,’ and he was ‘only exercising [his] constitutional right to freedom of ​ speech​.

We can write a custom essay on

The Supreme Court Essay Sample ...
According to Your Specific Requirements.

Order an essay

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

Economic Outlook for the Region

A prime mover is someone who has responsibilities or control over a business in order to execute a plan. Three pros that explains this in relation to CARICOM will be; 1. One of the benefits that CARICOM members got from this was being able to trade free within regions from the year 1974 when they initiated it. They removed all barriers to help this decision be actioned, this did not only improve revenue but it also improved the relationships with the members of states, which encouraged more trading of goods and services. 2. They improved the standard of living by creating better employment opportunities for their citizens. This also helped citizens of each member state to get the opportunity to leave their state to go to another to work, this was possible for them through the elimination of the work-permit system, definite entry for the six months period, the rights to...

The Supreme Court of the United States

One can observe that Mr. Dwight Dexter’s rights were not upheld in the case Dexter v. Michigan State Prosecutor.. His rights that were not upheld including rights in the Fourth, Fifth and Sixth Amendments, such as the right to a fair trial ,and the right to a search warrant. The following evidence will give fact of the matter that Dexter’s rights were not upheld throughout the steps of the criminal justice system. Sheriff Dodd’s actions violated the rights of Dexter. According to the notes from Sheriff Dodd, he had searched Dexter’s car without a search warrant. That is a violation of the Fourth Amendment, which gives security to unreasonable searches. The prosecution coached Randolph Stone and Morgan Livingston for the trial. Stone admitted in 1999 that he wasn’t supposed to say the fact that Dexter was on foot and without a weapon and he did not confess to any crime....

The Supreme Court and Constitution of the...

The Supreme Court, which is the judicial arm of the government, functions as the interpreter and arbitrator of the Constitution of the US. Essentially, the court rules, or adjudicates, on the previous rulings challenged for their constitutionality. Hence, the Supreme Court is the final court of appeal in the US from inferior federal courts or from state courts in case the constitutional issue is involved. Procedure from Trial to Supreme Court It is critical to understand beforehand that not every case can be heard by the Supreme Court of the US. So as to be heard, a case must involve issues of federal law or rather fall within the jurisdiction of the federal courts. Any case that involves singly an issue of parties within a state, or just state law will likely stay within the state court system and in this case, that state's Supreme Court would be the last...

Popular Essays

logo

Emma Taylor

online

Hi there!
Would you like to get such a paper?
How about getting a customized one?