We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

The USA and USSR Essay Sample

essay
  • Pages: 5
  • Word count: 1,339
  • Rewriting Possibility: 99% (excellent)
  • Category: war

Get Full Essay

Get access to this section to get all help you need with your essay and educational issues.

Get Access

Introduction of TOPIC

I agree to some extent that the USA and USSR were already divided by irreconcilable differences by 1945 due to their ideological differences which contradicted the beliefs of the other nation. The USA believed in a democratic world which would benefit the economic interests of the USA with free open markets. However the USSR with its new position in the world aimed to improve its security by spreading its communist influence in neighbouring countries. Security was an important issue due to its past experiences of being attacked by the west through Eastern Europe such as the west’s intervention in the Russian civil war of 1917-18. This experience therefore led the Soviet Union to have a mutual suspicion of the motives of the USA and the west during the war. Therefore the USA and USSR were already divided by 1945. However they were not completely divided as they managed to become allies in their fight against Nazi Germany. The fact that they were able to unite to fight a common cause which was to defeat Nazi Germany illustrates that they were not divided by irreconcilable differences by 1945.

The two nations were already divided due to their ideological differences as highlighted in source 1 which is from the orthodox perspective. According to the USA, ‘The USSR was a revolutionary state’ inherently driven by Marxist-Leninist ideologies of world communist revolution. Therefore the USSR was already hostile to the west as its ideologies threatened the existence of democratic nations. The USSR was hoping to establish security along its borders by implementing soviet friendly governments which would be communist in nature. This was because the USSR perceived it to be in a ‘hostile and threatening world’ as outlined by source 1. Therefore, making it difficult for the USA to work with the USSR because it distrusted the west, so much so, that it needed to create a buffer state to protect itself from future invasions. However source one places greater importance to the USSR’s ideological differences that meant it ‘pursued political aims which went far beyond what was required for the sake of security’. This foreign policy would conflict with American ideology which was derived from Wilsonian liberalism and envisaged a world with free trade where tariffs would be abolished and there were open markets. Therefore due to their ideological differences the two superpowers became divided by the end of 1945.

However, the USA misinterpreted the actions and motives of the USSR which appeared to be expansionist and aggressive. But they were actually defensive measures carried out to protect the USSR from being attacked in the future. The USSR felt vulnerable because it had been invaded through Eastern Europe twice. Moreover it distrusted the west rightly so as the west had intervened in the Russian civil war of 1917 to prevent communism being established in the USSR. This led to a growing mutual suspicion of the motives of the west. Source 2 highlights this feeling of insecurity in the USSR which it suggests is the driving force for the creation of a buffer sta

te. ‘The wish to establish a security buffer’ (source 2) was reinforced further when the

Sorry, but full essay samples are available only for registered users

Choose a Membership Plan
western allies delayed the opening of the second front. This led Stalin to believe that the west wanted to see the USSR destroyed before they defeated Nazi Germany. Source 2 an author of the revisionist school of thought therefore implies that the USA and USSR were not completely divided by irreconcilable differences as the two sides could have potentially remained as allies had Truman tried to understand the actions of the USSR to be in the best interest of the security of the Soviet Union.

The power vacuum created in Eastern Europe exposed the differences between the two nations as both fought to compete in spreading their ideological influences that suited their interest as outlined in source 3 which is from the post-revisionist perspective. The USSR took Eastern Europe under its wing so that she could rebuild her economy using the resources of the eastern European states. SU was determined to improve its security by weakening countries around it especially Eastern Europe. However, Source 3 realises that this idea of Soviet ‘friendly governments in eastern Europe clashed with Americas long-term interests.’

The USA competed to spread its influence in Europe in order to keep an open market to sell American made goods. This implies that they were divided by their post war aims. Source 3 from the post revisionist perspective conveys that ‘Poland was at the centre of the origins of the cold war’. The fate of Poland was significant to Britain as that was the reason why they went to war. But Poland was also important to the USSR due to its geographical position as it was used as a route as an invasion of Russia three times ‘Stalin wished to make any repetition of this impossible'(source 2). For this reason the Soviet Union let the Polish Home army a non-communist resistance army be ‘crushed by the Nazi occupation forces’ before entering Warsaw. This ensured all possible resistance groups were eliminated, so that they were no longer a threat to Stalin. As a result this would make it easier to implement a communist friendly government in Poland. Therefore this signifies that the two superpowers were divided due to their differing post-war aims.

