We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

Gerald K. Adams v Uno Restaurants, Inc Essay Sample

essay
  • Pages: 3
  • Word count: 748
  • Rewriting Possibility: 99% (excellent)
  • Category: jury

Get Full Essay

Get access to this section to get all help you need with your essay and educational issues.

Get Access

Introduction of TOPIC

Facts: On May 20, 1996, the plaintiff, who had been employed by the defendant for several years, arrived for his nighttime line cooking shift at the defendant’s Warwick restaurant. Shortly, after his shift began, the plaintiff noticed that the kitchen floor was saturated with a foul-smelling liquid coming from drains and backing up water onto the floor. He complained of illness and went home, at which time he contacted the Department of Health about the drainage problem in the restaurant’s kitchen. A Department of Health representative visited the restaurant that evening and noticed that the floor drains were backed up and that the floor was wet and slippery. She ordered the kitchen staff to dispose of all the food they had touched with their bare hands and closed the restaurant for the night, leaving instructions to sanitize the kitchen area and clear all the drains. She also inquired about which employee went home sick. The restaurant reopened the next day after sanitizing the kitchen. On May 22, 1996, two days after the incident, the plaintiff, who was not scheduled to work that day, returned to the restaurant curious to determine whether there was any hostility toward him resulting from his having called the Department of Health. The plaintiff testified that he was summarily ordered by David Badot, the restaurant’s manager, to come into his office and that Badot proceeded to shout at him while inquiring whether he had contacted the Department of Health. The plaintiff testified that he shouted back at Badot and acknowledged that he had indeed called Department of Health.

Badot then accused the plaintiff of s

tealing one of the defendant’s softball team shirts and of taking a work schedule home. Badot then

Sorry, but full essay samples are available only for registered users

Choose a Membership Plan
left his office, and the plaintiff followed him out into the general cooking area, where other employees were present. The shouting match between Badot and the plaintiff continued and in the course thereof, the plaintiff told Badot that he “was going to follow him back to Massachusetts on this, and (he) was going to blow the intelligence out of his head.” The plaintiff then left the restaurant. Badot claimed to have perceived the plaintiff’s words as threatening and instructed an employee to call the police. When the plaintiff later heard that the police were looking for him, he voluntary went to the Warwick police station, whereupon he was then charged with disorderly conduct, arraigned, and pled not guilty. No trail on the charge ensued. Shortly thereafter, the plaintiff commenced this civil action against the defendant alleging therein that he had been unlawfully terminated only because he had notified the Department of Health regarding the unsanitary kitchen conditions existing at the defendant’s Warwick Pizzeria Uno Restaurant & Bar. The jury’s verdict was in favor of Adams for $7500. Uno Restaurants Inc. then filed a motion for judgment N.O.V. as matter of law, arguing that Adams had been fired for threatening Badot.

Issue: Should the court grant the motion in this case? The point of law is Motion for Judgment N.O.V.

Decision: No. The state supreme court explained, “When considering such a motion, the trail justice examines the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving, without weighing the evidence or evaluating the credibility of witnesses, and draws from the records all reasonable inferences that support the position of the nonmoving party. If, after such a review, there remain factual issues upon which reasonable persons might draw different conclusions, the motion for judgment as a matter of law must be denied.” In this case, “after examining the evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, the trail justice decided that a reasonable jury could have found that Badot’s actions in badgering the plaintiff and then having him arrested were a pretext for retaliating against the plaintiff for having called in the Department of Health.

Reason: The jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, Gerald K. Adams, finding that the defendant, Uno Restaurant, Inc. had wrongfully terminated the plaintiff’s employment in violation of the Whistleblowers’ Protection Act Chapter 50 motion for judgment as a matter of law, upon which decision had been reserved, denied the defendant’s motion, upheld the jury’s finding on the defendant’s liability, but set aside the jury’s award of damages to the plaintiff.

We can write a custom essay on

Gerald K. Adams v Uno Restaurants, Inc Essay Sampl ...
According to Your Specific Requirements.

Order an essay

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

The Grand Jury System

What is a Grand Jury and what is it's purpose According to the Federal Grand Jury website, [1] a grand jury is a group of people that are selected and sworn in by a court, just like jurors that are chosen to serve on a trial jury (such as the jury in the O.J. Simpson criminal case or in the Louise Woodward ("au pair") murder case).   In fact, the grand jurors are usually chosen from the same pool of people that provide trial jurors:  A judge selects and swears in a grand jury, just like judges select and swear in trial juries.  But grand juries differ from trial juries in several ways.         For one thing, grand juries may sit for longer.  In the federal system, a grand jury can sit for up to 36 months, although it doesn't have to sit that long.  The court that swears in a...

Long-delayed Murder Case Goes To Trial

            Watching a jury trial was a novel experience for me because I came from a country where jury trial is not practiced. On trial for homicide was Norgin Baez, a 25-year-old immigrant from the Dominican Republic. He was charged with the alleged motiveless killing on December 22, 2002 of one Mabel Melo, 20 years of age, a fellow immigrant from the Dominican Republic and the fiancée and mother of a one-year-old son of Francisco Pequero, a cousin of the accused. The records of the case showed that the accused Baez, in the company of at least another unidentified person, entered the apartment of the victim and stabbed her 59 times in different parts of her body as they dragged her across the apartment. They finally left her body in the kitchen but not before pulling her panties down to her hips. Her dead body was discovered the following morning...

The Seventh Amendment

The Seventh Amendment lays the foundation for jury trials for civil litigants in the way criminal defendants are protected from the self-will of courts through the Sixth Amendment. The adoption of the amendment was a breakthrough in the development of the legal system in the new state. Although its application was subject to interpretation, the basic understanding of civil juries remains intact to this day. The Amendment reads as follows: "In suits at common law where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States than according to the rules of common law." It was ratified on December 15, 1791. The history of the amendment is relatively simple, although like many provisions of the US Constitution it evoked some controversy. The Amendment was discussed...

Popular Essays

logo

Emma Taylor

online

Hi there!
Would you like to get such a paper?
How about getting a customized one?