We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

Was the United States Justified in Going to War With Mexico? Essay Sample

essay
  • Pages: 3
  • Word count: 671
  • Rewriting Possibility: 99% (excellent)
  • Category: war

Get Full Essay

Get access to this section to get all help you need with your essay and educational issues.

Get Access

Introduction of TOPIC

Mexico and the United States were two nations who had different opinions. Mexico was catholic which were people who were anti -slavery; this is to keep Texans under their control. Protestants was the opposite, they were for slavery. It wasn’t long before the problems became something serious. Texans won their independence in 1836. Texas applied for annexation twice over the course of nine years they received a no both times. Mexico declared its independence in 1821 from Spain. In 1844 Polk became president. He believed strongly in Manifest Destiny. He believed it was God Plan that American become larger. Polk sent soldiers to the southern Texas. May 9 1846, Mexican soldiers open fired on American soldiers’ .Each side blames the other, Americans blames the Mexican saying they were attacked on American soil and the Mexican says the Americans invaded their land.

The confusion seems to be over what Mexico thought was the proper border between Texas and Mexico which is the Nueces River. However, the American was unjustified in going to war with Mexico. The United States was not justified in going to war with Mexico because Polk provoked it, Robbery of Land, and Expansion of Slavery. One reason the Mexican was not justified was because Polk provoked it. Polk wrote a message to the senate informing them on his order for the military to attack the on the Rio Grande on Mexican troops. Most of Congress said yes to the war message. American Troops came to the border

looking for trouble. Was the United States Justified in Going to

Sorry, but full essay samples are available only for registered users

Choose a Membership Plan
War With Mexico ? were fired. Sixty three American troops attacked the Mexican troops. They surrender to the Mexican. The American felt as Mexico had invaded the territory and American shed blood on their soil. This evidence shows United States was not justified in going to war because Polk was being greedy. The second reason the Mexican war was not justified in going to war because the robbery of land. The Mexican government felt that the annexation of Texas by the US was unacceptable nor did they recognize it. They was just protecting there territory. To the Mexican knowledge the Nueces River is their territory .Mexico thought they were being invaded which cause them to attack the American troop’s.

This evidence shows the United States was not justified in going to war with Mexico because Mexican troops was protecting themselves . A third reason the Mexican War was not justified was because expansion of slavery. There were 103,000 whites and 38,000 slaves .In 8121 along with Mexico receiving its independence they made slavery illegal. Sumner was the senator for 24 years and then became the president. Sumner didn’t like slavery just as much as the people didn’t. At this time people were beginning to move into Texas. This evidence shows the United States was not justified in going to war with Mexico because Texas was already a free state and I should stay that way. In brief, the Mexican-American war was unjustifiable because of robbery of land, expansion of slavery, and also because Polk provoked it. Americans came to the border looking for trouble causing the Mexican to retaliate with gun fire.

Mexican War became a major accomplishment in the expansion of the country. It is important today because you can’t picture the United States without California, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah, most ofArizona and parts of Wyoming and Colorado. If Mexico had won the war, I strongly believe that the United States would have been less powerful than it is as of today. Mexico, on the other hand, would have become a more affluent country. I believe that the United States winning the Mexican war was crucial for the country’s expansion and progress. The Mexican-American War is a piece of history whose significance should not be rewarded with insignificance or confusion, but rather understanding of the event itself and its lasting effects.

We can write a custom essay on

Was the United States Justified in Going to War Wi ...
According to Your Specific Requirements.

Order an essay

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

The Civil Rights Act and Reconstruction Act

The American Civil War and Reconstruction Era have caused a general and social change, most particularly for the African Americans in the South. The passing of the Civil Rights Act, Reconstruction Act, and the unwritten Compromise of 1877 to end Reconstruction was all a fight for the African Americans to gain their equality and freedom. The Civil War had entirely changed how Americans viewed their morals. During the American Civil War and Reconstruction period, continuity and change were constantly occurring through the legislations that the President and government were passing, along with the impact it had on the African Americans, and the southerners reaction to these new measures. One of the legislations that were passed by Congress that had impacted the African Americans and white southerners were the Civil Rights Act of 1866. The Civil Rights Act of 1866 purpose was to protect the Freedmen from the Black Codes and...

The Handmaid’s Tale by Margaret Atwood overview

The Handmaid’s Tale by Margaret Atwood is based on the anxieties of the 1980’s impending nuclear war and the issues of gender and reproduction. Atwood portrays a dystopian society based in a republic called Gilead, which is run by a theocratic and misogynist dictatorship. The society distorts the hierarchy of its citizens from the modern world, to one that characterizes males as the ruling class, who oversee women in servant roles. Most of the women population of Gilead is infertile, while the women that still have the ability of child- bearing, live under sexual degradation as handmaids in the households of the Commanders that act as the ruling class. By using a feminist and Marxist viewpoint to analyze the novel, it magnifies the power that women have over themselves and others regardless of their suppression and to further the agenda of men. Due to economic factors, the Gileadean society is...

The hybrid threat of the Second Indochina...

The hybrid threat of the Second Indochina War significantly contributed to the unification of Vietnam and the only known loss to the United States of America. The combination of assistance from Communist allies to the North Vietnamese and Viet Cong, along with the tactics utilized, played a monumental role in defeating the Republic of South Vietnam and the U. S. These regular and irregular forces’ working together in conjunction of the aid rendered by China and the Soviet Union is an excellent example of a hybrid threat. The North Vietnamese Army (NVA) and the Viet Cong (VC) both shared mutual desires to Re-Unify Vietnam into one country and remove the western influence within their region. The NVA utilized conventional or regular military tactics when fighting a campaign. The VC were opposite of their counterparts in their approach to fighting. The VC utilized “guerilla warfare” or irregular tactics to fight. The...

Popular Essays

logo

Emma Taylor

online

Hi there!
Would you like to get such a paper?
How about getting a customized one?