But the differences were not that great to the extent that it was irreconcilable because they managed to make agreements at Potsdam and Yalta conferences on the spheres of influence. At Yalta they agreed on the division of Germany, Berlin and Austria into temporary zones of influence. Stalin also agreed to join the United Nations organisation which would decide the fate of the post-war world. This was a sign of continued cooperation between the emerging superpowers, therefore implying that the USA and USSR were not divided by irreconcilable differences.

Further cooperation can be seen in the percentages deal over the spheres of influence agreed by Stalin and Churchill. Churchill formed the percentages agreement with Stalin where they would proportion power in Romania, Bulgaria, Greece, Yugoslavia and Hungary. However this plan could not be implemented as Roosevelt rejected it. This illustrates that they were not divided by irreconcilable differences as Britain a close democratic ally of the USA managed to make an agreement with Stalin on the spheres of influence. Therefore this supports the revisionist school of thought as this demonstrates Stalin’s ability to compromise over Eastern Europe. Moreover this suggests that the two countries were not completely divided due to their differences but it was rather down to the personalities of the leaders of both countries that led to a division.

Change in power in US government meant SU and USA could not resolve their differences. Roosevelt wanted to continue the policy of containment which had helped the two countries come to agreement on the spheres of influence in Europe. However when Truman came to power following the death of Roosevelt the division between the two states deepened with Truman keen not to be seen as being soft on communism. Therefore he adopted a tougher stance on the USSR as he did not want to appease the Stalin as he the west did with Hitler which eventually led to the SWW.

In conclusion the USA and USSR were not completely divided by irreconcilable differences because if they were they would have gone in conflict after the western allied intervention in the Russian civil war of 1917. However by 1945 due to their conflicting post war aims they began to show signs of hostility and division. But they could have remained as allies had the USA understood the USSR’s insecurities. Moreover the USSR may have continued to cooperate with the USA as they had done throughout the war had Truman not decided to be openly anti-communist and difficult to get along with.

We can write a custom essay on

The USA and USSR Essay Sample ...
According to Your Specific Requirements.

Order an essay

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

The Civil Rights Act and Reconstruction Act

The American Civil War and Reconstruction Era have caused a general and social change, most particularly for the African Americans in the South. The passing of the Civil Rights Act, Reconstruction Act, and the unwritten Compromise of 1877 to end Reconstruction was all a fight for the African Americans to gain their equality and freedom. The Civil War had entirely changed how Americans viewed their morals. During the American Civil War and Reconstruction period, continuity and change were constantly occurring through the legislations that the President and government were passing, along with the impact it had on the African Americans, and the southerners reaction to these new measures. One of the legislations that were passed by Congress that had impacted the African Americans and white southerners were the Civil Rights Act of 1866. The Civil Rights Act of 1866 purpose was to protect the Freedmen from the Black Codes and...

The Handmaid’s Tale by Margaret Atwood overview

The Handmaid’s Tale by Margaret Atwood is based on the anxieties of the 1980’s impending nuclear war and the issues of gender and reproduction. Atwood portrays a dystopian society based in a republic called Gilead, which is run by a theocratic and misogynist dictatorship. The society distorts the hierarchy of its citizens from the modern world, to one that characterizes males as the ruling class, who oversee women in servant roles. Most of the women population of Gilead is infertile, while the women that still have the ability of child- bearing, live under sexual degradation as handmaids in the households of the Commanders that act as the ruling class. By using a feminist and Marxist viewpoint to analyze the novel, it magnifies the power that women have over themselves and others regardless of their suppression and to further the agenda of men. Due to economic factors, the Gileadean society is...

The hybrid threat of the Second Indochina...

The hybrid threat of the Second Indochina War significantly contributed to the unification of Vietnam and the only known loss to the United States of America. The combination of assistance from Communist allies to the North Vietnamese and Viet Cong, along with the tactics utilized, played a monumental role in defeating the Republic of South Vietnam and the U. S. These regular and irregular forces’ working together in conjunction of the aid rendered by China and the Soviet Union is an excellent example of a hybrid threat. The North Vietnamese Army (NVA) and the Viet Cong (VC) both shared mutual desires to Re-Unify Vietnam into one country and remove the western influence within their region. The NVA utilized conventional or regular military tactics when fighting a campaign. The VC were opposite of their counterparts in their approach to fighting. The VC utilized “guerilla warfare” or irregular tactics to fight. The...

Popular Essays

logo

Emma Taylor

online

Hi there!
Would you like to get such a paper?
How about getting a customized one?