We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

Bias, Rhetorical Devices, and Augmentation Essay Sample


Get Full Essay

Get access to this section to get all help you need with your essay and educational issues.

Get Access

Introduction of TOPIC

Axia College of University of Phoenix

Week 1 Assignment: Bias, Rhetorical Devices, and Argumentation Here are some of the examples that I found in the speech: The Campaigner states, “There is only one man who can rid the politics of this State of the evil domination of Boss Jim Gettys” (Axia College, 2009). This is an example of gender bias because it says only one “man” can do it. I believe this is also an example of hyperbole because it is exaggerating saying only that one person can do something. “Evil domination” is an example of a personal attack ad hominem, because it is insinuating that Gettys is an evil dominator. By saying “Boss” the speaker is trying to make people think negatively of him, so this is an example of innuendo and he uses this device throughout his speech. Then there is “the fighting liberal,” which is a paradox, “friend of the working man” is a euphemism and gender bias, and “next Governor of this State” (Axia College, 2009) is wishful thinking. Kane then states, “dishonesty, the downright villainy,” which is a dysphemism, “political machine—now in complete control of the government of this State” (Axia College, 2009) is an example of scare tactics.

“I made no campaign promises, because until a few weeks ago I had no hope of being elected,” (Axia College, 2009) this is a few different things like slippery slope, argument from pity, and scapegoating. ‘Now, however, I have something more than a hope,” (Axia College, 2009) is

wishful thinking. “And Jim Gettys—Jim Gettys” is an example of alliteration, “has something

Sorry, but full essay samples are available only for registered users

Choose a Membership Plan
less than a chance” (Axia College, 2009) is wishful thinking. “Every straw vote, every independent poll shows that I’ll be elected” (Axia College, 2009) is rationalization. “Now I can afford to make some promises” (Axia College, 2009) is wishful thinking.

Kane also states, “The working man—The working man” is alliteration and gender bias, “slum child” (Axia College, 2009) is a dysphemism. “The working man and the slum child know” and “The decent, ordinary citizens know” (Axia College, 2009) are both arguments from popularity. The use of “slum child” and “decent, ordinary citizens” could be an example of stereotypical bias. “I’ll do everything in my power to protect” is a hyperbole; “the underprivileged, the underpaid, and the underfed” (Axia College, 2009) is alliteration. The statement “Well, I’d make my promises now if I weren’t too busy arranging to keep them” (Axia College, 2009) is a weaseler. The last thing that Kane states, “Here’s one promise I’ll make, and boss Jim Gettys knows I’ll keep it: My first official act as Governor of this State will be to appoint a Special District Attorney to arrange for the indictment, prosecution, and conviction of Boss Jim W. Gettys” (Axia College, 2009) is an example of proof surrogate. The speaker’s main argument or case he is trying to make throughout the entire speech is that he will make a better Governor then Jim Gettys and he is going to win the election. I believe he uses inductive reasoning to address these arguments. He tries to support his claim by tearing down his opponent, but his evidence just is not substantive.

He doesn’t really provide enough proof; he mainly uses circular reasoning and beats around the bush, so to speak. In my opinion, he is a true politician, because he makes it sound like he is making a lot of promises without actually making a single one. Were the speaker’s arguments effective? That is a hard choice. I think the audience would fall for it “hook, line, and sinker;” however, he actually did not use credible evidence to back his statements. He never actually made any political claims, except that he wanted to punish Jim Gettys when he became Governor. Therefore, I think his speech was effective to his target audience, but not to me.

Axia College. (2009). Week one materials. Retrieved April 22, 2009, from Axia College, Week One, rEsource. COM220—Research Writing Course Website.

We can write a custom essay on

Bias, Rhetorical Devices, and Augmentation Essay S ...
According to Your Specific Requirements.

Order an essay

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

The Ontological Argument

The question of God ‚™s existence has been debated through the history of man, with every philosopher from Socrates to Immanuel Kant weighing in on the debate. So great has this topic become that numerous proofs have been invented and utilized to prove or disprove God ‚™s existence. The ontological proof, the cosmological proof, and the teleological proof are the three main divisions. No true answer has been found, but in the Western world people tend to agree with one of these three ‚Nsproofs ‚N of God. The Ontological Argument, which argues from a definition of God‚™s being to his existence, is the first type of argument explored. Since Saint Anslem founded this argument, his writings are the most examined. Saint Anslem starts by defining God as an all-perfect being, or rather as a being containing all conceivable perfections. Now if in addition of possessing all conceivable perfections this being...

The Thirteen American Arguments: An Evaluation

Introduction Arguments are what makes and keeps America.  Howard Fineman offers and introduces the fundamental issues that perennially and perpetually beset the nation which is essential to its becoming.  The book did not particularly provided an absolute and final answer to these questions but indefinitely maintains and argues for their open ended nature as inherent and necessary.  And the American nation has since its inception, have continually struggled to sip through these arguments to find and create a better future for the people. The author.  Howard Fineman is a journalist and a columnist.  He is currently a political correspondent in Newsweek and news analyst at NBC. Following his professional background, he had always been engaged in the unending issues and debates in the political and economic realities and occurrences that afflict people on a daily basis.  Through this book, he tried to summarize the underlying primary themes that comprehensively encompass...

Assessing Sweatshop Essay

BA 3300 – BUSINESS CORNERSTONE Assessing Sweatshop Essay You will use the critical thinking skills you have been developing to identify violations of the Universal Intellectual Standards and Logical Fallacies in the essay, “Sweatshirts from Sweatshops” on pages 406-408 of your textbook. On pages 387-405 of your textbook, you will meet Tanya, Kevin, Elise, Dalton, and Hope. Tanya encounters a series of discussions—the first with Kevin, the second with Elise, and the third with Hope. The textbook describes how to critically assess the arguments in the first two discussions (Kevin and Elise and Dalton). Use these ONLY as examples for how to use critical thinking skills. In addition, you will want to review the Universal Intellectual Standards on pages 335-347 and the Logical Fallacies on pages 396-399 in the textbook. Individual Exercise 1: You are to assess the arguments made in the essay, “Sweatshirts from Sweatshops,” found on pages 406-408....

Popular Essays


Emma Taylor


Hi there!
Would you like to get such a paper?
How about getting a customized one?